Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ANNE BRACHO AND RICHARD MARQUEZ, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF KIANNY MARQUEZ, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 00-004290N (2000)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 00-004290N Visitors: 6
Petitioner: ANNE BRACHO AND RICHARD MARQUEZ, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF KIANNY MARQUEZ, A MINOR
Respondent: FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION
Judges: WILLIAM J. KENDRICK
Agency: Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Oct. 17, 2000
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Wednesday, February 28, 2001.

Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2001
Summary: At issue in this proceeding is whether Kianny Marquez, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.Claimants failed to appear at hearing or otherwise offer proof and failed to carry their burden that claim was compensable. Therefore, claim dismissed.
00-4290.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


ANNE BRACHO and RICHARD MARQUEZ, )

as parents and natural guardians ) of KIANNY MARQUEZ, a minor, )

)

Petitioners, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 00-4290N

) FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL ) INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, )

)

Respondent. )

)


FINAL ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by Administrative Law Judge William J. Kendrick, held a final hearing in the above-styled case on February 23, 2001, by video teleconference, with sites in Tallahassee and Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

APPEARANCES

For Petitioners: No appearance at hearing. For Respondent: W. Douglas Moody, Esquire

Graham, Moody & Sox, P.A.

215 South Monroe Street, Suite 600 Post Office Box 2174

Tallahassee, Florida 32301 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

At issue in this proceeding is whether Kianny Marquez, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be

awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury


Compensation Plan.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On October 17, 2000, Anne Bracho and Richard Marquez, as parents and natural guardians of Kianny Marquez (Kianny), a minor, filed a petition (claim) with the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) for compensation under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan).

DOAH served the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA) with a copy of the claim on October 19, 2000. NICA reviewed the claim, and on November 20, 2000, gave notice that it had "determined that such claim is not a 'birth-related neurological injury' within the meaning of Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes," and requested that "an order [be entered] setting a hearing in this cause on the issue of the compensability of this claim." Such a hearing was duly- noticed and held on February 23, 2001.

Although duly-noticed, neither Petitioners nor anyone on their behalf appeared at hearing, and no evidence was offered to support their claim. Respondent appeared, through counsel, but offered no evidence. The transcript of the hearing was not ordered.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioners nor anyone on their behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support their claim. Respondent, in light of such failure, declined the opportunity to offer any evidence. Consequently, there being no proof, it cannot be factually resolved whether Kianny Marquez, a minor, suffered a "birth-related neurological injury" as alleged in the claim for benefits.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  2. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings. Section 766.301, et seq., Florida Statutes.

  3. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the "Plan") was established by the Legislature "for the purpose of providing compensation, irrespective of fault, for birth-related neurological injury claims" relating to births occurring on or after January 1, 1989. Section 766.303(1), Florida Statutes.

  4. The injured "infant, his personal representative, parents, dependents, and next of kin" may seek compensation under the Plan by filing a claim for compensation with the Division of Administrative Hearings within five years of the infant's birth. Sections 766.302(3), 766.303(2), 766.305(1) and 766.313, Florida

    Statutes. The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which administers the Plan, has "45 days from the date of service of a complete claim . . . in which to file a response to the petition and to submit relevant written information relating to the issue of whether the injury is a birth-related neurological injury." Section 766.305(3), Florida Statutes.

  5. If NICA determines that the injury alleged in a claim is a compensable birth-related neurological injury, it may award compensation to the claimant, provided that the award is approved by the administrative law judge to whom the claim has been assigned. Section 766.305(6), Florida Statutes. If, on the other hand, NICA disputes the claim, as it has in the instant case, the dispute must be resolved by the assigned administrative law judge in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. Sections 766.304, 766.307, 766.309 and 766.31, Florida Statutes.

  6. In discharging this responsibility, the administrative law judge must make the following determination based upon the available evidence:

    1. Whether the injury claimed is a birth- related neurological injury. If the claimant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the administrative law judge, that the infant has sustained a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury and that the infant was thereby

      rendered permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired, a rebuttable presumption shall arise that the injury is a birth-related neurological injury as defined in s. 766.303(2).


    2. Whether obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital; or by a certified nurse midwife in a teaching hospital supervised by a participating physician in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital.


      Section 766.309(1), Florida Statutes. An award may be sustained only if the administrative law judge concludes that the "infant has sustained a birth-related neurological injury and that obstetrical services were delivered by a participating physician at birth." Section 766.31(1), Florida Statutes.

  7. Pertinent to this case, "birth-related neurological injury" is defined by Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, to mean:

    . . . injury to the brain or spinal cord of a live infant weighing at least 2,500 grams at birth caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. This definition shall apply to live births only and shall not include disability or death caused by genetic or congenital abnormality.

  8. As the claimants, the burden rested on Petitioners to demonstrate entitlement to compensation. Section 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. See also Balino v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 348 So. 2d 349, 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) ("[T]he burden of proof, apart from statute, is on the party asserting the affirmative issue before an administrative tribunal.") By failing to appear and offer any proof, Petitioners failed to sustain that burden. Accordingly, the subject claim has not been shown to be compensable under the Plan.

  9. Where, as here, the administrative law judge determines that ". . . the injury alleged is not a birth-related neurological injury . . . he [is required to] enter an order [to such effect] and . . . cause a copy of such order to be sent immediately to the parties by registered or certified mail." Section 766.309(2), Florida Statutes. Such an order constitutes final agency action subject to appellate court review. Section 766.311(1), Florida Statutes.

CONCLUSION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

ORDERED that the petition for compensation filed by Anne Bracho and Richard Marquez, as parents and natural guardians of

Kianny Marquez, a minor, be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2001, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


WILLIAM J. KENDRICK

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of February, 2001.


COPIES FURNISHED:

(By certified mail)


Lynn Larson, Executive Director Florida Birth-Related Neurological

Injury Compensation Association 1435 Piedmont Drive, East, Suite 101

Tallahassee, Florida 32312


Richard Marquez Anne Bracho

5731 Southwest 24th Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33312


W. Douglas Moody, Esquire Graham, Moody & Sox, P.A.

215 South Monroe Street, Suite 600 Post Office Box 2174

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Gene Burkett, M.D.

University of Miami School of Medicine Post Office Box 016960

Miami, Florida 33101


Jackson Memorial Hospital 14701 Northwest 27th Avenue Miami, Florida 33054


Ms. Charlene Willoughby

Agency for Health Care Administration Consumer Services Unit

Post Office Box 14000 Tallahassee, Florida 32308


Daniel Y. Sumner, General Counsel Department of Insurance

The Capitol, Lower Level 26 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0300


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW


A party who is adversely affected by this final order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Sections 120.68 and 766.311, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a Notice of Appeal with the Agency Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. See Section 120.68(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association v. Carreras, 598 So. 2d 299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The Notice of Appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 00-004290N
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 28, 2001 Final Order issued (hearing held February 23, 2001). CASE CLOSED.
Feb. 15, 2001 Notice of Filing, Deposition (of Charles Kalstone, M.D.) filed.
Jan. 11, 2001 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for February 23, 2001, 1:00 p.m., Ft. Lauderdale and Tallahassee, Fl.).
Dec. 18, 2000 Respondent`s Notice of Taking Telephone Deposition filed
Nov. 27, 2000 Order issued (parties shall respond within 14 days from the date of this order).
Nov. 22, 2000 Notice of Noncompensability and Request for Evidentiary Hearing on Compensabiltiy filed.
Nov. 22, 2000 Notice of Assignment of File filed by L. Larson.
Oct. 31, 2000 Order issued. (Respondent`s motion to accept L. Larson as qualified representative is granted).
Oct. 27, 2000 Motion to Act as a Qualified Representative before the Division of Administrative Hearings filed.
Oct. 19, 2000 Letter to L. Larson from Elma Moore enclosing NICA claim for compensation with medical records.
Oct. 18, 2000 Notification that this case is now before the Division of Administrative Hearings sent out.
Oct. 17, 2000 NICA Medical Records filed (not available for viewing).
Oct. 17, 2000 Petition for Benefits Pursuant to Florida Statute Section 766.301 et seq. and filing fee filed.

Orders for Case No: 00-004290N
Issue Date Document Summary
Feb. 28, 2001 DOAH Final Order Claimants failed to appear at hearing or otherwise offer proof and failed to carry their burden that claim was compensable. Therefore, claim dismissed.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer