Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SHERILL P. GOMEZ vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, 98-005078 (1998)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 98-005078 Visitors: 11
Petitioner: SHERILL P. GOMEZ
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Judges: MARY CLARK
Agency: Department of Children and Family Services
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Nov. 17, 1998
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, May 7, 1999.

Latest Update: Jun. 24, 1999
Summary: The issue for disposition in this proceeding is whether Petitioner is entitled to relicensure as a family day-care home.Despite training and warnings, Petitioner left children, including an infant, in the yard unattended when she went inside house. Deny provisional family day care home license.
98-5078.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


SHERILL P. GOMEZ, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 98-5078

)

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND )

FAMILY SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly-designated Administrative Law Judge, Mary Clark, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case on March 31, 1999, by videoconference. The Administrative Law Judge presided from Tallahassee, Florida; the parties, their witnesses, and the court reporter participated from Orlando, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Sherill Gomez

3689 Penshurst Place

Kissimmee, Florida 34758


For Respondent: Carmen M. Sierra, Esquire

Department of Children and Family Services

400 West Robinson Street Suite S-1106

Orlando, Florida 32801 STATEMENT OF ISSUES

The issue for disposition in this proceeding is whether Petitioner is entitled to relicensure as a family day-care home.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On October 13, 1998, the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) notified Ms. Gomez that her application for a family day-care home was denied for failure to meet minimum standards required by Chapter 402, Florida Statutes.

Specifically, the notification letter cited violations regarding supervision of children in the home.

Ms. Gomez requested a formal evidentiary hearing and the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings.

At the hearing Ms. Gomez testified in her own behalf and presented a single exhibit, a videotape of her home. That exhibit, marked and received as Petitioner's Exhibit No. 1, has been viewed and considered by the Administrative Law Judge.

DCFS presented the testimony of Barbara Ivey and Kathy Swaggerty. DCFS also presented a copy of Ms. Gomez's prior provisional license and Barbara Ivey's inspection report, marked and received in evidence as Respondent's Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2.

Neither party filed a proposed recommended order nor filed the transcript.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Sherill Gomez resides in Kissimmee, Osceola County, Florida, and had a provisional license to operate a family day- care home at her residence. The license was issued on April 13, 1998, and expired six months later on October 13, 1998.

  2. In 1989, Ms. Gomez was involved in an incident of child neglect. She had been babysitting in her home and left two children under the age of 3 sleeping but unattended when she went out shopping. In her absence a 2 1/2-year-old, Andre, got out the door and was picked up by the police. When Ms. Gomez returned she called the police and learned that they had Andre. Apparently all she knew about the child's mother was that she worked at Disney Village.

  3. Ms. Gomez took a three-hour course for family day-care and received explicit instructions regarding her duty to provide adult supervision at all times, both inside and outside the house. When she applied for licensure and assured DCFS that the 1989 incident never would occur again, the licensing supervisor, Kathy Swaggerty, agreed to a six-month provisional license with close agency scrutiny of the home during that period.

  4. During the provisional license period, Barbara Ivey inspected Ms. Gomez's home several times, both announced and unannounced. She found several violations in July 1998 regarding record-keeping, bedding for the children, and access to unsafe items such as bleach, kitty litter, a weed-wacker, bicycles, and barbeque grills. Concerned that Ms. Gomez did not understand her obligation, Ms. Ivey spent about two and one-half hours with her

    on that visit explaining the rules. Ms. Ivey also explained the importance of adequate supervision.

  5. Ms. Ivey returned on August 5, 1998, and found some violations had been corrected, but there were still problems with two of the children's records; the bicycles were still accessible, and the carpet was dirty. On a subsequent visit in August everything but a nutrition card for one infant had been corrected. Ms. Ivey and Ms. Gomez discussed supervision again and Ms. Ivey emphasized that with one adult caregiver all of the children needed to be in the house or out in the play yard together.

  6. Ms. Gomez applied for relicensure and Ms. Ivey scheduled another inspection visit on September 30, 1998, shortly before the provisional license was due to expire.

