Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs FRANK VALENTINO, 00-002736PL (2000)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 00-002736PL Visitors: 7
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: FRANK VALENTINO
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Jul. 03, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, August 16, 2000.

Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2024
Sete calle en lie EE Be aa iti i li ee se i il i, ail i ca il li a i 5 ci iid i i, ct allt ll i ia eh A els he ei I Em “DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ‘PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, “FRANK VALENTINO, — given , and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes. Cy CU STATE OF FLORIDA : DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD : DIVISION T petitioner, ae 00-2736 oe eet “. Case Nos. 99-01176, 98- 22712, 98-22016 vs. "Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT 2. “Respondent ‘is, and has been at all times material j oo am hereto, 3 Certified Residential Contractor, in the State of i ~ Florida, having been issued license number. CR “C002330. . 30 Respondent’ Ss “fast known address is 3221 SE Court, stuart, Florida 34997 and 1233 45th Street, West Palm beach, Florida 33407. 4 At all times material hereto, Respondent was the licensed quali g Renodeling, Inc., (hereinafter referred ‘to as contractor") and was responsible in . such capacity ‘for all of its “contracting activities. Poona! FACTS PERTAINING TO CASE NUMBER 99-01176 Se Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations “through four as though fully set : 6. . On (or | about February 17, 13997, 8 ‘the Contractor Seuatomen"” ) to "apply a ‘coat “of Dur- a- “shield to the roof at 311 Princeton Drive, Lake worth, ‘Florida for one Thousand, Five Hundred dollars (s1, 500. 00) . esate lc il ei an a BS ab i ie il i Mt i A i i A of all labor ‘and "materials does not exceed 33, 500. a 718. ‘the Contractor failed ‘to provide Wilson with written notice explaining ‘consumer . rights “under the “Construction ‘Industry Recovery Fund. 19. The foregoing constitutes a ‘violation of the aforesaid Section of chapter 489, Florida Statutes. 20. Based on, “the foregoing, ‘the Respondent violated Section 489. 129(1) (4), Florida Statutes (1997), by failing in any material . respect to ‘comply with ‘the provisions “of. this part ox violating a “rule or lawful ae a the boa rd. COUNT rrr 21. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one through four, six through thirteen forth in this . o Count III ; = le ‘Contractor contracted ‘Shield to the driveway and sidewalk at with Wilson to apply ‘Dur-3 Tequesta, Florida for ‘One Thousand, Six ($1, 680.00). Hundred Bight dollars warranties. Eighty dollars 185, 180. 60) “in furtherance of both contracts. 25. In or ‘around August 1997, Rilson notified the Customer s rook. oat ‘The Contractor ‘failed to perform corrective work on the Customer’ Ss “roof. 28. applying an inferior product to the Customer’ s roof and driveway, ‘and failing | to perform corrective work constitutes misconduct 28, Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. -128(2) (n), ‘Florida Statutes (397), by ‘cofmitting “incompetency or misconduct in the practice “of contracting. “FACTS PERTAINING TO" CASE. NUMBER 98-22016 with Harry Klause (hereinafter referred to as “Klause”) to apply i Coral Fish Lane, or ‘more ‘Jupiter, Florida for Four Thousand, Four Hundred 32 The Contractor failed to provide Klause with written notice explaining consumer rights under the Construction Industry Recovery Fund. 33. The foregoing constitutes a violation of Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes. 34. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489. 129( (1) (3), Florida ‘Statutes (1997), by failing in any material "respect to - comply with the provisions ‘of this part or violating a er of the ‘poard. "WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests ‘the | “construction Industry Licensing Board enter an order imposing one £ the following penalties: : place on probation, a reprimand the. licensee, ‘revoke, ‘suspend, deny the issuance or ~ rénewal of the certificate or registration, require financial ¢ pters 489, 455, Florida i. Shain a li ac A ill statutes, ‘and/or the rules promlgated the#eun er. COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: “signed ‘this day of (Horsren ton , 1999. _CATHLEEN Be 0’ DOWD, © “LEAD ATTORNEY Dahh» £ di\ona Diane Snell Perera. __Senior Attorney _ Pep: ““Pépartment of Business and PEP. Bey. L%, 1994 “Professional Regulation 401 NW 2 Aventie #N607 DE Ks tees ¥ Gren enon Miami, FL. 33128 (305) 377-7115 99-01176, 98-22712, 98-22016 ; ; F | | E D 9/2279 RAC Department of Business and Professional Regulation DSP /ms a eee DEPUTY CLERK » CLERK Cit dort flichele | DATE MENG 99

Docket for Case No: 00-002736PL
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer