Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENISTRY
Respondent: MARK BEHAR
Judges: SUSAN BELYEU KIRKLAND
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Feb. 11, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, December 6, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
Petitioner, O6 - 7? Vit
Vs. . CASE NO. 99-55130
MARK BEHAR,
Respondent.
/
eee
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES Now, the Petitioner, Department of Health,
pereinafter: referred to as “petitioner”, and files this
Administrative Complaint pefore the Board of Dentistry
against MARK BEHAR, hereinafter referred to as
"Respondent”, and alleges:
1. petitioner is the state agency charged with
regulating the practice of dentistry pursuant to Section
“90.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter 455, Florida Statutes; and
Chapter 466, ‘Florida statutes.
2. Pursuant to the authority of Section 20.43(3) (9g)
Flori “Statutes, the Petitioner has contracted with the
Agency for Héalth. Care Administration, hereinafter referred
to as the "agency," to provide consumer complaint,
investigative, and prosecutorial services required by the
: 5 fy
pivision of Medical Quality Assurance, councils or board,
as appropriate, including the issuance of emergency orders
of suspension or restriction.
3. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, 4 licensed dentist in the State of Florida, having
peen issued license number DN 0008030. Respondent’ s last
known address is 950 North Federal Highway, Suite 202,
Pompano Beach, Florida 33062.
4. In or around October 1998 Patient K.P. presented
to the Respondent for dental treatment.
5. During treatment, Patient K.P. observed that
neither the Respondent nor the Respondent’ s dental
auxiliary were wearing surgical gloves during intra-oral
' procedures.
6. In xesponse to the complaint, the Respondent
wrote to the Petitioner and stated that:
When I took the final impression my gloves were
removed..[N]o, Wwe only “always’s” wear gloves when
Ciaaone there is blood present. For those outside the
- mouth procedures, with the fast spinning burs
close to the fingers we don’t. We also don’t
wear them for final impressioning pecause of the
‘contamination of the material. If we are only
“inspecting the mouth with our sterilized
instruments and not going to touch any mouth
tissues, Wwe won’t wear gloves either...
ee, Yd @
7. Rule 64B5-25.003(8), Florida hdministrative Code,
states that:
“{s]urgical or examination gloves and surgical
masks shall be worn by all dentist, dental
hygienists, and dental assistants while
performing or assisting in the performance of any
intra-oral dental procedure on a patient in which
contact with blood and/or saliva is imminent.
Surgical ofr examination gloves must be changed
between patients. Hands shall be washed with
soap and water and dried immediately after
removing and prior to replacing gloves. Gloves
are never to be washed and reused. Surgical or
examination gloves that are punctured or torn
must be removed and replaced immediately with new
gloves following rewashing of provider's hands
with soap and water...
COUNT I
8. Petitioner realleges the factual allegations
contained in the preceding paragraphs as if fully stated
herein.
9. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent’ s license
to practice dentistry in the State of Florida is subject to
_ discipline for violating Section 466.028 (1) (u), Florida
Statutes, for failing to provide and maintain~ reasonable
sanitary facilities and conditions.
COUNT II
16. Petitioner “realleges. the factual allegations
_ contained in paragraphs one (1) through seven (7) as if
fully stated herein.
a, @ | @
WO oo!
4. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent’ s license
to practice dentistry in the State of Florida is subject to
discipline for . violating Section 466.028 (1) (xX), Florida
Statutes, for being guilty of incompetence ox negligence by
failing to meet the minimum standards of performance in
diagnosis and treatment when measured against generally
prevailing peer performance, including, but not limited to,
the undertaking of diagnosis and treatment for which the
dentist is not qualified by training or experience or being
“guilty of dental malpractice.
_ , ww)
_ WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board
of Dentistry enter an order imposing one or more of the
following penalties: revocation or suspension of _ the
~""Respondent’s license, restriction of thé Respondent's
practice, imposition of an administrative fine, issuance of
a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on. probation,
and/or any other relief that the Board deems appropriate.
SIGNED thigAGbaay ot ) WO. , 1999.
Robert G. Brooks, M.D.
Secretary, Department of Health
ee By: Nancy M. Sn owski
Chief Attorney
apres a . . . co kns
- SO ONSEL FOR AGENCY: . FILED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
“Trisha T. Webb DEPUTY CLERK
Senior Attorney CLERK Uehi R-Ealion
. Agency for Health Care Administration
, General Counsel's Office - MQA DATE. 22/82/79
Allied Health
P.O. Box 14229 : :
“Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229
“(850) 410-3465
Greera Robinsons Fisher
99. [a0 199.
Docket for Case No: 00-000715
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 31, 2001 |
Notice of Compliance filed by R. Paradela.
|
Jan. 09, 2001 |
Final Order filed.
|
Dec. 06, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Dec. 01, 2000 |
Status Report (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Nov. 08, 2000 |
Order Continuing Case in Abeyance issued (parties to advise status by December 1, 2000).
|
Nov. 01, 2000 |
Status Report (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 27, 2000 |
Order Continuing Case in Abeyance issued. (parties to advise status by November 1, 2000)
|
Jul. 25, 2000 |
Joint Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance. (filed by Petitioner via facsimile)
|
Jul. 07, 2000 |
Order Continuing Case in Abeyance sent out. (parties to advise status by September 7, 2000.)
|
Jul. 06, 2000 |
Status Report (filed by Petitioner via facsimile)
|
Jun. 12, 2000 |
Order Granting Continuance and Placing Case in Abeyance sent out. (Parties to advise status by July 7, 2000.)
|
Jun. 06, 2000 |
Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance (Petitioner filed via facsimile) filed.
|
May 18, 2000 |
(Petitioner) Notice of Serving of Petitioner`s Request to Produce, Expert Interrogatories, and Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile). |
May 18, 2000 |
(Respondent) Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum filed. |
Mar. 10, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions sent out.
|
Mar. 10, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for June 20 and 21, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL)
|
Feb. 28, 2000 |
(Petitioner) Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 28, 2000 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 17, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Feb. 11, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Feb. 11, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Feb. 11, 2000 |
Agency Referral Letter filed.
|