Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs. EDWARD G. BATTER, D/B/A TROPICANA POOLS, INC., 79-001938 (1979)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 79-001938 Visitors: 16
Judges: JAMES E. BRADWELL
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 1980
Summary: The issues posed for decision herein are whether or not the certified pool contractor's license issued to Respondents Licensee, Edward G. Batter, should be revoked or suspended or the Licensee's right to practice thereunder should be withdrawn based on conduct which will be set forth hereinafter in detail as set out in the Administrative Complaint filed herein on August 23, 1979.Revoke contractor's license for abandonment and diversion.
79-1938.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT ) OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ) LICENSING BOARD, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 79-1938

)

EDWARD G. BATTER d/b/a )

TROPICANA POOLS, INC., )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, James E. Bradwell, held a public hearing in this case on January 31, 1980, in Apopka, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Michael Egan, Esquire

ROBERTS & EGAN, P.A.

Post Office Box 1386 Tallahassee, Florida 32302


For Respondent: /1 David Kerben, Esquire

118 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801


ISSUES


The issues posed for decision herein are whether or not the certified pool contractor's license issued to Respondents Licensee, Edward G. Batter, should be revoked or suspended or the Licensee's right to practice thereunder should be withdrawn based on conduct which will be set forth hereinafter in detail as set out in the Administrative Complaint filed herein on August 23, 1979.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Based upon my observation of the witnesses and their demeanor while testifying, the arguments of counsel and the entire record compiled herein, the following relevant facts are found.


  2. Edward G. Batter, d/b/a Tropicana Pools, Inc., (Respondent or Licensee) is a certified pool contractor who holds license No. CPC 012906. Respondent was first licensed on July 28, 1978, as qualifier of Tropicana Pools, Inc., which license was temporarily suspended in June, 1979, and remains in an invalid status to this date.

  3. By its Administrative Complaint, Petitioner's Executive Director took action to revoke or otherwise suspend the Respondent's rights to practice pursuant to his referenced license. As a licensed pool contractor, Respondent is subject to the Board's rules and regulations. (See Petitioner's Composite Exhibit 1.)


  4. A special meeting of the Board of Adjustment, Appeals and Examiners for general building contractors for Hillsborough County was held on Thursday, July 19, 1979, for the purpose of hearing certain allegations concerning the demise of Tropicana pools, Inc. Jerry Taylor, Petitioner's field investigator, presented the Hillsborough County Board with the results of an investigation of Respondent and presented several cases wherein funds were diverted after being collected for a specific contract to other projects or for other purposes and that projects for which funds had been collected had either been left unstarted or abandoned at the time Tropicana Pools, Inc., ceased doing business. At that meeting, the Respondent's construction activities were suspended by the Board until restitution or settlement was made and verified by affected parties. The temporary suspension by Hillsborough County became final during August of 1979. (Petitioner's Exhibits 2 and 3.)


  5. Howard Shaw, Director of Building and Zoning for the City of Tampa, appeared and testified to substantiate the disciplinary action taken against the Respondent by Hillsborough County during the summer of 1979.


  6. On June 7, 1979, Mr. and Mrs. James R. Stanton entered into a contract with Respondent to have a pool constructed for a price of $8,182.00. Respondent was paid a 10 percent deposit to commence construction of the Stantons' pool. Respondent absconded with the deposit and never notified the Stantons that their pool would not be built nor did Respondent return their deposit. (See Petitioner's Exhibits 4 and 5.)


  7. On April 19, 1979, Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Hillary entered into a contract for the construction of a swimming pool for a contract price of

    $8,130.00. Approximately $5,690.00 or approximately 70 percent of the contract sum was paid on June 18, 1979, and the work ceased on the Hillary project at a completion stage of approximately 40 percent. Respondent abandoned the Hillary project on approximately June 5, 1979. The Hillarys completed their pool at a price of approximately $5,000.00 over and above the contracted price. (Petitioner's Composite Exhibit 6.)


  8. On April 30, 1979, Mr. and Mrs. Leon Tope entered into a contract for the construction of a swimming pool at their residence for the contract price of

    $8,050.00. On June 18, 1979, the Topes had tendered to Respondent approximately

    70 percent of the contract cost while the Respondent abandoned the construction of the Topes' pool after approximately 40 percent of the work was complete. Respondent abandoned the project on June 18, 1979, and the Topes completed the construction of their pool at a price of approximately $2,000.00 by engaging the services of other contractors in the area. (See Petitioner's Exhibits 7, 8, 9, 10, and the testimony of Jim Moran.)


  9. Jerry Taylor, Petitioner's field investigator, attended the probable cause hearing during August of 1979 in which the Hillsborough County Board of Examiners suspended the pool license of Respondent. Investigator Taylor briefed the Hillsborough County Board respecting the results of the investigation conducted by Petitioner.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  10. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.


  11. The parties were duly noticed pursuant to the notice provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.


  12. The authority of the Board is derived from Chapter 468, Florida Statutes.


  13. Based on the Respondent's acts and conduct as set forth above, competent and substantial evidence was offered to establish that the Respondent diverted funds' and property received for completion of a specified construction project or operation and thereby violated Section 468.112(2)(e) and that the Respondent abandoned construction projects in which he was engaged as a contractor within the meaning of Section 468.112(2)(h), Florida Statutes.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that the Respondent's pool contractor's license No. CPC 012906 be REVOKED.


ENTERED this 10th day of March, 1980, in Tallahassee, Florida.


JAMES E. BRADWELL, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings

101 Collins Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675


ENDNOTE


1/ Although noticed, Respondent or its counsel did not appear at the administrative hearing herein.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Michael Egan, Esquire ROBERTS & EGAN, P.A.

Post Office Box 1386 Tallahassee, Florida 32302


David Kerben, Esquire

118 East Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801


Docket for Case No: 79-001938
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 30, 1980 Final Order filed.
Mar. 10, 1980 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 79-001938
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 23, 1980 Agency Final Order
Mar. 10, 1980 Recommended Order Revoke contractor's license for abandonment and diversion.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer