Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RONALD WAGNER vs BURGER KING CORPORATION, 95-001480 (1995)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 95-001480 Visitors: 12
Petitioner: RONALD WAGNER
Respondent: BURGER KING CORPORATION
Judges: RICHARD A. HIXSON
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Mar. 24, 1995
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, July 27, 1995.

Latest Update: Jul. 27, 1995
Summary: Whether Respondent's Motion to Dismiss should be granted for failure of Petitioner to comply with reasonable discovery, and for Petitioner's failure to prosecute this matter.Dismissal of human relations commission complaint warranted for failure to comply with discovery and orders of DOAH.
95-1480

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


RONALD WAGNER, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 95-1480

)

BURGER KING CORPORATION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Richard Hixson, held a telephone conference hearing on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss in this case on July 13, 1995, in Tallahassee, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Ronald Wagner

2215 Buttercup Court

Lakeland, Florida 33801


For Respondent: James R. Wiley, Esquire

Cathleen G. Bell, Esquire Post Office Box 3239 Tampa, Florida 33601


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


Whether Respondent's Motion to Dismiss should be granted for failure of Petitioner to comply with reasonable discovery, and for Petitioner's failure to prosecute this matter.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. On January 12, 1995, the Florida Commission on Human Relations (Commission) entered a Determination of No Cause with regard to a complaint filed by Petitioner, Ronald Wagner, against Respondent, Burger King Corporation, alleging unlawful employment practices.


  2. On March 24, 1995, the Commission, in accordance with Rule 60Y- 4.016(1), Florida Administrative Code, and pursuant to the request of Petitioner, transmitted the matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings for formal hearing.


  3. Formal Hearing in this case is presently scheduled for August 10 and 11, 1995.

  4. On June 27, 1995, the Hearing Officer directed the parties to comply with certain prehearing procedures, and to file a prehearing stipulation on or before August 4, 1995.


  5. Respondent on May 31, 1995, propounded written interrogatories to Petitioner, and noticed Petitioner for deposition on July 18, 1994.


  6. Petitioner failed to respond to Respondent's interrogatories, failed to appear for his deposition, and, despite reasonable efforts undertaken by his counsel, failed to respond to his counsel's attempts to contact him regarding this case. Due to Petitioner's failure to comply with discovery, the parties have been unable to comply with the Hearing Officer's Order of June 27, 1995.


  7. On July 10, 1995, counsel for Petitioner filed an amended Motion for Withdrawal due to Petitioner's failure to maintain contact with his counsel.


  8. On July 11, 1995, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for failure to comply with discovery.


  9. A telephone hearing was held on July 13, 1995, on both motions. By order entered July 14, 1995, counsel for Petitioner was granted leave to withdraw, and Petitioner was directed to show cause by July 24, 1995, as to why Respondent's Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. The Order to Show Cause was mailed to Petitioner at his home address as contained in the DOAH files which was confirmed as accurate by Petitioner's counsel.


  10. Petitioner has not filed any response to the Order to Show Cause.


  11. Petitioner has abandoned the prosecution of this matter.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  12. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter of and the parties to this action pursuant to Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.


  13. Petitioner has neither complied with reasonable discovery requests, nor the orders of the DOAH. Dismissal of the Petition is appropriate under these circumstance. A Professional Nurse, Inc. v.HRS, 519 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).


  14. Petitioner has failed to maintain contact with counsel, has not otherwise appeared in this case, and has abandoned prosecution of this matter.


RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that:


The Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED, and the Commission enter its Final Order dismissing the Petition filed herein.

RECOMMENDED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 27th day of July, 1995.



RICHARD HIXSON

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 27th day of July, 1995.



COPIES FURNISHED:


Ronald Wagner

2215 Buttercup Court

Lakeland, FL 33801


Joseph N. Baron, Esq. Building A

3375 U.S. Highway 98 South

Lakeland, FL 33803-8365


James R. Wiley, Esq. Cathleen G. Bell, Esq. Post Office Box 3239 Tampa, FL 33601


Sharon Moultry, Clerk Human Relations Commission Building F, Suite 240

325 John Knox Road Tallahassee, FL 32303-4149


Dana Baird, General Counsel Human Relations Commission Building F, Suite 240

325 John Knox Road Tallahassee, FL 32303-4149


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions to the Recommended Order. All agencies allow each party at least 10 days in which to submit written exceptions. Some agencies allow a larger period within which to submit written exceptions. You should consult with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case concerning their rules on the deadline for filing exceptions to this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 95-001480
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 27, 1995 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 07/13/95.
Jul. 19, 1995 Respondent`s Supplemental Authority In Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Petition for Relief filed.
Jul. 14, 1995 Order Granting Amended Motion to Withdraw And Order to Show Cause sent out. (parties to show cause why this case should not be closed, must file reply no later than 7/24/95)
Jul. 11, 1995 Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss Petition for Relief w/cover letter filed.
Jul. 10, 1995 (Petitioner) Amended Motion for Withdrawal of Petitioner`s Counsel filed.
Jun. 30, 1995 (Petitioner) Motion for Withdrawal of Petitioner`s Counsel; Order Allowing Withdrawal of Counsel (for HEARING OFFICER signature); Cover Letter filed.
Jun. 29, 1995 (Respondent) Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum filed.
Jun. 27, 1995 Prehearing Order sent out.
Apr. 28, 1995 Letter to HEARING OFFICER from James R. Wiley Re: Request for copy of file filed.
Apr. 26, 1995 Confirmation letter to Court Reporter from HEARING OFFICER`s secretary re: hearing date sent out. (Court Reporter: Susan Slattery)
Apr. 26, 1995 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for August 10-11, 1995; 9:30am; Tallahassee)
Apr. 17, 1995 Parties` Joint Response to Initial Order w/cover letter filed.
Apr. 04, 1995 Initial Order issued.
Mar. 27, 1995 Answer To Petition For Relief filed.
Mar. 24, 1995 Transmittal of Petition; Charge of Discrimination; Notice of Determination: No Cause; Determination: No Cause; Petition for Relief; Notice to Respondent of Filing of Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice; Response To (4.) Summary Of Inv

Orders for Case No: 95-001480
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 27, 1995 Recommended Order Dismissal of human relations commission complaint warranted for failure to comply with discovery and orders of DOAH.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer