STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

SEALTEST FOODS )

A DIVISION OF KRAFTCO CORPORATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 76-195

)

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ) AGRICULTURE & CONSUMER SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held before Charles C. Adams, Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings at the State Office Building, corner of West Morse Boulevard, Winter Park, Florida at 10:00 A.M., April 28, 1976.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner: R. D. Saunders, Zone Manager

Sealtest Foods

109 Governors Street Tampa, Florida 33602

For Respondent: Jack Shoemaker, Esquire

Resident Counsel

515 Mayo Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

ISSUE

Whether or not the Petitioner should be entitled to an extension of the shelf life on its milk and milk products from a ten day period to a twelve day period.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Testimony offered by Jay Boosinger, Director of Dairy Industry, for the Department of Agriculture and Gene Smith, Supervisor of Dairy Products Inspection Enforcement, indicated that the Respondent had investigated the request for extension of shelf life from ten days to twelve days on the milk and milk products of the Petitioner and based on the laboratory analysis of the test samples, they felt that the request should be accepted. Jay Boosinger has as his duty the direction of the program which is designed to regulate the quality of dairy products within the State of Florida. Gene Smith is, as his title indicates, charged with the function of inspection and enforcement of the laws and regulations associated with the dairy industry in the State of Florida.

2. Testimony was offered in this hearing which indicated that certain samples of the Petitioner's milk and milk products had been collected at the Petitioner's Tampa, Florida plant and the Petitioner's trucks. These samples were collected by a dairy plant specialist of the Respondent, and then in turn were taken to a laboratory of the Respondent for analysis. The laboratory analysis was designed to ultimately determine the number of days that the samples would be acceptable beyond the code expiration date found on the container, which expiration date would have been at the ten day point. There is an exhibit, which is Respondent's Exhibit #1 that identifies the product, collection point, the established expiration date, the laboratory evaluation date and the days that the product was found to be acceptable beyond the ten day established expiration date. In addition this exhibit contains the laboratory analysis of the products together with attendant correspondence on the issue of the extension of the shelf life. The test samples in Respondent's Exhibit #1 show in the date acceptable pass column, how many days past the ten days the product would have held up without losing flavor and becoming unacceptable in terms of shelf life.

   
   

3. The laboratory analyses and summary of those analyses showed available shelf life above the ten day life expressed in the regulation found in Chapter 5D-104 (7)(d), Florida Administrative Code.

   
   

   CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

   
   

4. It is concluded as a matter of law that the testimony produced in the hearing has sufficiently established the necessary supporting justification to cause the Respondent to grant specific authority for allowing a shelf life for the milk and milk products of the Petitioner to be extended to twelve days.

Such extension would be in keeping with Section 502.042(2), Florida Statutes and Chapter 5D-104(7)(d), Florida Administrative Code.

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that the Respondent grant a shelf life of twelve days on the milk and milk products identified in the course of the hearing held on the question of the petition.

DONE and ENTERED this 25th day of May, 1976, in Tallahassee, Florida.

CHARLES C. ADAMS, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:

R. D. Saunders, Zone Manager Sealtest Foods

109 Governors Street Tampa, Florida 33602

Jack Shoemaker, Esquire Resident Counsel

515 Mayo Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

Docket for Case No: 76-000195

Orders for Case No: 76-000195