Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: FRANK PENNEA
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Jul. 01, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, October 17, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
yy
(Oey,
ison, *s
“A578 Qo “e
STATE OF FLORIDA Mei,
FE
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I
DIEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
Case No. 99-02477
vs.
FRANK PENNEA,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
FREGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against FRANK
PENNEA, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified General Contractor, in the State of Florida,
WU Nw,
having been issued license number CG C016823.
3. Respondent's last known address is 1300 N. FL. Mango
Road, Suite 19, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409.
4, At all times material hereto, Respondent was the
licensed qualifier for DST Empresas, Inc. (hereinafter referred
to as Contractor) and was responsible in such capacity for all of
its contracting activities.
5. At no time material hereto did the Contractor possess a
Qualifying Business license.
COUNT I
6. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five as though fully set
forth in this Count I.
7. On or about December 2, 1998, the Contractor contracted
with Irving and Sharon Bretl (hereinafter referred to as
“Customers”) to reroof a residence at 745 Foresteria Avenue, West
Palm Beach, Florida, for Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000.00).
8. The Customers paid the Contractor a Ten Thousand dollar
($10,000.00) deposit toward the aforesaid contract.
9. Section 489.113(3), Florida Statutes provides: “A
i
contractor shall subcontract all electrical, mechanical,
plumbing, roofing, sheet metal, swimming pool, and air-
conditioning work, unless such contractor holds a state
certificate or registration in the respective trade category...”
U a,
10. Further, Section 489.113(3)(g), Florida Statutes
provides: “No general, building, or residential. contractor
certified after 1973 shall act as, hold himself or herself out to
be, or advertise himself or herself to be a roofing contractor
unless he or she is certified or registered as a roofing
contractor.”
11. By contracting to perform roof work, the Contractor
violated the foregoing sections of Chapter 489, Florida Statutes,
12. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1998 SUPP.), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT _II
13. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five and seven through eleven
as though fully set forth in this Count II.
14, Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes, provides: “If the
applicant proposes to engage in business as a business
organization, including any partnership, corporation, business
trust, or other legal entity, or in any name other than the
applicant's legal name or a fictitious name where the applicant
is doing business as a sole proprietorship, the business
organization must apply for a certificate of authority through a
cualifying agent and under a fictitious name, if any.
U YU
15. By failing to obtain a qualifying business license, the
Contractor violated the foregoing provision of Chapter 489,
Florida Statutes.
16. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1998 SUPP.), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT III
17. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through eleven
and fifteen as though fully set forth in this Count III.
18. The Contractor was unable to perform and/or complete
the work provided for under the contract with the Customers.
19. The Customers subsequently hired Frampton Roofing,
Inc., to perform the roof work.
20. The Customers paid Frampton Roofing, Inc. Sixteen
Thousand, Seven Hundred Fifty dollars ($16,750.00) to complete
the roof.
21. The Customers paid an additional Nine Hundred Ninety
Eight dollars and Forty Five cents ($998.45) to a material
suppler of the Contractor’ s.
22. The Customers spent Two Thousand, Seven Hundred Forty
Eight dollars and Forty Five cents ($2,748.45) more than the
contracted price.
' UY
23. The foregoing constitutes financial mismanagement or
misconduct in the practice of contracting.
24. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
439.129(1) (h) (3), Florida Statutes (1996 SUPP.), by committing
mismanagement or misconduct in the practice of contracting that
causes financial harm to a customer. Financial mismanagement or
misconduct occurs when the contractor's job has been completed, and
it is shown that the customer has had to pay more for the
contracted job than the original contract. price, as adjusted for
subsequent change orders, unless such increase in cost was the
result of circumstances beyond the control of the contractor, was
the result of circumstances caused by the customer, or was
otherwise permitted by the terms of the contract between the
contractor and the customer.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one
or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution,
impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is
WU
U
authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida
Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this v
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Diane Snell Perera
Senior Attorney
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
401 NW 2 Avenue #N607
Miami, FL. 33128
(305) 377-7115
99-02477 i
6/18/99
DSP/ms
Tea. 1/28/99
Ne KA Grice fe om MMmoOnI
day of.
Awyoot , 1999.
G.W. HARRELL,
CHIEF: ATTORNEY
Lahhye # D Yona
F I
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
DEPU
TY CLERK
cunt Dyer
DATE =
Docket for Case No: 00-002673PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 17, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 16, 2000 |
Motion to Cancel Hearing and Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 27, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Jul. 27, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for October 24, 2000; 1:00 p.m.; West Palm Beach, FL)
|
Jul. 17, 2000 |
Notice of Change of Address filed by M. Noto.
|
Jul. 17, 2000 |
Joint Response to Initial Order. (filed via facsimile)
|
Jul. 13, 2000 |
Notice of Change of Address. (filed by Klein and Noto via facsimile)
|
Jul. 06, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Respondent`s Answer to Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|