Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: WILLIAM J. CABLE
Judges: MARY CLARK
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jul. 19, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, September 11, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 25, 2024
U wr]
erate ae STH gry
STATE OF FLORIDA ait,
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
UO JUL 19 PH I2: 0%
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
DVisiGH OF
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, : ADMIN is ; RATIVE
HEARINGS
Petitioner,
vs. Case No. 2000-00539
WILLIAM J. CABLE, —
00~-A95 aL
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint against , ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. The Department of Business and Professional Regulation has jurisdiction over the
unlicensed practice of contracting pursuant to Section 455.228, Florida Statutes.
3. At no time material hereto, was Respondent duly registered or certified to engage in
the practice of contracting pursuant to Part I, Chapter 489, Florida Statutes.
4. Respondent's last known address is 14740 Balm Boyette Road, Balm, Florida 33503.
5. Section 489.105(3), Florida Statutes (1997) provides, inter alia, that a “contractor”
is a person who, for compensation, undertakes to, submits a bid to, or does himself or herself or by
others construct, repair, alter, remodel, add to, demolish, subtract from, or improve any building or
structure, including related improvements to real estate, for others or for resale to others and whose
job scope is substantially similar to the job scope described in on of the subsections of Section
1
U , U
489.105(3), Florida Statutes. .
6. Section 489.1105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997) provides, inter alia, that a "roofing
contractor" is a contractor whose services are unlimited in the roofing trade and who has the
experience, knowledge, and skill to install, maintain, repair, alter, extend, or design, when not
prohibited by law, and use materials and items used in the installation, maintenance, extension, and
alteration of all kinds or roofing, waterproofing, and coating, except when coating is not represented
to protect, repair, waterproof, stop leaks, or extend the life of the roof.
7. Section 489.113(2), Florida Statutes, (1997), provides that no person who is not
certified or registered shall practice contracting in this state.
8. Respondent was a part time employee of All Area Roofing, Inc. ("All Area") and was
authorized to contract using their name.
9. At all times material, All Area was qualified by William M. Swatkoski
("Swatkoski"), license number CC C055593.
10. On or about December 20, 1997, Respondent contracted with Robert T. Bliss
("Bliss") to re-roof his residence, using a contract imprinted with All Area's name and license
number. |
11. Respondent represented to Bliss that he was an authorized representative of All Area
and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Area.
12. In approximately January of 1998, Respondent completed the work on the roof.
13. ‘Respondent accepted three thousand seven hundred dollars ($3,700.00) as payment
in full on the contract.
14, All Area was unaware of Respondent's contract with Bliss, performed no work under
2
U , U
the contract and received no money for the job. :
15. | On or about December 21, 1997, Respondent contracted with James G. Adamson
("Adamson") to re-roof his residence, using a contract imprinted with All Area's name and license
number.
' 16. Respondent represented to Adamson that he was an authorized representative of All
Area and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Area.
17. In approximately January of 1998, Respondent completed the work on the roof.
18. Respondent accepted three two hundred dollars ($3,200.00) as payment in full on the
contract.
19. All Area was unaware of Respondent's contract with Adamson, performed no work
under the contract and received no money for the job.
20. On or about March 28, 1998, Respondent contracted with Jean M. Silk ("Silk") to re-
roof her residence, using a contract imprinted with All Area's name and license number.
21. Respondent represented to Silk that he was an authorized representative of All Area
and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Area.
22. Respondent completed the work on the roof.
23. Respondent accepted three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) as payment in
full on the contract.
24, All Area was unaware of Respondent's contract with Silk, performed no work under:
the contract and received no money for the job.
25. On or about October 22, 1997, Respondent contracted with Linda Ballard ("Ballard")
to re-roof her residence, using a contract imprinted with All Area's name and license number.
3
- Sage
aor
U Nw]
26. Respondent represented to Ballard that he was an authorized representative of All
Area and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Area.
27. In approximately December of 1997, Respondent completed the work on the roof.
28. Respondent accepted three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200.00) as payment in
full on the contract.
29. . All Area was unaware of Respondent's contract with Ballard, performed no work
under the contract and received no money for the job.
30. On or about December 21, 1997, Respondent contracted with Florence F. Seymore
("Seymore") to re-roof her residence, using a contract imprinted with All Area's name and license
number.
31. Respondent represented to Seymore that he was an authorized representative of All
Area and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Area.
32. In approximately January of 1998, Respondent completed the work on the roof.
33. Respondent accepted three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200.00) as payment in
full on the contract.
34. , All Area was unaware of Respondent's contract with Seymore, performed no work
under the contract and received no money for the job.
35. On or about August 29, 1997, Respondent contracted with Kenneth Campbell
("Campbell") to re-roof his residence, using a contract imprinted with the name and license number
of All Action Roofing, Inc. ("All Action").
36. Atall times material, All Action was qualified by Mark S. Dolan ("Dolan"), license
number CC C036978.
U | U
37. Respondent represented to Campbell that he was an authorized representative of All
Action and that there was a five-year warranty on the roof work provided by All Action.
38. In approximately September of 1997, Respondent completed the work on the roof.
39. Respondent accepted three thousand eighty dollars ($3,080.00) as payment in full on
the contract.
40. All Action was unaware of Respondent's contract with Campbell, performed no work
under the contract and received no money for the job.
COUNT I
41. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through fourteen as though fully set forth herein.
42. The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs ten
through fourteen above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant to Section
489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
43. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 489.127(1)(f), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
COUNT II
44. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine and fifteen through nineteen as though fully set forth herein.
45, The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs
5
U | U
fifteen through nineteen above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant to Section
489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
46. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 489.127(1)(f), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
COUNT Il
47. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine and twenty through twenty-four as though fully set forth herein.
48. The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs
twenty through twenty-four above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant to
Section 489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
49. Based on ‘the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 489.127(1)(f}), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
COUNT IV
50. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine and twenty-five through twenty-nine as though fully set forth herein.
51. The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs
6
U . OY
twenty-five through twenty-nine above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant
to Section 489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
52. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Séction 489.127(1)(f), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
COUNT V
53. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine and thirty through thirty-four as though fully set forth herein.
54. The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs thirty
through thirty-four above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant to Section
489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
55. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 489.127(1)(0), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
COUNT VI
56. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through nine and thirty-five through forty as though fully set forth herein.
57. The contracting for and/or the performance of the work described in paragraphs
7
Go U
thirty-five through forty above constitutes engaging in the practice of contracting pursuant to Section
— 489.105(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1997).
58. Based on the foregoing, Respondent has violated Section 489.127(1)(f), Florida
Statutes (1997), which provides that no person shall engage in the business or act in the capacity of
a contractor without being duly registered or certified or advertise himself or a business organization
as available to engage in the business or act in the capacity of a contractor without being duly
registered or certified.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the entry of an Order imposing one or more
of the following penalties: an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000.00 per incident; assessment
of costs related to the investigation and prosecution of the case excluding costs associated with an
attomey’s time; refusal to certify, or to certify with restrictions, an application for licensure;
restriction of practice; issuance of a reprimand; corrective action and/or any other relief the
Department of Business and Professional Regulation is authorized to impose pursuant to Chapter
455 and 489, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder.
“Signed this A? _ day of Apri , 2000.
Department of Business and Professional Regulation Lo Aho LD Nou
DEPUTY CLERK °
Cathleen E. O’Dowd
Brardont Scholl. Lead Construction Attorney
Ome. 4 -2\-2000
WY
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Robert A. Crabill
Assistant General Counsel
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street
Suite 60
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202
RAC/jmh p CP.
Aha (3-00
Case #2000-00539
Docket for Case No: 00-002952PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Sep. 11, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 08, 2000 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction without Prejudice (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Aug. 11, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Aug. 11, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 12, 2000; 9:00 a.m.; Tampa, FL).
|
Aug. 09, 2000 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 26, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Jul. 19, 2000 |
Respondent, William Cable`s Answer to Administrative Compliant filed.
|
Jul. 19, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Jul. 19, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jul. 19, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|