"DEPARTNEN Cc NSTRUCTION | INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD - PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, . ; Petitioner, ovs. ve “CARLOS DIAZ, — Respondent ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT _eetstionsr, DEPARTMENT oF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL ry files ‘this Adninistrative complaint _ REGULAY ‘TON, ("Pe ition — “before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against c ‘the practice of ‘contracting Sueeuabe to section 20. 165, “Florida. Statutes, and Chapters | 455 and 48%, Florida statutes. PERT Sol BURA eta aa ane “responsible for the acts, omissions, and financial conduct of the os business as it relat es to racting. 5. on or ‘about ‘November 3, 1997, contractor contracted Oe with ‘ERVIN and MARIE ALLEN (hereinafter ALLEN) ‘to furnish and a a ‘new master bedroom and bathroom and a screened enclosure cat ALLEN’ s residence, 18730 hw ase Avenue, North Miami, Florida. 6 ‘The contract price was $20, 498. 00. The aforesaid proje obtained and inspections “be. performed. No ‘puilding permit was obtained and no > inspections were performed on. the ‘project. : 4 “Contractor ‘failed to return, to the project to ‘obtain a Lge Be continued for at least 90 eee ye “days. — THORNTON paid 1008 oF the contract price and the work 14.) “Florida | ‘statutes “(1997), provides ctor is gaaiedyc eget “cau e for 90 "consecutive ‘days. cOUNT I 7 ‘Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations hough fully set ‘forth & in this ‘count It. “15. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter : 409. 2292) (2, Florida Statutes 987) by committing “Financial mismanagement or Fs misconduct occurs: ahhen the contractor, has abandoned a customer’ s “job and the ‘percentage of r completion is less. ‘than the “percentage . we of the ‘total contract price paid to the contractor as of the time oF abandonment, unless ‘the ‘contractor is “entitled to retain” ‘such within ‘thirty days efter the job is abandoned. cone Se is. P petitioner vealleges ‘and incorporates the allegations: ; set forth in “paragraphs one ‘through fifteen as “though fully set boo ..forth in this Count III. . “( 17. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter - ee ee under which the business organization is doing - business COUNT W 18. Petitioner rea Lleges and incorporates ‘the allegations set forth in p paragraphs one through twenty ‘as though fully set / forth | in this Count Iv. fees ‘Based on the foregoing, “Respondent violated Chapter 489. 129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1997) by failing in any ‘material “provisions of Part 1 Chapter 489, ct to comply with the Statutes by violating Chapter 489. 1425 (Dy Florida - éxplaining the Constiuction Industry Recovery Fund. _ SOUNE forth in this BGuRE v. oan, “Based on ‘the foregoing, Respondent violated Chapter . | : 489. 129(1) , Florida Statutes (1997) by proceeding on any job -_ : : : : = | consumer, impose an administrati re fine ‘not to exceed ‘$5, 000 0 per “statutes: (1997) in | failing to Ynelude a ‘statement in the contract i assess costs asso erat require continuing education, : chapters 489, A881 oe thereunder. _ signed ‘this 8 day of Z Feb par a : ress i iit a a li ile a : Lahis vy \oud” By: Cathleen 0’ Dowd d Att : Mic ael D. “s Dives “Senior Attorney sion x + Gene immens/ - Department of Business and Pony Cc a ‘Professional Regulation Mi itrick Rhode Bldg., Phase II a sre scrote annanaeecensnntcns A0i NW 2° Street, N607 ‘Miami, Florida 33128-1765 F | [ E D : vps Boe one aN Departinent of Buslness and Professional Regulation - a December 10, 1999 | DEPUTY CLERK Case #99-03581 © 42.000

Docket for Case No: 00-002732PL