  7. Ms. Ivey arrived at the home and was admitted by


    Ms. Gomez, who led her into the kitchen area where there was a round table with chairs in front of a large picture window looking onto the backyard. Through the window Ms. Ivey could see two children, ages 3 and 4 years, playing in the yard. A 5-month old infant was in a carry-all near the table in the kitchen.

    Ms. Ivey told Ms. Gomez that the children needed to come in.


    Ms. Gomez said that the children were all right, that they could

    be watched through the window, but Ms. Ivey insisted that the children should come in.

  8. When Ms. Ivey went out the backdoor she found another child, an infant, sitting alone on the patio out of view of the window and unable to be observed from inside the house. The backyard is not fenced and leads into a wooded area. The infant could have crawled away into that area.

  9. After the children were brought inside Ms. Ivey continued with her inspection but explained that the lack of supervision was a problem. Ms. Gomez also had six children enrolled, a number which was in excess of her approved capacity when her own child was home from school. In the October 13, 1998, license denial letter, inadequate supervision was the specific basis for DCFS' finding that Ms. Gomez's home failed to meet minimum standards.

  10. At the hearing Ms. Gomez explained that the reason the children were left alone is that she had to go the door when

    Ms. Ivey arrived. This explanation does not justify her leaving the infant alone unobserved on the patio nor does it justify

    Ms. Gomez's delay in retrieving the children after Ms. Ivey's arrival. Moreover, under DCFS standards, she should have brought all of the children inside when she went into the house.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction in this proceeding pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  12. In this case, Ms. Gomez has the ultimate burden of proving her entitlement to the license she seeks; DCFS has the burden of proving that she committed the violations that would make her unfit for licensure. Department of Banking and Finance, Division of Securities and Investor Protection v. Osborne Stern and Co., 670 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1996).

  13. Section 402.313, Florida Statutes, authorizes DCFS to license family day-care homes. Rule 65C-20.009, Florida Administrative Code, requires that operators of family day-care homes must provide supervision of the children in their care and must be able to respond to the emergencies and needs of children: "During daytime hours of operation children shall have adult supervision which means watching and directing children's activities, both indoors and outdoors, and responding to each child's needs."

  14. DCFS met its burden of proving that Ms. Gomez failed to provide adequate supervision when she left an infant unattended on a patio. Ms. Gomez did not establish her entitlement to licensure.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing, it is


RECOMMENDED: that the Department of Children and Family Services enter its final order denying Sherill Gomez' application for family day-care home licensure.

DONE AND ENTERED this 7th day of May, 1999, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


MARY CLARK

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 7th day of May, 1999.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Sherill Gomez

3689 Penshurst Place

Kissimmee, Florida 34758


Carmen M. Sierra, Esquire Department of Children and

Family Services

400 West Robinson Street Suite S-1106

Orlando, Florida 32801


Gregory D. Venz, Agency Clerk Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700

John S. Slye, General Counsel Department of Children and

Family Services Building 2, Room 204

1317 Winewood Boulevard

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 98-005078
Issue Date Proceedings
Jun. 24, 1999 Final Order filed.
May 07, 1999 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 03/31/99.
Apr. 08, 1999 (Respondent) Exhibits filed.
Mar. 31, 1999 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Mar. 25, 1999 Joint Prehearing Statement filed.
Feb. 02, 1999 Order and Amended Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/31/99; 11:00am; Orlando)
Jan. 25, 1999 Respondent`s Motion for Continuance filed.
Jan. 13, 1999 Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Hearing set for 2/11/99; 8:00am; Orlando & Tallahassee)
Jan. 13, 1999 Order for Prehearing Conference sent out.
Dec. 07, 1998 Respondent`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Nov. 24, 1998 Initial Order issued.
Nov. 17, 1998 Notice; Agency Denial Letter; Request for Hearing (letter form); Supportive Documents filed.

Orders for Case No: 98-005078
Issue Date Document Summary
Jun. 23, 1999 Agency Final Order
May 07, 1999 Recommended Order Despite training and warnings, Petitioner left children, including an infant, in the yard unattended when she went inside house. Deny provisional family day care home license.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer