jew Sb gome P=] eo Po gk bw - STATE OF FLORIDA fe toe _ DEPARTMENT OF HEAUH(C7 9 AM 10: 29 wo ~ Py ne PN . ri J . DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ADMIN STRATIVE = H ARIN Nj Petitioner, Vs. CASENO. 00-02428 GORDON GYOR, R-PH., Respondent. | ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES NOW the Petitioner, Department of Health, and files this Administrative Complaint before the Board of Pharmacy against the Respondent, GORDON GYOR, - R.PH. and in support thereof would state: 1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of Pharmacy pursuant to Section 20.43, Florida Statutes; Chapter 455, Florida Statutes; and Chapter 465, Florida Statutes. 2. Pursuant to the authority of Section 20.43(3)(g), Florida Statutes, the Petitioner has contracted with the Agency for Health Care Administration, hereinafter referred to as the "Agency," to provide consumer complaint, investigative, and prosecutorial services required by the Division of Medical Quality Assurance, councils or board, as appropriate, including the issuance of emergency orders of suspension or restriction. 3. Respondent has been at all times pertinent hereto, a duly licensed pharmacist pursuant to Chapter 465, Florida Statutes, having been issued license number PS 0011402. ao) wy) 4. Respondent's last known address is 6045 Vista Linda Lane, Boca Raton, Florida 33433. 5. On or about March 3, 2000 an investigation was performed by agents of the Petitioner. As a result, it was discovered that on November 6, 1999 the Respondent dispensed Revolution to T.P. for her pet without a prescription. 6. In addition, on March 3, 2000 the investigator requested copies of the daily printout for prescriptions filled and began making telephone calls regarding the verification of prescriptions. Four of the six persons contacted denied ever providing authorization to Pet Med Express, or ever having received the call. Another individual stated the person who supposedly verified the prescription was not working on the day of the verification. 7. On March 8, 2000 printouts of verified prescriptions were obtained and checked by the investigator, there were three instances that there were no calls made to the veterinarians for verification of a prescription. 8. The conduct of the Respondent as aforesaid is contrary to the provisions contained in Section 465.016(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and Rule 465.015(2)(c), Florida Statutes, by dispensing medication without a valid prescription. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Board of Pharmacy to enter an Order imposing one or more of the penalties proscribed by law, together with any other and further relief deemed just under the circumstances. SIGNED thi Zelda of ue 2000. VW Nd Robert G. Brooks, M.D. Secretary, Department of Health By: Nancy M. Snurkowski Chief Attorney On Behalf of the Agency for Health Care Administration COUNSEL FOR AGENCY: Lawrence F. Kranert, Jf. Senior Attorney —_—— Florida Bar No. 0171063 DEPARTMENT OF Agency for Health Care Administration DEPUTY CLERKS Tt General Counsel's Office - MQA CLERK Wf; Practitioner Regulation Wei k P.O. Box 14229 DATE__“7—/7- 2x00 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-4229 (850) 487-2225 LFK/tt pepe: lo {\\ (Co LE / KB

Docket for Case No: 00-004313PL