Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: FREDERICK L. INGLE
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Jul. 03, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Tuesday, October 24, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
ed Ned on &
. »
STATE OF FLORIDA Lb,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION/7, %,
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD — 4iKV/gily, |?
< Ly $9
DIVISION II Vig
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, . C0-Z120FR
Petitioner,
Case No. 9398-21008
vs.
FREDERICK L. INGLE,
Respondent.
,
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against
FREDERICK L. INGLE, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified air Conditioning Contractor, in the State of
Florida, having been issued license number CA C014666.
3. Respondent's last known addresses are 2401 NW i108"
Drive, Coral Springs, FL 33065-3636 and 830 NW 57‘* Place, Ft.
Lauderdale, FL 33309. .
4. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the
\w
icensed qualifier for Metro Air Conditioning, Inc. (hereinafter
/ referred to as "Metro™) and was responsible in such capacity for
7 all of its contracting activities.
5. On or about May 27, 1998, Metro salesman Joe Senesac
went to the home of Frank Burak, at 4141 NW 48> Avenue, Ft.
Lauderdale, Florida 33319, and obtained Burak’s signature on a
credit application and a blank Metro proposal by:
a. Falsely representing to Burak that he and/or his
company Environmental Services Group, Inc. and/or Metro were
affiliated with FPL; and
b. Offering to replace Burak’s air conditioner with a new
more efficient air conditioner and by falsely representing to
Burak that Burak would pay for the new air conditioner over time
with payments to FPL. .
6. The Respondent’s license number did not appear in the
proposal, in violation of Section 489.119(6) (b), Florida Statutes
(1997). |
7. The proposal did not contain a written statement
explaining consumer’s rights under the Construction Industries
Recovery Fund in violation of Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes
(1997). f
8. Thereafter, Metro replaced Burak’s air conditioner,
without obtaining a building permit, and Metro obtained
compensation for the work from a financing company by filling in
the blank proposal with a price that Burak never agreed to,
2
990.00, and then submitting the proposal and the credit
z .
“application to the financing company. Approximately one month
i later, Burak received a bill from a financing company, HRS, for
é
,
$5,990.00.
9. At all times material hereto, Metro failed to obtain a
certificate of authority as a business organization in violation
of Section 489.119(2), Florida Statutes (1997). .
COUNT I
10. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through nine as though fully set
forth in this Count I. .
11. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
having violated Section 455.227(1) (m), Florida Statutes (1997) by
making deceptive, untrue, or fraudulent representations in or
related to the practice of contracting or employing a trick or
scheme in or related to the practice of contracting, and is
thereby guilty of having violated Section 489.129(1) (c), Florida
Statutes (1997), by violating any provision of Chapter 455,
Florida Statutes.
COUNT ITI
12. Petitioner tealleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through nine as though fully set
“forth in this Count 11. te
13. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of.
ving failed to include his license number in a contract in
/Miolation of Section 489.119(6) (b), Florida Statutes (1997), and
is thereby guilty of having violated Section 489.129(1) (5),
Florida Statutes (1997), by failing in any material respect to
comply with the provisions of this part or violating a rule or
lawful order of the board.
.COUNT III
14. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in Paragraphs one through nine as though fully set
forth in this Count III.
15. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
having failed to include in a contract a written statement
explaining consumers’ rights under the Construction Industries
Recovery Fund in violation of Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes
(1997), and is thereby guilty of having violated Section
489.129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1997), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT IV
16. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs fone through nine as though fully set
forth in this Count tv.
17. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
having failed to obtain a certificate of authority for Metro in
since al
AAR =
Se
wiolation of Section 489,119(2), Florida Statutes (1997), and is
“teem.
thereby guilty of having violated Section 489.129(1) (j), Florida
Statutes (1997), by failing in any material respect to comply
with the provisions of this part or violating a rule or lawful
order of the board.
COUNT V
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through nine as though fully set
forth in this Count V.
19. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
having violated Section 489.129(1) (n), Florida Statutes (1997),
by committing incompetency or misconduct in the. practice of
contracting.
COUNT VI
20. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
‘set forth in paragraphs one through nine as though fully set
forth in this Count VI.
21. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
having violated Section 489.129(1)(p), Florida Statutes (1997),
by proceeding on BY job without obtaining applicable local
building department ‘permits and inspections.
. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respect fully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one
or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
// reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
“exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution,
impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is
authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida
Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this ™ day of _ Aujost , 1999.
Cahn. Xk Dana
G.W. HARRELL
CHIEF ATTORNEY
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: F |
j tion
Theodore R. Gay Department of Business and Professional Regulat
Senior Attorney DEPUTY
Department of Business and .
Professional Regulation Pyprdin ichole
401 NW 2 Avenue #N607 CLERK ae
Miami, FL 33128 Z-\6 -
(305) 377-7115 DATE __&*
gee Je f
TRG/sb
6/30/99
Case #98-21008
PUR. 72s] 14
Cosary 46 Jarson
Docket for Case No: 00-002720PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 24, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 20, 2000 |
(Petitioner) Motion to Continue and to Hold in Abeyance (filed via facsimile).
|
Aug. 23, 2000 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for October 25 and 26, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Aug. 21, 2000 |
Motion for Continuance of Trial (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Aug. 03, 2000 |
Amended Notice of Video Teleconference issued. (hearing scheduled for August 29 and 30, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale and Tallahassee, FL, amended as to date and video)
|
Aug. 02, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Aug. 02, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued. (hearing set for August 30, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL)
|
Jul. 28, 2000 |
Order issued. (consolidated cases are: 00-002720, 00-002721, 00-002722)
|
Jul. 24, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Consolidate (00-2721, 00-2722). (filed via facsimile)
|
Jul. 21, 2000 |
Response to Initial Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile)
|
Jul. 19, 2000 |
Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile)
|
Jul. 11, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 03, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|