STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
COUNTY LINE COALITION, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 91-4103
) MAD HATTER UTILITY, INC., and ) STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT ) OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Based upon the Motion to Dismiss, the Motion to Strike and Responses hereto, along with the filed memorandums and arguments of counsel and the duly qualified representative, the undersigned finds:
1 On February 4, 1991, the Department of Environmental Regulation issued a Notice Of Intent To Issue Permit No. DC51-181550.
Pursuant to Rule 17-103.150(3), Florida Administrative Code, the Department's proposed agency action was published by Mad Hatter Utility, Inc., in The Tampa Tribune on February 16, 1991. This public notice strictly complied with the information requirements set forth in the aforementioned rule.
The Petitioners in these consolidated cases did not receive actual notice of the Department's intent to issue until after the 21 day point of entry period allowed by Rule 17-103.150(3)(d), Florida Administrative Code, had passed.
Rule 17-103.150(3)(d), Florida Administrative Code, enlarges the time period of 14 days set forth in Section 403.815, Florida Statutes, which governs the time period allowed for a petition for an administrative hearing to be filed by persons whose substantial interests are affected by the proposed agency action.
Failure to file a petition within the 21 days following the published public notice constitutes a waiver of any right to a hearing under Section 120.57, Florida Statutes.
Inherent in the original Notice Of Intent To Issue is the requirement that Mad Hatter Utility, Inc., comply with Rules 17-610.417 and 17-610.421(3), Florida Administrative Code, because the Notice Of Intent requires the applicant to comply with the Department's rules regarding the operation and maintenance of the system under General Permit Condition No. 6. As a result, the Modification Of Conditions Permit No. DC51- 181550 issued by the Department on June 3, 1991, has been misnamed. The document merely recites the contents of Rules 17-
610.417 and 17-610.421(3), Florida Administrative Code, which were always part of the permit conditions. This document is not a "modification," it's a
"redundancy." At no time was the applicant exempt from these specific rule requirements. See Rule 17-103.160, Florida Administrative Code.
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED:
The request for an administrative hearing as to Permit No. DC51-181550 be dismissed as the right to a hearing under Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, has been waived according to Rule 17-103.150(3)(d), Florida Administrative Code.
The request for an administrative hearing as to the two specific conditions set forth in the permit modification designated as Permit No. DC51- 181550A be dismissed because these two specific conditions were already required in the original permit under the general conditions. While specifically setting forth these permit conditions for an applicant may be prudent, it is also redundant. The Petitioners in Case Nos. 91-4103 and 91-4104 do not get a second point of entry to request a hearing under Section 120.57, Florida Statutes, because of the Department's misuse of the term "permit modifications." Such a result would deny the applicant the rights and interests acquired through the original permitting process.
DONE and ENTERED this 13th day of November, 1991, in Tallahassee, Florida.
VERONICA E. DONNELLY
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings The Desoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1550
(904) 488-9675
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 13th day of November, 1991.
COPIES FURNISHED:
ROBERT S WISE ESQ 3418 HANDY RD STE 204
TAMPA FL 33618
DIANE D TREMOR ESQ
ROSE SUNDSTROM & BENTLEY 2548 BLAIRSTONE PINES DR TALLAHASSEE FL 32301
W DOUGLAS BEASON ESQ ASST GENERAL COUNSEL DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REG 2600 BLAIRSTONE RD
TALLAHASSEE FL 32399
JAMES KAUCHICK
LAKE KELL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSN PO BOX 1666
LUTZ FL 33549
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Dec. 24, 1991 | Final Order filed. |
Nov. 13, 1991 | Recommended Order of Dismissal sent out. (File not closed). |
Nov. 13, 1991 | Recommended Order of Dismissal sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held |
Nov. 08, 1991 | (Petitioner) Memorandum of County Line Coalition, Inc. filed. |
Nov. 07, 1991 | Response of Mad Hatter Utility, Inc. to Order Requiring Memorandums from Parties filed. (From Diane Tremor) |
Nov. 07, 1991 | Department of Environmental Regulation's Memorandum of Law filed. |
Nov. 04, 1991 | Order Requiring Memorandums from Parties sent out. |
Sep. 24, 1991 | Notice of Telephonic Hearing (November 1, 1991: 1:00 pm) sent out. |
Sep. 18, 1991 | Mad Hatter Utility, Inc.'s Reply to Response of County Line Coalition, Inc. filed. (From Diane D. Tremor) |
Sep. 13, 1991 | (Petitioner) Response to County Line Coalition, Inc. to Motion for Summary Recommended Order of Dismissal filed. (From Robert S. Wise) |
Aug. 26, 1991 | Mad Hatter Utility, Inc.`s Reply to DER`S Response to Motions for Summary Recommended Orders of Dismissal filed. (From Diane Tremor) |
Aug. 20, 1991 | Order Requiring Written Response to Pending Motions for Summary Recommended Order of Dismissal sent out. |
Aug. 16, 1991 | Department of Environmental Regulation`s Response to Motions to Dismiss filed. (From Doug Beason) |
Jul. 29, 1991 | (Respondent) Motion for Summary Recommended Order of Dismissal w/Exhibits A-D filed. (From Richard D. Garrity) |
Jul. 24, 1991 | Order of Consolidation sent out. (for 91-4103 & 91-4104) |
Jul. 24, 1991 | Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 11/20/91; 9:30am; Tampa) |
Jul. 19, 1991 | Ltr. to VED from Floyd L. DeForest re: Reply to Initial Order filed. |
Jul. 09, 1991 | Initial Order issued. |
Jul. 03, 1991 | (DER) Motion to Consolidate (with DOAH Case No/s. 91-4103 & 91-4104) filed. |
Jul. 02, 1991 | Request for Assignment of Hearing Officer and Notice of Preservation of Record; Agency Notice of Permit; Request for Formal Administrative Hearing, letter form filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Nov. 13, 1991 | Recommended Order | Modification of permit conditions issued by Department of Environmental Regulation (DER) did not reopen permit review as modification merely recited rule requirements always applied to permit. |