Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. MARY E. HORDGE, T/A MARY`S RESTAURANT, 83-003033 (1983)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 83-003033 Visitors: 12
Judges: CHARLES C. ADAMS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 1984
Summary: The issues in this instance are presented through a Notice to Show Cause/Administrative Complaint, in which the Petitioner accuses Respondent, Mary Hordge, through actions of her agent, servant or employee, Mary Donnovan, of unlawfully selling alcoholic beverages in a manner not permitted by the license, namely the sale for consumption on-premises under the package sales license, contrary to Section 562.12, Florida Statutes.Dismiss. There was no proof employee was in fact an employee and open b
More
83-3033.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


STATE OF FLORIDA, DIVISION )

OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND )

TOBACCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 83-3033

)

MARY E. HORDGE, t/a )

MARY'S RESTAURANT )

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held before Charles C. Adams, a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings. This hearing was conducted on December 22, 1983, in Jacksonville, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: James N. Watson, Jr., Esquire

Department of Business Regulation 725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301


For Respondent: Johnny L. Holmes

c/o Mary's Restaurant 608 Davis Street

Jacksonville, Florida 32209


ISSUES


The issues in this instance are presented through a Notice to Show Cause/Administrative Complaint, in which the Petitioner accuses Respondent, Mary

  1. Hordge, through actions of her agent, servant or employee, Mary Donnovan, of unlawfully selling alcoholic beverages in a manner not permitted by the license, namely the sale for consumption on-premises under the package sales license, contrary to Section 562.12, Florida Statutes.


    FINDINGS OF FACT


    1. Mary E. Hordge, referred to in the Administrative Complaint is the holder of License No. 26-2310, Series No. 2-APS. That type license allows the sale of beer and wine as package sales for consumption off-premises. On- premises consumption is not authorized by that license.


    2. An inspection of the licensed premises was made on June 3, 1983. The licensed premises is in Jacksonville, Florida. The licensed premises was open for business on that date. When the inspector entered, Johnny L. Holmes, son of licensee and business manager of the licensed premises, was seated at a counter

      and an opened can of Coors beer was on the counter in front of him. Another employee of the licensed premises at that time was one Mary Darwell, who is a cook in the licensed premises, and whose other responsibilities include clearing of tables in the bar area. No other conduct was observed related to alcoholic beverages.


      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


    3. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this action. See Section 120.57, Florida Statutes.


    4. Respondent is charged with a violation of Section 562.12, Florida Statutes, which states:


      1. It is unlawful for any person to sell alcoholic beverages without a license, and it is unlawful for any licensee to sell alcoholic beverages except as permitted by his license, or to sell such beverages in any manner except

        that permitted by his license; and any licensee or other person who keeps or possesses alcoholic beverages not permitted to be sold by his license, or not permitted to be sold without a license, with intent to sell or dispose of same

        unlawfully, or who keeps and maintains a place where alcoholic beverages are sold unlawfully, shall be guilty of

        a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or 775.083.


    5. The testimony does not reveal that anyone named Mary Donnovan, Mary Darwell or any other agent, servant or employee sold or intended to sell alcoholic beverages in a manner not permitted by the license. Nor is there any indication that the Respondent sold alcoholic beverages. The existence of the opened can of beer on the bar in front of the business manager does not reach the level of proof necessary to establish a sale of alcoholic beverages in the licensed premises without benefit of license, to be consumed on those premises. Consequently, no violation has been proven.


Based upon a consideration of the facts and the conclusions of law reached, it is recommended that a final order be entered which dismisses this case.

DONE and ENTERED this24th day of January, 1984, in Tallahassee, Florida.


CHARLES C. ADAMS

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building

2009 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of January, 1984.


COPIES FURNISHED:


James N. Watson, Jr., Esquire Department of Business Regulation 725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Ms. Mary E. Hordge c/o Mary's Restaurant 608 Davis Street

Jacksonville, Florida 32209


Howard M. Rasmussen Executive Director Division of Alcoholic

Beverages and Tobacco 725 South Bronough Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Docket for Case No: 83-003033
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 24, 1984 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 83-003033
Issue Date Document Summary
Jan. 24, 1984 Recommended Order Dismiss. There was no proof employee was in fact an employee and open beer can does not prove consumption on package premiums was taking place.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer