Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: ROBERT R. NAST
Judges: WILLIAM R. PFEIFFER
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Oct. 25, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, March 1, 2001.
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2024
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL RE
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I .
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND -
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
Case No. 97-19576
vs.
ROBERT R. NAST,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL
REGULATION, ("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint
before the Construction Industry Licensing Board, against ROBERT
R. NAST, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating
the practice of contracting pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida
Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material
hereto, a Certified General Contractor, in the State of Florida,
having been issued license numbers CG C007397 and CG CA07397.
3. Respondent's last known address is 4460 N. Federal
Highway, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308.
4, At all times material hereto, Respondent was licensed
as an individual and was responsible in such capacity for all of
for all field work at all sites;
and for financial matters,
both for the Organization in general
nd for each Specific job.
orth in this Count I.
7. On or about April 12,
1995, Respondent entered into the
rst contract with Las Haciendas Community Association, Inc.
ereinafter teferred to as “Customer
ain”
Plantation,
>rida 33324 for Thirteen Thousand dollars ($13, 000.00).
8. The Customer Paid the Respondent the contract price in
iL.
9, The Respondent contracted with the Customer in the name
All
) to perform the roofing
ke
10. At no time material hereto,
was All-American Painting a
properly qualified company, nor did that name appear on the
Respondent’s license,
11. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (g), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), by acting in the
Capacity of a contractor under any certificate or registration
issued hereunder except in the name of the certificateholder or
registrant as set forth on the issued certificate or
registration, or in accordance with the Personnel of the
certificate or registrant as set forth in the application for the
certificate or registration, or as later changed as provided in
this part.
COUNT II
12. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in Paragraphs one through five and seven through ten as
chough fully set forth in this Count Il.
13. Section 489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.)
rovides inter alia, that the registration or certification number
‘£ each contractor shall appear in any newspaper, airwave
ransmission, phone directory, or other advertising medium used by
hat contractor.
14. Rule 61G4~12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code,
formerly 21E-12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code), provides
iter alia, that the term "advertise" or "advertises" shall apply
> contracts.
15. Failing to include his license number in the contract
, with the Customer constitutes a violation of Section
. 489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.).
16. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (3), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT III
i7. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten, and
thirteen through fifteen as though fully set forth in this Count
III.
18. On or about April 25, 1995, the Respondent obtained
permit number 95-8112 from the City of Plantation Building
Department for the Customer’s roofing project.
19. On or about May 9, 1995, the roof work was completed
‘and received an approved final inspection.
20. The contract entered into between the Respondent and
the Customer had a seven (7) year warranty.
21. From in or around June 1996 through July 1997, several
roofs in the condominium units began leaking.
22. The Respondent failed to repair the leaking roofs in
accordance with the warranty.
23. Rule 61G4-17.001(14) (a), Florida Administrative Code,
‘provides: “Misconduct or incompetency in the practice of
, contracting as set forth in Section 489.129(1) (n), Florida
Statutes, shall include, but is not limited to: failure to honor
a warranty”.
24, The Respondent’s failure to honor a warranty
constitutes misconduct in the practice of contracting.
25. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (n), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
COUNT IV
26. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, and eighteen through twenty-four as
though fully set forth in this Count Iv.
27. On or about December 14, 1995, Respondent entered into
a second contract with the Customer to install a “Slope to Drain”
‘Roof Restoration System to condominium units #217 to 219 located
at 297 Jacaranda Drive, Plantation, Florida 33324 for Fifteen
Thousand, Four Hundred Five dollars ($15, 405.00).
28. The Customer paid the Respondent the contract price in
full.
29. The Respondent contracted with the Customer in the name
of All-American Painting of South Florida Inc (hereinafter
referred to as “All-American Painting”) to perform the roofing
30. At no time material hereto, was All-American Painting a
properly qualified company, nor did that name appear on the
Respondent’s license.
31. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1)(g), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), by acting in the
capacity of a contractor under any certificate or registration
issued hereunder except in the name of the certificateholder or
registrant as set forth on the issued certificate or
registration, or in accordance with the personnel of the
certificate or registrant as set forth in the application for the
certificate or registration, or as later changed as provided in
this part.
COUNT V
32. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
“thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, and
twenty-seven through thirty as though fully set forth in this
Count V.
33. Section 489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.)
provides inter alia, that the registration or certification number
of each contractor shall appear in any newspaper, airwave
transmission, phone directory, or other advertising medium used by
that contractor.
34. Rule 61G4-12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code,
, (formerly 21E-12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code), provides
inter alia, that the term "advertise" or "advertises" shall apply
to contracts.
35. Failing to include his license number in the contract
with the Customer constitutes a violation of Section
489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.). ~
36. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section_
489.129(1) (j), Florida Statutes (199), by failing in any material
respect to comply with the provisions of this part or violating a
rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT VI
37. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
seven through thirty, and thirty-three through thirty-five as
‘though fully set forth in this Count VI.
38. On or about June 10, 1996, the Respondent obtained
permit number 96-12235 from the City of Plantation Building
Department for the Customer’s roofing project.
39. On or about July 10, 1996, the roof work was completed
and received an approved final inspection.
40. The contract entered into between the Respondent and
the Customer contained a seven (7) year warranty.
41. From in or around June 1996 through July 1937 several
ftoofts in the condominium units began leaking.
/
42. The Respondent failed to repair the leaking roofs in
accordance with the warranty.
43. Rule 61G4-17.001(14) (a), Florida Administrative Code,
provides: “Misconduct or incompetency in the practice of
contracting as set forth in Section 489.129(1) (n), Florida
Statutes, shall include, but is not limited to: failure to honor
a warranty.
44. The Respondent’s failure to honor a warranty
constitutes misconduct in the practice of contracting.
45. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (n), Florida Statutes (1994 Supp.), by committing
incompetency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
COUNT VII
46. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
“set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
seven through thirty, thirty-three through thirty-five, and
thirty-eight through forty-four as though fully set forth in this
Count VII.
47. On or about April 25, 1996, Respondent entered into a
third contract with the Customer to install a “Slope to Drain”
Roof Restoration System to condominium units #201 to 215, #229 to
pase #245 to 259, #261 to 271, and #273 to 287 located at 297
‘Jacaranda Drive, Plantation, Florida 33324 for Ninety-Six
/ Thousand, Six Hundred Ninety dollars ($96,690.00).
48. The Customer paid the Respondent the contract price in
full.
49. The Respondent contracted with the Customer in the name
of All-American Waterproofing Systems Inc (hereinafter referred
to as “All-American Waterproofing”) to perform the roofing work.
50. At no time material hereto, was All-American
Waterproofing a properly qualified company, nor did that name
appear on the Respondent’s license.
51. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (g), Florida Statutes (1995), by acting in the capacity
of a contractor under any certificate or registration issued
hereunder except in the name of the certificateholder or
registrant as set forth on the issued certificate or
“tegistration, or in accordance with the personnel of the
certificate or registrant as set forth in the application for the
certificate or registration, or as Later changed as provided in
this part.
COUNT VIII
52. Petitioner: realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
feven through thirty, thirty-three through thirty-five, thirty-
/ eight through forty-four, and forty-seven through fifty as though
# ‘ .
fully set forth in this Count VIII.
53. Section 489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1995) provides
inter alia, that the registration or certification number of each
contractor shall appear in any newspaper, airwave transmission,
phone directory, or other advertising medium used by that
contractor.
54. Rule 61G4-12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code,
(formerly 21E-12.011(4), Florida Administrative Code), provides
inter alia, that the term “advertise” or tadvertises" shall apply
to contracts. -
55. Failing to include his license number in the contract
with the Customer constitutes a violation of Section
489.119(5) (b), Florida Statutes (1995).
56. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
~“489.129(1) (4), Florida Statutes (1995), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT IX
57. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
seven through thirty, thirty-three through thirty-five, thirty-
10
jeiont through forty-four, forty-seven through fifty, and fifty-
' three through fifty-five as though fully set forth in this Count
IX.
58. Section 489.1425, Florida Statutes, provides: “(1) Any
agreement or contract for repair, restoration, improvement, or
construction to residential real property must contain a written
statement explaining consumer rights under the Construction
Industries Recovery Fund, except where the value of all labor and
materials does not exceed $2,500.”
59. The Contractor failed to provide the Customer with
written notice of consumer rights under the Construction
Industries Recovery Fund.
60. Failing to provide the Customer with written notice of
consumer rights under the Construction Industries Recovery Fund
constitutes a violation of the foregoing provision of Chapter
489, Florida Statutes.
61. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (j), Florida Statutes (1995), by failing in any
material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful order of the board.
COUNT X
62. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
11
Py
/seven through thirty, thirty-three through thirty-five, thirty-
eight through forty-four, forty-seven through fifty, and fifty-
three through fifty-five, fifty-eight through sixty as though
fully set forth in this Count X.
63. On or about July 25, 1996, the Respondent obtained
permit numbers 96-14501, 96-14502, and 96-14503 from the City of
Plantation Building Department for the Customer's roofing
project.
64. On or about August 2, 1996, the roof work was completed
and received an approved final inspection.
65. The contract entered into between the Respondent and
the Customer contained a seven (7) year warranty.
66. From in or around June 1996 through July 1997, several
roofs in the condominium units began leaking.
67. The Respondent failed to repair the leaking roofs in
accordance with the warranty.
68. Rule 61G4-17.001(14) (a), Florida Administrative Code,
provides: “Misconduct or incompetency in the practice of
contracting as set forth in Section 489.129(1) (n), Florida
Statutes, shall include, but is not limited to: failure to honor
a warranty.
69. The Respondent’s failure to honor a warranty
constitutes misconduct in the practice of contracting.
70. Based on the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section
489.129(1) (n), Florida Statutes (1995), by committing
12
/ competency or misconduct in the practice of contracting.
COUNT XI
71. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations
set forth in paragraphs one through five, seven through ten,
thirteen through fifteen, eighteen through twenty-four, twenty-
seven through thirty, thirty-three through thirty-five, thirty-
eight through forty-four, forty-seven through fifty, fifty-three
through fifty-five, fifty-eight through sixty, and sixty-three
through sixty-nine as though fully set forth in this Count XI.
72. On or about June 8, 1998, the Customer filed a lawsuit
against the Respondent in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth
Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, Case Number
98-09126 07.
73. On or about March 10, 1999, a Final Judgment was
entered in favor of the Customer against the Respondent in the
_ principal amount of Three Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand, Three
‘Hundred Fifty dollars ($348,350.00).
74. Rule 61G4-17.001(23), Florida Administrative Code,
provides: “For purposes of Section 489.129 (1) (r) [mow Section
489.129(1) (q)], F.S., “reasonable time” means ninety (90) days
following the entry of a civil judgment that is not appealed.”
75. The Respondent has failed to satisfy the Final Judgment
within a reasonable time.
76. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent is guilty of
13
Fa
‘ having violated Section 489.129(1)(q), Florida Statutes (1998
Supp.), by failing to satisfy within a reasonable time, the terms
of a civil judgment obtained against the licensee, or the
business organization qualified by the licensee, relating to the
practice of the licensee’s profession.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the
Construction Industry Licensing Board enter an Order imposing one
or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
reprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or
renewal of the certificate or registration, require financial
restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education,
assess costs associated with investigation and prosecution,
impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is
authorized to impose pursuant to Chapters 489, 455, Florida
‘Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this { | day of , 2000.
ATHLEEN E. O’ DOWD
LEAD. CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY
[LED
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
PCP: ot /ox/oo AGENCY CLERK
Cid Beale
. wc Sead 2. (ewhon nm
DATE l-1F- 2000
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT:
Diane Snell Perera
Senior Attorney
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
401 NW 2 Avenue #N607
Miami, FL 33128
(305) 377-7115
DSP/sb
4/25/00
Case #97-19576
15
Docket for Case No: 00-004387PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Mar. 01, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Feb. 19, 2001 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames filed. |
Jan. 25, 2001 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for February 19, 2001; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Jan. 25, 2001 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Jan. 16, 2001 |
Petitioner`s Status Report (filed via facsimile).
|
Jan. 04, 2001 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Partially Held; continued to date not certain. |
Dec. 29, 2000 |
Amended Notice of Video Teleconference issued. (hearing scheduled for January 4, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale and Tallahassee, FL, amended as to video and location).
|
Dec. 28, 2000 |
Petitioner`s Unilateral Prehearing Stipulation (filed via facsimile).
|
Nov. 08, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Nov. 08, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for January 4, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Nov. 06, 2000 |
Unilateral Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 25, 2000 |
Answer to Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 25, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Oct. 25, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Oct. 25, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |