Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE
Respondent: MEREDITH L. SCOTT, M.D.
Judges: MARY CLARK
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Mar. 08, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, October 18, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2024
Be AMR ate nn
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, )
: ) -
PETITIONER, +) oo-/ Od /
) o
v. ) CASE NO. 1997-19558
)
MEREDITH L. SCOTT, MD., )
)
RESPONDENT. _)
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Petitioner, Department of Health, hereinafter referred to as
“Petitioner,” and files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Medicine against
Meredith L. Scott, M.D., hereinafter referred to as “Respondent,” and alleges:
1. Effective July 1, 1997, ‘Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the
practice of medicine pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter 455, Florida Statutes, -
and Chapter 458, Florida Statutes. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 20.43(3), Florida
Statutes, the Petitioner! has ‘contracted with the Agency fo for Health Care Administration to provide
ed by the Division of |
Medical Quality Assurance, councils, or boards, as appropriate.
2. Respondent is and has been at all times material hereto a licensed physician in the
State of Florida, having been issued Ticense number ME 0013426. Respondent’s last known ~
address is 217 Hillcrest Street, Orlando, F Florida 39801.
3. ° Respondent is board certified in Surgery and Thoracic Surgery.
4
i
4
Ren lnm Ai il edna
Wh Ml a Hl ea wa
ut
4. In or about November 14, 1996, Patient L.B., a 75 year old male with a history of
heart disease and previous coronary artery. bypass: surgery, was admitted to Florida Hospital
. Medical Center for further treatment of a recent myocardial infarction (heart attack).
5. “Patient LB. was evaluated and diagnosed with acute congestive heart failure with
stenosis (narrowing) of the aorta, the largest vessel leaving the heart. Patient L.B. was then
advised to undergo coronary artery bypass procedure and surgical replacement of his aortic
valve, to be performed by Respondent. -
6. - On or about November 22, 1996, Respondent and his assistant performed the
above procedures on Patient L.B., placing his cardiopulmonary system on a bypass machine to
facilitate surgery. When the primary surgical procedures were completed, Respondent weaned
Patient L.B.’s cardiopulmonary system from the bypass machine and began to close Patient
L.B.’s open chest, at which time a nurse informed Respondent that the sponge count was
_ incorrect.
7. During his surgery, Respondent placed a sponge in the left ventricle of Patient
L.B.’s heart, v wh Jodged when Patient L°B. was v ed from bypass and his heart
_ began to again pump blood. X-rays were performed which revealed the sponge to have lodged
placed Patient L. Be onto to cardiopulmonary bypass for: an n additional 9 93. minutes as they performed
a laparotomy (incision ‘and exploration of the abdominal cavity), located the Sponge, and
clamped and opened the abdominal aorta to extract it.
_ 9. _ Patient L.B.’s surgical wounds were then closed, and he was sent to the hospital’s
Cardiac Care Unit in guarded condition. Several hours later, Patient LB. suffered a hemorrhage
2
&?
Ww Nad
and Respondent again performed thoracic surgery in an attempt to locate and stop the bleeding.
During this procedure, Patient L.B.’s cardiac condition deteriorated, and he subsequently arrested
and expired.
10. | Respondent’s failure to recognize the sponge left in Patient L.B.’s heart
necessitated additional surgery and additional bypass time, which placed Patient L.B. at a higher
risk for serious postoperative complications.
ll. 6A reasonably prudent similar physician would not have failed to recognize a
sponge left inside Patient L-B.’s heart.
12. Respondent practiced medicine below the standard of care, in that Respondent
failed to recognize a sponge left in Patient L.B.’s heart during surgery, necessitating additional
surgery and bypass time that placed Patient LB. at higher risk for serious postoperative
" complications.
13. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 458.331(1)(t), Florida
Statutes, by failing to practice medicine with that level of care, skill, and treatment which is
recognized by a reasonably prudent similar physician as being acceptable under similar
conditions and circumstances.
WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Medicine enter an order
imposing one or more of the following penalties: permanent revocation or suspension of the
Respondents loense, restriction of the Respondents s practic, imposition of an administrative
fine, issuance of a reprimand, placement of the Respondent on probation, the assessment of costs
related to the investigation and prosecution of “case, | other than costs associated with an
OPT RR HRN OE RT rere ee
ne)
attomey’s time, as provided for in Section 455.624(3), Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief
that the Board deems appropriate.
_ SIGNED this ZS” day of , 1999.
Robert G. Brooks, M.D., Secretary
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Kathryn L. Kasprzak | Fi
Chief Medical Attorney DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Agency for Health Care Administration
CLERK
P.0.Box 14229 Senn vis ee
Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229
Florida Bar # 937819 ~ pate_\-25-99
RPC/hrb Cav 1 aS 00 DC, pid
PCP: Ji anuary 22, 2000 Ook
PCP Members: Ashkar, Glotfelty, Rodriguez
es ee enpeememmre pup ce we
PATIENT INDEX >
Meredith L. Scott, M.D. Case No. 1997-19558
Patient L.B. Leroy Benedict
Please refer to all patients by initials. Patient names and records are confidential.
cece ee eee
ocean meee
[oor perme
SA TTR Pe oo
72000 WED 09:53 AM GURNEY & HANDLEY, P.A, FAK NO, 407 49 4941 P, 02/03
“fe i ‘ . . : : \
. or
ve THOMAS GURNEY nigol-roo27 4 ‘ Yy @ Handlyy, Ee ; ‘ TWO LANDMARK CENTER
ON H. HANDLEY*
mene Le poieeinl ATTORNEYS AND CouNSeLors aT Law 22S EAST ROBINSON SYREET
ROGERT S. GREEN . . SUITE <50
WwW. MARVIN HARDY, mt* BO. BOX 1273
RONALD L, HARROP
FRANCIS €, PIERCE, DZ ORLANDO, FLORIDA 22808-1273
PETER N. SMITH TEL, 407/843-9500
RICHARD E, DUNEGAN FACSIMILE 407 /6a3.a94]
DAVID AB. FALSYAD
STEVEN H. PRESTON? March 1, 2000 E-MAIL gurney-handley@worldnetettnet
?
PAUL D. RANG, D.M.D. :
Seaamioed “ALSO MEMBER OF GA BAR
OF COUNSEL - "ALSO MGMDER OF CT BAR
RICHARD W. LASSITER ‘CRATIFIED CIRCUIT COURT MEDIATOR
DAVID W. ROQUEMCRE, JR.
: LEY H. SMITH . : : : OUR REFCRENCE
: .
, ; Oe ee a 97-461
VIA FACSIMILE AND CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Kathryn L. Kasprzak, Chief Medical Attorney _——- / Jd
Agency for Health Care Administration 0 O
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32308 . .
RE: AHCA v. Scott
Case No,: 97-19558
Dear Ms. Kasprzak:
:. Enclosed please find the Election of Rights executed by Dr. Scott requesting Option 3 and
a formal hearing pursuant to Section 120,569(2)(a), Fla. Stat,
Tn follow-up to my correspondence of February 15,2000, Dr. Scott requests and will sti pulate
to extending the 15 day notification requircment of Section 120,569(2)(a), Fla. Stat., in order to
complete the deposition of Petitioner’s medical expert(s), and in particular Fred H. Edwards, M.D.
; __. Please contact me at your earliest convenience so we may discuss this matter further. I look
forward to hearing from you soon,
~ Sincerely,
fm |
FRANCIS E. PIERCE, IT]
Docket for Case No: 00-001031
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Dec. 31, 2002 |
Notice of Dismissal/Closing Order on Reconsideration filed.
|
Oct. 18, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 16, 2000 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 11, 2000 |
Order issued. (respondent`s third notice of trial conflict and motion for continuance is denied)
|
Sep. 07, 2000 |
Notice of Trial Conflict and Motion for Continuance filed by Respondent.
|
Aug. 21, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Supplemental Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 14, 2000 |
Petitioner`s First Request for Interrogatories and Production of Documents (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 11, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Response to respondent`s First Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 10, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Supplemental Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 02, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Supplemental Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce. (filed via facsimile) |
Jul. 24, 2000 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing set for November 14 and 15, 2000; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL)
|
Jul. 20, 2000 |
Notice of Trial Conflict and Motion for Continuance (Respondent) filed.
|
Jul. 10, 2000 |
Ltr. to F. Pierce from L. McDonald In re: Letter of confirmation (filed via facsimile)
|
Jun. 30, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce (filed via facsimile) |
Jun. 16, 2000 |
(Respondent) Request to Produce filed. |
Jun. 15, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Respondent`s Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile).
|
Jun. 06, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Supplemental Response to Respondent`s Request for Production (filed via facsimile). |
May 23, 2000 |
Notice of Serving Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce filed. |
May 23, 2000 |
Petitioner` Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce (filed via facsimile). |
May 22, 2000 |
(Petitioner) Notice of Serving Petitioner`s Request for Expert Interrogatories (filed via facsimile).
|
May 16, 2000 |
(Respondent) Request for Admissions filed. |
Apr. 24, 2000 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing sent out. (hearing set for October 3 and 4, 2000; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando, FL)
|
Apr. 21, 2000 |
Respondent`s Reply to Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss filed.
|
Apr. 21, 2000 |
Expert Interrogatories filed. |
Apr. 21, 2000 |
Notice of Service of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed. |
Apr. 21, 2000 |
Respondent`s Motion for in Camera Inspection filed.
|
Apr. 21, 2000 |
(Respondent) Request to Produce filed. |
Apr. 20, 2000 |
Order sent out. (respondent`s motion to dismiss is denied)
|
Apr. 20, 2000 |
(Respondent) Notice of Trial Conflict and Motion for Continuance filed.
|
Apr. 18, 2000 |
Respondent`s Reply to Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 18, 2000 |
Respondent`s Motion for in Camera Inspection (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 17, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Response to Respondent`s Motion to Dismiss (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 10, 2000 |
(Respondent) Motion to Dismiss filed.
|
Mar. 27, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions sent out.
|
Mar. 27, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for June 22 and 23, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Orlando, FL)
|
Mar. 22, 2000 |
Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Mar. 15, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Notice of Scrivener`s Error filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Memorandum of Finding of Probable Cause filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Notice of Appearance filed by L. McDonald.
|
Mar. 08, 2000 |
Agency Referral Letter filed.
|
Mar. 06, 2000 |
Notice of Appearance (filed via facsimile).
|
Mar. 06, 2000 |
Agency Referral Letter (filed via facsimile).
|
|
Petitioner`s Supplemental Response to Respondent`s Request to Produce (filed via facsimile). |
|
(Respondent) Request to Produce filed. |