Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHARMACY
Respondent: PEARL STREET PHARMACY
Judges: P. MICHAEL RUFF
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Jacksonville, Florida
Filed: Feb. 09, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, January 16, 2001.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
ional
eet ll le Bak 3
__, STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH .
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, _
Petitioner, : (O06 AT
vs.
PEARL STREET PHARMACY, Case No. 97-21984
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, hereinafter referred to as “Petitioner,” files
this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Pharmacy against PEARL STREET
PHARMACY, hereinafter referred to as “Respondent,” and alleges:
1. Effective July 1, 1997, Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice: of pharmacy pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996); Chapter 455,
Florida Statutes; and Chapter 465, Florida Statutes.
2 Pursuant to the authority of Section 20. 433)(8), Florida ‘Statutes (Supp. 1997),
the Petitioner has contracted with “the “Agency for “Health Care ‘Administration to provide
consumer, complaint, investigative and prosecutorial services required by the Division of
Medical Quality Assurance, councils, or boards, aS appropriate, including the j issuance of
"emergency orders of suspension or restriction.
3. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a registered pharmacy,
having been issued permit number PH 0000562.
4, Respondent’s last known address i is 312 w. gt St., Jacksonville, FL 32206.
\w/ \ed
5. On or about December 11, 1997, a routine inspection was conducted at Pearl
Street Pharmacy.
6.. This inspection revealed the following deficiencies in the pharmacy:
a. technician was not wearing the proper identification while
working; ;
b. pharmacist could not produce all DEA 222 forms; of the
forms that were produced, many were missing the date
received, the quantity received, or both;
Cc. pharmacist could not produce a signature log or daily hard-
copy print out.
COUNT I
7. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations
contained in paragraphs one (1) through six (6) as if fully stated herin.
8. Based on the foregoing, Respondent is subject to discipline pursuant to Section
465.023(1)(c), Florida Statutes, by violating Rule 64B16-27.410, Florida Administrative Code,
which states that all pharmacy technicians shall identify themselves as pharmacy technicians by
wearing a type of identification badge that is clearly visible which specifically identifies the
employee by name and by status as a “pharmacy technician.”
COUNT II
9. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations
contained in paragraphs one (1) through six (6) as if fully stated herin.
10. - 1 on th foregoing, Respondent ‘is subject to discipline pursuant to Section
465,023(1)(@), by violating Section 893.07(2), Florida Statutes, which states that the record of
controlled substances received shall in every case show the date of receipt and the quantity of
controlled substances received.
w .—)
COUNT II .
11. Petitioner realleges and’ incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations
contained in paragraphs one (1) through six (9) as if fully stated herin.
12 ‘Based on the foregoing, Respondent is subject to discipline pursuant to Section
465.016(1)(n), Florida Statutes, for violating a rule of the board; specifically, Rule 64B16-
28.140(3)(c), (), or (€), Florida Administrative Code. Section (c) states that the daily hard-copy
printout shall be maintained in a separate file at the pharmacy and that the records of controlled
‘substances shall be readily retrievable from records of non-controlled substances. Section (d)
states that each individual pharmacist who dispenses or refills a prescription drug order shall
verify that the data indicated on the daily hard-copy printout is correct, by. dating and signing
such document in the same manner as signing a check or legal document within seven days from
the date of dispensing. Section (e) states that in lieu of producing a hard-copy printout, the
pharmacy shall maintain a log book in which each individual pharmacist using the data
processing system shall sign a statement each day, attesting to the fact that the information
entered into the data processing system that day has been reviewed by him or her.
’ Jicense,
requests the Board of Phartnacy enter an order
“WHEREFORE, F Petitioner - respectfully
more of the following penalties: revocation or suspension of Respondent’s
imposing one or
restriction of the Respondent's practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of
and/or any other relief that the Board
a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation ,
deems appropriate.
SIGNED nig DX ey a Basen, 08
Robert G. Brooks, M.D.
Secretary, Departmeyt of Health
y: Nancy M. Snurkowski
Chief Attomey
On Behalf of the Agency for
Health Care Administration
COUNSEL FOR AGENCY:
egory Files
enior Attomey
_ _ Agency for Health Care Administration
General Counsel’s Office - MQA
Allied Health FI ILE )
~ P.O. Box 14229
Tallahassee, FL 32317 - 4229 DEPARTMENT Of EALTH
(850) 487-2225 . EFUTY wg Dim
CLERK
; GWFleag” — ee
PCP: a a pate Ot)
DATE:
7
‘
E
Docket for Case No: 00-000687
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 16, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED per parties` failure to respond to September 13, 2000 Order.
|
Sep. 13, 2000 |
Order Continuing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by October 20, 2000).
|
Aug. 14, 2000 |
Motion to Abate (Petitioner) filed.
|
Jul. 07, 2000 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance sent out. (parties to advise status by 9/7/00)
|
Jun. 30, 2000 |
Motion to Abate (Department) filed.
|
Mar. 31, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for July 11, 2000; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL)
|
Mar. 03, 2000 |
Response to Initial Order (Petitioner) filed.
|
Feb. 11, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Feb. 09, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 09, 2000 |
Agency Referral Letter filed.
|