STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IRA SOCHET, d/b/a )
ROCKY CREEK VILLAGE, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 90-0543
) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ) REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
A hearing was convened in this case in Tampa, Florida on May 22, 1990, before Arnold H. Pollock, a Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Was not present and was not
represented by counsel.
For Respondent: Edward A. Haman, Esquire
DHRS, Office of Licensure and Certification
7827 North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, Florida 33614
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES
The issue for consideration was to be whether Petitioner was properly denied a license to operate an Adult Congregate Living Facility, (ACLF), with Limited Nursing Service.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
By letter dated October 4, 1989, Connie D. Cheren, Director of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services', (Department), Office of Licensure and Certification, advised Petitioner's representative, William Lupo, Administrator of Rocky Creek Village, that the facility's application for a license to operate as an ACLF with Limited Nursing Service, (LNS), was denied for the reasons stated therein. In a response letter dated October 25, 1989, Mr. Lupo, on behalf of Petitioner, requested a formal hearing, and on January 26, 1990, the file was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings for appointment of a Hearing Officer.
After response by Respondent to the Division's Initial Order, Hearing Officer J. Lawrence Johnston, by Notice of Hearing dated March 5, 1990 set the case for hearing on April 17, 1990 in Tampa. Mr. Johnston thereafter, in
response to the Department's Request For Continuance on March 23, 1990, reset the case for hearing on May 22, 1990, at which time it was convened by the undersigned to whom it had been reassigned in the interim.
At the date, time and place scheduled for the hearing, the Department's representative and witnesses, the undersigned, and the court reporter were present and ready to proceed. Notwithstanding the undersigned allowed Petitioner or his representative an additional half hour, no one appeared for Petitioner, and when the undersigned placed a call to Petitioner's office, he was advised that Petitioner had communicated to "someone in Tallahassee" the fact that he no longer desired a hearing. No such communication was received by either the undersigned or counsel for the Department.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner presented no evidence, nor did the Department.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter in this case. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.
Petitioner had the burden to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, his entitlement to the license requested He presented no evidence in support of his position and thereby failed to satisfy his burden.
Based on the foregoing, it is, therefore:
RECOMMENDED that a Final Order be entered denying Petitioner's application for licensure as an ACLF with LNS.
RECOMMENDED this 18th day of June, 1990, in Tallahassee, Florida.
ARNOLD H. POLLOCK, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 18th day of June, 1990.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Edward A. Haman, Esquire DHRS, Office of Licensure and
Certification
7827 North Dale Mabry Highway Tampa, Florida 33614
William Lupo Administrator
Rocky Creek Village 8606 Boulder Court
Tampa, Florida 33615
John Miller General Counsel DHRS
1323 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
Sam Power Agency Clerk DHRS
1323 Winewood Blvd.
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jun. 18, 1990 | Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 27, 1990 | Agency Final Order | |
Jun. 18, 1990 | Recommended Order | Denied applicant for license to operate an Adult Congregate Living Facility who fails to show up at requested hearing does not establish entitlement to license. |