Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BOARD OF MEDICINE vs DANIEL H. KULICK, 96-005687 (1996)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 96-005687 Visitors: 26
Petitioner: BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: DANIEL H. KULICK
Judges: ROBERT E. MEALE
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Cape Coral, Florida
Filed: Dec. 03, 1996
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, June 4, 1997.

Latest Update: Sep. 12, 1997
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of being unable to practice as a physician assistant with reasonable skill and safety due to illness or use of alcohol or drugs, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(s); inappropriately prescribing medicine to family members by using the name of his supervising physician, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(q); and engaging in fraud in the practice of medicine by obtaining controlled substances through fraudulent means, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(k)
More
96-5687

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE )

ADMINISTRATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 96-5687

)

DANIEL KULICK, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Robert E. Meale, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, conducted the final hearing in Ft.

Myers, Florida, on March 20, 1997.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Joseph S. Garwood

Senior Attorney

Agency for Health Care Administration Post Office Box 14229

Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229 For Respondent: no appearance

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of being unable to practice as a physician assistant with reasonable skill and safety due to illness or use of alcohol or drugs, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(s); inappropriately prescribing medicine to family members by using the name of his supervising physician, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(q); and engaging in fraud in the practice of medicine by obtaining controlled substances through

fraudulent means, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(k). If so, an additional issue is what penalty should be imposed.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By Administrative Complaint dated October 24, 1996, Petitioner alleged that Respondent was a certified physician assistant. When he appli7ed to the Board of Medicine to be certified as a physician assistant, the Board referred Respondent to the Physicians’ Recovery Network for evaluation due to his history of impairment.

The Administrative Complaint alleges that the Physicians’ Recovery Network referred Respondent to a psychiatrist specializing in the evaluation of impaired health care professionals. The psychiatrist completed his evaluation of Respondent by May 5, 1995, and determined that Respondent had a long history of drug addiction and had opiates present in his urine.

After the Board of Medicine denied Respondent’s application for certification, Respondent allegedly was treated by Dr. Goetz at Charter Glade Hospital. On August 8, 1995, Dr. Goetz determined that Respondent was safe to return to work.

The Administrative Complaint alleges that, on September 11, 1995, Respondent signed a five-year contract with the Physicians’ Recovery Network under which he agreed to undergo random drug screens; abstain from drug use; undergo monitoring by a physician; undergo psychiatric treatment; notify the Physicians’

Recovery Network of any change in address, employment, or mental or physical health; participate in Alcoholics Anonymous and group therapy; and withdraw from practice for evaluation at the request of the Physicians’ Recovery Network.

The Administrative Complaint alleges that the Board of Medicine granted Respondent a physician assistant license on September 26, 1995, provided Respondent complied with the conditions of his contract.

According to the Administrative Complaint, on or about August 1, 1996, Respondent changed his address without notifying the Physicians’ Recovery Network; obtained controlled substances by fraudulent means at the Lee County hospital where he worked; was terminated from his job at the hospital after threatening two patients and stalking a third; and failed to notify the Physicians’ Recovery Network of the change in employment.

The Administrative Complaint alleges that, on or about August 15, 1996, the Physicians’ Recovery Network contacted Respondent and directed him to report to his psychiatrist’s office immediately, but Respondent refused. At this time, Respondent’s wife discovered that he had obtained prescribed controlled substances by fraudulently using her name.

The Administrative Complaint alleges that Respondent is guilty of being unable to practice as a physician assistant with reasonable skill and safety, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(s); inappropriately prescribing legend drugs to family

members, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(q); and engaging in fraud in the practice of medicine by obtaining controlled substances for himself using the names of family members and his supervising physician, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(k).

On November 8, 1996, Respondent filed a letter disputing the material facts and demanding a formal hearing.

At the hearing, Petitioner called four witnesses and offered into evidence four exhibits, including a late-filed deposition transcript. All exhibits were admitted. Respondent did not appear.

The court reporter did not file the transcript. Petitioner filed a proposed recommended order on April 25, 1997.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. At all material times, Respondent has been licensed as a physician assistant, holding license number PA 0002975.

  2. When applying for his license, Respondent supplied the Board of Medicine with certain information that resulted in a referral of Respondent to the Physician’s Recovery Network (PRN) for a psychiatric evaluation.

  3. The initial evaluation was completed on May 5, 1995. The evaluating psychiatrist determined that Respondent suffered from opiate dependency, probably as a result of some injuries that he had suffered years earlier. The psychiatrist concluded that Respondent could undergo outpatient treatment in an intensive program where he would be seen 3-5 times weekly.

  4. At the end of May, on the advice of the evaluating psychiatrist, Respondent entered a six-week intensive outpatient treatment in a chemical dependency program at Charter Glade Hospital. He also commenced attending meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous and undergoing random drug screens.

  5. For the summer of 1995, Respondent had drug-free urine and seemed to be doing well. The evaluating psychiatrist informed the PRN that Respondent could safely return to practice, and the Board of Medicine certified Respondent to practice as a physician assistant.

  6. By early summer, 1996, the evaluating psychiatrist, who had continued seeing Respondent, began to suspect that something was not quite right with him. Respondent had begun acting hypomanically, developing, for example, a get-rich-quick scheme that was not well-founded in reality.

  7. During the summer of 1996, Respondent began using the name of his supervising physician to call in prescriptions for Vicodin, Trimox, and Ultram in the name of Respondent’s wife. These were fraudulent acts to gain possession of these narcotics for use by Respondent.

  8. Respondent’s physician employer terminated Respondent’s employment in June 1996 following bizarre behavior on Respondent’s part in professional settings involving patients and prospective patients.

  9. Respondent resisted all efforts by his evaluating psychiatrist to undergo reevaluation and retreatment, if necessary. Instead, Respondent became highly suspicious and unstable.

  10. On October 4, 1996, Petitioner entered an order of emergency suspension of Respondent’s license.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. (All references to Sections are to Florida Statutes.)

  12. Section 458.347(11) provides that the Board of Medicine may revoke or suspend the certificate of a physician assistant if he has violated any provisions of Chapter 458.

  13. Section 458.331(2) authorizes the Board of Medicine to revoke, suspend, or otherwise discipline the license of any person guilty of a violation of Section 458.331(1).

  14. Section 458.331(1)(k) prohibits making “deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in or related to the practice of medicine.”

  15. Section 458.331(1)(q) prohibits “prescribing . . . a legend drug . . . other than in the course of the physician’s professional practice.”

  16. Petitioner must prove the material allegations by clear and convincing evidence. Department of Banking and Finance v.

    Osborne Stern and Company, Inc., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996) and Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987).

  17. Petitioner has proved that Respondent has violated Sections 458.331(k)(1) and (q). Respondent’s failure to respond to repeated attempts to engage him in a constructive effort to address the recurrence of his evident drug problem necessitates revocation of his certificate as a physician assistant.


RECOMMENDATION


It is


RECOMMENDED that the Board of Medicine enter a final order revoking Respondent’s certificate as a physician assistant.

ENTERED in Tallahassee, Florida, on June 4, 1997.


ROBERT E. MEALE

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (904) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings on June 4, 1997.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Joseph S. Garwood Senior Attorney

Agency for Health Care Administration Post Office Box 14229

Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229

Daniel Kulick

4641 Southwest Santa Barbara Place Cape Coral, Florida 33914


Dr. Marm Harris, Executive Director Board of Medicine

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792


Jerome Hoffman, General Counsel Agency for Health Care Administration 2727 Mahan Drive

Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5403


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order must be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 96-005687
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 12, 1997 Final Order filed.
Jul. 03, 1997 (Petitioner) Motion for Substitution of Party; Order of Substitution of Party (for judge signature) (filed via facsimile).
Jun. 04, 1997 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 03/20/97.
Apr. 25, 1997 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Apr. 23, 1997 cc: Deposition of Dr. Jeffrey M. Haller, D.O. filed.
Apr. 22, 1997 Deposition of Dr. Jeffrey M. Haller, D.O. filed.
Mar. 31, 1997 (AHCA) Notice of Taking Deposition (filed via facsimile).
Mar. 20, 1997 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Mar. 14, 1997 (Petitioner) Motion for Leave to Submit After-Filed Deposition filed.
Mar. 07, 1997 Order Granting Change of Venue and Amended Notice of Hearing as to Location Only sent out.
Mar. 05, 1997 (Petitioner) Motion for Change of Venue (filed via facsimile).
Jan. 22, 1997 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/20/97; 9:00am; Ft. Myers)
Jan. 22, 1997 Order Granting Motion for Continuance sent out.
Jan. 07, 1997 (Petitioner) Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 23, 1996 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 1/22/97; 9:00 A.M.; Ft. Myers)
Dec. 18, 1996 Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 11, 1996 Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 09, 1996 Initial Order issued.
Dec. 03, 1996 Agency Referral Letter; Notice of Appearance; Administrative Complaint; Request for Formal Hearing, Letter Form (filed via facsimile).

Orders for Case No: 96-005687
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 11, 1997 Agency Final Order
Jun. 04, 1997 Recommended Order Recommended revocation for fraudulent prescriptions of narcotics by physician assistant.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer