Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF NURSING
Respondent: DIANE KATHERINE TREVENA
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Sep. 26, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, November 27, 2000.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
U Oo U \‘&
yee ae of
STATE OF FLORIDA PILED
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 00 SEP 26 ANIO:43
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF
Petitioner, )
vs. Case No. 1999-05029
DIANE KATHERINE TREVENA, 66-37% L
Respondent. ;
——
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW, Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, by and through
its undersigned counsel and files this administrative complaint before the Board
of Nursing against the Respondent, DIANE KATHERINE TREVENA, and in
support thereof alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice
of nursing pursuant to Chapters 20, 455, and 464, Florida Statutes.
2. Pursuant to the authority of Section 20.43(3)(g), Florida Statutes,
the Petitioner has contracted with the Agency for Health Care Administration to
provide consumer complaint, investigative and prosecutorial services required by
the Division of Medical Quality Assurance, councils or boards, as appropriate,
including the issuance of emergency orders of suspension or restriction.
| 3. Respondent is and has been at all times material hereto, a licensed
ADVANCED REGISTERED NURSE PRACTITIONER in the State of Florida,
having been issued license number RN 2502892.
WU Nw
failing to conform to the minimal acceptable standards of prevailing nursing
practice.
Count Il
12. Petitioner realleges and incorporates by reference the allegations of
fact contained in paragraphs one (1) through eleven (11) as if fully stated herein.
13. Pursuant to Rule 64B9-4.010, Florida Administrative Code,
advanced registered nurse practitioners must practice under a protocol with a
supervising physician or dentist and must maintain a copy of that protocol on file
with the Board of Nursing and at each site where the advanced registered nurse
practitioner practices.
14. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent did not have a
protocol on file with the Board of Nursing. ,
15. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent did not have a
protocol on file with North Broward Medical Center.
16. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent did not have a
protocol on file with Dr. Lehman's office.
17. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent practiced as an
advanced registered nurse practitioner, without a current protocol on file with the
Board of Nursing and/or North Broward Medical Center and/or Dr. Lehman's
18. Respondent is subject to discipline pursuant to section
464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by unprofessional conduct by failing to conform
to the minimal acceptable standards of prevailing nursing practice.
WU UY
4. Respondent's last known address is 1065 NW 50th Drive,
\pano Beach, Florida 33064.
Count |
5. - On or about February 25, 1999, Patient S.W. was hospitalized at
h Broward Medical Center.
6. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent was responsible for
iding nursing care to Patient S.W.
7. On or about February 25, 1999, Respondent increased the amount
edication, specifically Dilaudid and Marcaine, that was being administered to
ant S.W. via CAD pump, to deliver a level/amount greater than that
/amount ordered by the Patient $.W.'s treating physician, Dr. Lehman.
8. Dilaudid and Marcaine are controlled substances under chapter.
Florida Statutes.
9. Respondent did not consult with the Patient S.W’'s treating
ician prior to altering the amount of medication that was administered to
nt S.W.
10. As an advanced registered nurse practitioner, Respondent is not
‘ied by licensure, educational preparation or nursing experience to
iistered controlled substances to patients beyond that amount ordered by
atient’s treating physician.
11.. Based on the foregoing, Respondent is subject to discipline
lant to section 464.018(1)(h), Florida Statutes, by unprofessional conduct by
Docket for Case No: 00-003992PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Nov. 27, 2000 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Nov. 22, 2000 |
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Nov. 13, 2000 |
Subpoena Duces Tecum (filed via facsimile). |
Nov. 13, 2000 |
Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of L. Lehmann (filed via facsimile). |
Nov. 13, 2000 |
(Respondent`s Answers to) Petitioner`s Request for Admissions (filed via facsimile). |
Nov. 09, 2000 |
(Respondent`s Answers to) Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories (filed via facsimile). |
Nov. 09, 2000 |
Respondent`s Notice of Service of Answers to Petitioner`s First Set of Interrogatories (filed via facsimile). |
Oct. 19, 2000 |
Notice of Filing Petitioner`s Request for Interrogatories, Admissions and Production filed. |
Oct. 09, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Oct. 09, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for December 11 and 12, 2000; 10:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Oct. 06, 2000 |
Joint Response to Revised Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Respondent`s Answer and Request for Formal Administrative Hearing filed. |
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Sep. 26, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
|
Initial Order issued. |