Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TELLO FARMS, INC. vs S & G SALES, INC., AND NEW YORK SURETY COMPANY, 98-004121 (1998)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 98-004121 Visitors: 7
Petitioner: TELLO FARMS, INC.
Respondent: S & G SALES, INC., AND NEW YORK SURETY COMPANY
Judges: ROBERT E. MEALE
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Sep. 18, 1998
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, January 25, 1999.

Latest Update: Mar. 18, 1999
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent S & G Sales, Inc., owes money to Petitioner in connection with the purchase of agricultural products.Petitioner failed to prove it was due additional money for products sold to dealer.
98-4121.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


TELLO FARMS, INC., )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 98-4121A

) S & G SALES, INC., and NEW ) YORK SURETY COMPANY, )

)

Respondents. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Robert E. Meale, Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, conducted the final hearing by videoconference in Tallahassee, Florida, on December 21, 1998.

The parties, attorney for Respondent, witnesses, and court reporter participated by videoconference in Fort Myers, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Juan Tello

Qualified Representative Tello Farms, Inc.

Post Office Box 8154 Naples, Florida 34101-8154


For Respondent S & G Sales, Inc.:

Carolann A. Swanson Roetzel & Andress

2320 First Street, Suite 1000 Fort Myers, Florida 33901


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Respondent S & G Sales, Inc., owes money to Petitioner in connection with the purchase of agricultural products.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By Complaint dated June 18, 1998, Petitioner alleged that Respondent S & G Sales, Inc., owed it $15,368.70 for pickles that it had purchased in April and May 1998. Respondent S & G Sales, Inc., denied owing the money.

At the hearing, Petitioner called one witness and offered into evidence one exhibit. Respondent called two witnesses and offered into evidence six exhibits. All exhibits were admitted. However, Petitioner did not file its exhibit following the hearing, so the exhibit is deemed withdrawn.

The parties did not order a transcript.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner produces agricultural products in Naples, Florida. Petitioner and Respondent S & G Sales, Inc. (Respondent) entered into an agreement in which Respondent would market Petitioner's pickles for the best available price.

  2. However, the agreement did not require Respondent to sell the pickles only for market price. The agreement required only that Respondent use its best efforts in marketing the pickles.

  3. In April and May 1998, Petitioner delivered to Respondent numerous shipments of pickles pursuant to the parties' agreement. Quality and sizing problems in the pickles prevented Respondent from being able to obtain market price.

  4. Pickles are perishable. They can go from acceptable quality to rotten in as little as two days. Respondent's representative weekly informed Petitioner's representative of the below-market prices that he was obtaining for the pickles.

  5. The record is somewhat confusing because Petitioner seeks additional payment for some, but not all, shipments of pickles, and Respondent made periodic advances for all the pickle shipments plus shipments of squash also. However, the evidence is clear that Respondent was required to get only the best available price and, due to quality and size problems did so.

    The evidence is also clear that Respondent paid at least as much as it owed Petitioner for the pickle shipments covered in the present claim.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  6. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter. Sections 120.57(1) and 604.21(6), Florida Statutes. (All references to Sections are to Florida Statutes.)

  7. Petitioner bears the burden of proof. Department of Transportation v. J. W. C. Company, Inc., 396 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

  8. Petitioner's claim for $15,368.70 ignores the parties' agreement and the condition and size of the pickles that Petitioner supplied Respondent. Respondent used its best effort to sell the pickles at the best available price and has paid what

it owes Petitioner. Respondent's counterclaim for additional sums due is outside the jurisdiction of this proceeding.

RECOMMENDATION


It is


RECOMMENDED that the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services enter a final order dismissing Petitioner's complaint.

DONE AND ENTERED this 25th day of January, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


ROBERT E. MEALE

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 25th day of January, 1999.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Mr. Joseph Monahan

New York Surety Company

123 William Street

New York, New York 10038-3804


Juan Tello

Qualified Representative Tello Farms, Inc.

Post Office Box 8154 Naples, Florida 34101-8154


Carolann A. Swanson Roetzel & Andress

2320 First Street, Suite 1000 Fort Myers, Florida 33901


Honorable Bob Crawford Commissioner

Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

The Capitol, Plaza Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0810 Richard Tritschler

General Counsel

Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services

The Capitol, Plaza Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0810


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order must be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 98-004121
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 18, 1999 Final Order filed.
Feb. 12, 1999 Respondent`s Written Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Jan. 25, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 12/21/98.
Jan. 19, 1999 Letter to Judge Meale from J. Tello Re: Requesting S&G Sales pay "best market price" filed.
Jan. 15, 1999 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 30, 1998 S&G Sales Exhibit Index; Exhibits w/cover letter filed.
Dec. 22, 1998 Letter to Judge Meale from B. Hyatt (RE: notice of address change) filed.
Dec. 21, 1998 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 18, 1998 Letter J. Tello from Carolann Swanson (RE: notice of change of hearing time) filed.
Dec. 17, 1998 Order Denying Motion for Continuance of Hearing and Renewed Motion for Continuance of Hearing sent out.
Dec. 14, 1998 (Respondent) Renewed Motion for Continuance of Hearing (filed via facsimile).
Dec. 14, 1998 (Respondent) Motion for Continuance of Hearing (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 23, 1998 (C. Swanson) Request to Produce; Notice of Serving Respondent`s, S & G Sales, Inc., First Set of Interrogatories on Petitioner, Tello Farms, Inc., filed.
Nov. 02, 1998 Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 12/21/98; 9:00am; Ft. Myers & Tallahassee)
Oct. 05, 1998 (Respondent) Motion for Enalrgement of Time in Which to File the Joint Response to Initial Order and Notice of Change of Address (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 22, 1998 Initial Order issued.
Sep. 18, 1998 Agency referral letter; Respondent S&G Sales, Inc.`s Motion for Hearing; (Agency) Order; Complaint; Notice of Filing of A Complaint; Supportive Letters & Documents filed.

Orders for Case No: 98-004121
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 17, 1999 Agency Final Order
Jan. 25, 1999 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to prove it was due additional money for products sold to dealer.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer