Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE vs WALTER H. DORNBUSCH, D.V.M., 00-002357 (2000)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 00-002357 Visitors: 9
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
Respondent: WALTER H. DORNBUSCH, D.V.M.
Judges: DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Viera, Florida
Filed: Jun. 06, 2000
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, December 19, 2000.

Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2004
Summary: Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license as a veterinarian based on alleged violations of Section 474.214, Florida Statutes (1997), as charged in the Administrative Complaints filed against Respondent in this proceeding. Count I of the Administrative Complaint in Case No. 00-2357 charged Respondent with a violation of Section 474.214(1)(r), Florida Statutes (1997): being guilty of incompetence or negligence by failing to practice medicine with that level of care,
More
12-19-00 Final Order No. BPR-2003-01182 Date: 3.0} STATE OF FLORIDA FILED BOARD OF VETERINARY ME_ Department of Business and Professional Regulation AGENCY CLERK DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND Sarah Wachman, Agency Clerk PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Whe ‘ L wm ; . Me By: Petitioner, vs. DBPR CASE NOS.: 98-11323 Y — 98-21230 Ge. WALTER H. DORNBUSCH, D.V.M., DOAH CASE NOS.: 00-2357 Sc 00-2358 BE ne Respondent. ; F pO, GY, / DMK -CWS Wp. %, WSs FINAL ORDER Oe. THIS MATTER came before the Board of Veterinary Medicine (hereinafter referred to as the “Board”) pursuant to Section 120.57(1)(j), Florida Statutes, on March 6, 2001, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for consideration of the Recommended Order (a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) issued by Administrative Law Judge Daniel M. Kilbride in the above styled case. The Petitioner was represented by Joseph W. Malka, Assistant General Counsel. Respondent was present and represented by Allen Grossman, Esq. Upon consideration of the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Crder, the arguments of the parties, and after a review of the complete record in this matter, the Foard makes the following rulings and findings: Respondent filed a Motion to Reject Recommended Order or to Decrease Penalty. This Motion was filed on or about February 23, 2001. The Recommended Order was filed on December 19, 2000. The Board considers that said Motion is an untimely attempt to argue matters which could have been raised as exceptions to the Recommended Order. After hearing argument of counsel regarding the Motion, the Board DENIED the Motion. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact are hereby approved and adopted and incorporated herein by reference. 2. There is competent, substantial evidence to support the Administrative Law Judge’s Findings of Fact. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 4. The Board has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to the provisions of Section 120.57(1), and Chapter 474, Florida Statutes. 2. The Administrative Law Judge’s Conclusions of Law, are hereby approved and adopted in toto and incorporated herein by reference. 3. There is competent substantial evidence to support the Board's findings and conclusions. 4. The Board concurs with the Administrative Law Judge’s recommendation. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: That Respondent is hereby SUSPENDED from the practice of veterinary medicine for 30 days. Respondent shall pay a FINE of $4,000 and investigative costs of $1,557.53 no later than 30 days from the effective date of this Order. Respondent shall be on PROBATION for five (5) years. During the term of probation, Respondent shall practice under the indirect supervision of a monitor approved by the Board. The monitor shall be a Florida licensed veterinarian. During the first two years of probation, the monitor shall go to Respondent's place of practice on a quarterly basis and review 12 randomly selected patient records to determine Respondent's quality of practice and recordkeeping. The monitor shall file quarterly reports with the Board office detailing his findings. During the last three years of probation the monitor shall provide the same review and reporting on a semi-annual basis. Respondent shall bear the cost of monitoring as well as the responsibility to ensure that the monitor's reports are timely filled. Respondent shall submit one or more names of suitable monitors to the Board office no later than 30 days after receipt of this Order. The Board delegates to the chair the ability to approve the monitor. Respondent shall complete 10 hours of continuing education in anesthesia and shall submit proof of completion of said hours to the Board office, no later than one (1) year from the effective date of this Order. Said continuing education hours shall be in addition to, and not count toward, Respondent's required continuing education hours for renewal of licensure. Pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, the Parties are hereby notified that they may appeal this Order by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Northwood Centre, 1940 N. Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792, and by filing the filing fee and one copy of the Notice of Appeal with the District Court of Appeal within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Order. This Order shall become effective upon filing with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. DONE AND ORDERED this day of , 2001. We DR. ROBERT O’NEIL, CHAIRMAN Board of Veterinary Medicine CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Final Order has been provided by U.S. Mail to Walter Dornbusch, DVM, 1117 Malabar Road, Northeast, Palm Bay, FL 32907: to Allen Grossman, Esq., Gray Harris & Robinson, P.O. Box 11189, Tallahassee, FL 32302-3189, and by hand delivery/United States Mail to the Board Clerk, Department of Business and Professional Regulation and its Counsel, Northwood Centre, 1940 North Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792, on or before 5:00 p.m., this. sda of , 2001.

Docket for Case No: 00-002357
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 15, 2004 Final Order filed.
Dec. 19, 2000 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Dec. 19, 2000 Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 25, 2000) CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 20, 2000 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Oct. 27, 2000 Transcript (Volume 1 through 3) filed.
Oct. 19, 2000 Letter to Judge Kilbride from W. Bornbusch filed.
Oct. 19, 2000 (Respondent) Case Summary (Untitled) filed.
Sep. 28, 2000 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Sep. 28, 2000 Proposed Exhibit (filed by P. Dornbusch via facsimile).
Sep. 27, 2000 Proposed Exhibits (filed by P. Dornbusch via facsimile).
Sep. 25, 2000 CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to September 28, 2000 at 9:00 A.M. 09/28/2000
Sep. 15, 2000 Amended Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for September 25, 2000; 10:00 a.m.; Viera, FL, amended as to date).
Sep. 14, 2000 Order of Consolidation and Granting Brief Continuance issued. (consolidated cases are: 00-002357, 00-002358)
Sep. 08, 2000 Petitioner`s Motion for Continuance of Formal Hearing (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 31, 2000 Petitioner`s Notice of Service of First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Jul. 28, 2000 Subpoena ad Testificandum filed.
Jul. 11, 2000 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions sent out.
Jul. 11, 2000 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for September 18, 2000; 1:00 p.m.; Viera, FL)
Jun. 27, 2000 Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile) filed.
Jun. 12, 2000 Initial Order issued.
Jun. 06, 2000 Election of Rights filed.
Jun. 06, 2000 Administrative Complaint filed.
Jun. 06, 2000 Agency Referral Letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 00-002357
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 15, 2004 Agency Final Order
Dec. 19, 2000 Recommended Order Respondent deviated from the standard of care in two cases by failure to offer a pre-anesthesia lab work-up; use of improper anesthesia protocol; and inadequate discharge instructions; suspension, fine, and probation.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer