STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ) PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD ) OF NURSING, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 79-1243

) JIMMY FRANKLIN PINION, L.P.N., )

)

Respondent. )

)

RECOMMENDED ORDER

Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, James E. Bradwell, held a public hearing in this case on August 8, 1979, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The transcript of the final hearing was received on August 30, 1979.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioner: Julius Finegold, Esquire

1107 Blackstone Building

233 East Bay Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202

For Respondent: Roger D. Haagenson, Esquire

Suite 601, Cumberland Building 800 East Broward Boulevard

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 ISSUE

At issue herein is whether or not the Respondent's rights to practice nursing in this state should be suspended, revoked or placed on probation based on conduct set forth hereinafter in detail as set forth in the Petitioner's Administrative Complaint filed herein on or about January 9, 1979.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, the following relevant facts are found.

1. Jimmy Franklin Pinion, L.P.N., holds License No. 42845-1, as a Licensed Practical Nurse. Respondent was employed as a private duty nurse caring for Elsie B. Allen, a ninety-three-year-old woman, during the period April, 1978, through September 11, 1978, when he was dismissed for alleged physical abuse of Mrs. Allen and for alleged possession of controlled substances, to-wit: Valium and marijuana, on or about August 15, 1978.

2. The Complaint alleges that on or about September 9, 1978, Respondent slapped Mrs. Allen twice on her forehead, resulting in bruises to the forehead. Concluding the Complaint alleges that the Respondent is guilty of unprofessional conduct in violation of Florida Statutes Subsections 464.21(1)(b) and (d).

   
   

3. Anna Marie Snyder, an L.P.N. in Florida since approximately 1971, testified and expressed her familiarity with the Respondent since his employment with Mrs. Allen. Snyder testified that Mrs. Allen employed three round the clock nurses, one of whom was the Respondent, Jimmy Franklin Pinion. Ms. Snyder testified that she occasionally stayed at Mrs. Allen's home and that while so doing, she used a back bedroom which the Respondent also used occasionally. She testified that a problem arose with respect to a suspicion that some brownies had been placed in the refrigerator which were laced with marijuana. According to Ms. Snyder, the Respondent made the brownies and brought them to Mrs. Allen's home. Ms. Snyder also testified that she discovered marijuana in the back bedroom and that she brought the matter of the marijuana-laced brownies to the attention of Mrs. Allen's two nephews. According to Ms. Snyder, Respondent stressed the fact that Mrs. Allen had to be taken care of "firmly." On cross- examination, Ms. Snyder testified that the Respondent admitted that the brownies which were in a bag in the back bedroom belonged to him and that Respondent admitted that he had struck Mrs. Allen with a cane. Ms. Snyder's testimony is that bags of marijuana were found in a closed used by the Respondent, wherein crocheting and other personal items belonging to Respondent were located. She testified that vials of other drugs were confiscated by Mrs. Allen's attorney on or about September 11, 1978.

   
   

4. Lorraine Clark Ruskin, an L.P.N. licensed for more than twenty-eight years, was also employed by Mrs. Allen as a private duty nurse. Ms. Ruskin testified that on August 15, 1978, she, along with Ms. Snyder, visited Respondent's rear bedroom where Respondent showed her marijuana in the rear bedroom. Approximately April 28, 1978, Ms. Ruskin had some photos taken which were introduced into evidence over the objections of Respondent's counsel. (Petitioner's Exhibits 1 through 5.) According to Ms. Ruskin, Respondent and a friend of his allegedly hit Mrs. Allen on her forehead, causing bruises, on or about September 9, 1978. Attorneys Carl Hiassen and G. Ware Cornell, Jr., visited the Allen's home on the morning of September 11, 1978, and dismissed the Respondent from Mrs. Allen's employ for alleged patient abuse and possession of drugs. Ms. Ruskin testified that she took Mrs. Allen to a psychiatrist who diagnosed Mrs. Allen as being incompetent to handle her own affairs due to an organic brain syndrome caused by generalized arterioscleriotic cardiovascular disease. (Respondent's Exhibit 2.) She testified that Mrs. Allen had a history of falling and that the subject incident, which gave rise to the bruises, occurred approximately September 10, 1978. She testified that the Respondent was terminated on September 11, 1978, when bruises were found on Mrs. Allen's forehead.

   
   

5. G. Ware Cornell, Jr., an associate of Attorney Carl Hiassen, visited Mrs. Allen's home on September 11, 1978, for the purpose of terminating the Respondent. The reasons given for the termination were "unsatisfactory performance and suggestion of drug possession." Attorney Cornell testified that he visited the back bedroom where the Respondent stayed while at Mrs. Allen's home and discovered what appeared to be Valium, marijuana and other drugs. Attorney Cornell testified that when the Respondent was terminated, he was told to return all keys to the Allen's home that were in his possession.

   
   

6. Carl A. Hiassen, Esquire, has been representing Mrs. Allen since World War II and visited the Allen's residence on September 11, 1978, for the express

   purpose of preparing a termination notice for the Respondent. He testified that he discovered drugs in a bedroom which he was told was being occupied by the Respondent. He testified that he made a list of the substances which he considered to be drugs and gave it to Mrs. Markowitz, Petitioner's representative in the Fort Lauderdale area. Attorney Hiassen testified that he retained custody of the drugs until approximately January of 1979, at which time there were given to Mrs. Markowitz. Mrs. Markowitz later turned the substances over to the Broward County Sheriff's office for chemical analysis. According to Mrs. Markowitz, the substances were analyzed by John T. Pennie, a forensic chemist for the Broward County Sheriff's office Crime Laboratory. Neither the substances nor the person performing the analysis appeared at the hearing to testify with respect to the identify of the substances. Respondent appeared at the hearing and testified that he had a prescription for Valium and, to the best of his recollection, he only had one or two tablets remaining from a prescription which he had filled sometime ago. Respondent denied having in his possession marijuana or any other controlled substance prescribed by Chapter 893, Florida Statutes. Respondent testified that Mrs. Allen had a problem signing blank checks for a Mrs. Carr who had taken approximately $40,000 from Mrs. Allen. Additionally, Respondent testified that Mrs. Allen never called him by his name. He testified that he contacted Mr. Hiassen's office to report the fact that Mrs. Allen was signing blank checks and the funds were diverted for the purposes for which they were intended by Mrs. Allen.

   
   

7. Mrs. Allen did not testify at the hearing allegedly due to her physical condition.

   
   

   CONCLUSIONS

   
   

8. Due to the hearsay nature of the identity of the substances analyzed by the Crime Laboratory, the undersigned is unable to conclude that the Respondent had possession of drugs or other prescribed substances in violation of Chapter 893, Florida Statutes, as alleged. Among other things, there were problems with the chain of custody from the Allen's residence to the Crime Laboratory and the fact that at least one other nurse shared the same room in which it is alleged that the Respondent allegedly stored Valium and marijuana.

   
   

9. Finally, the Respondent emphatically denied that he struck Mrs. Allen and the only testimony to refute this denial was heresay and thus falls within the proscriptions of Section 120.58, Florida Statutes. In view thereof, I shall recommend that the Administrative Complaint filed herein be dismissed in its entirety.

   
   

   CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

   
   

10. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. Subsection 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

    
    

11. The parties were duly noticed pursuant to the notice provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.

    
    

12. The authority of the Petitioner, Board of Nursing, is derived from Chapter 464, Florida Statutes.

    
    

13. Insufficient evidence was offered to establish the Administrative Complaint allegations filed herein.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby,

RECOMMENDED:

That the Administrative Complaint filed herein be DISMISSED. RECOMMENDED this 9th day of October, 1979, in Tallahassee, Florida.

JAMES E. BRADWELL, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 101, Collins Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:

Geraldine B. Johnson, R.N.

Department of Professional Regulation Board of Nursing

Suite 504, Richard P. Daniel State Office Building

111 East Coast Line Drive Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Julius Finegold, Esq. 1107 Blackstone Building

233 East Bay Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Roger D. Haagenson, Esq.

Suite 601, Cumberland Building 800 East Broward Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Docket for Case No: 79-001243

Orders for Case No: 79-001243