Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE
Respondent: FRED O`CONNOR SMITH, JR.
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: West Palm Beach, Florida
Filed: Dec. 07, 2000
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, January 25, 2001.
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION:
FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION .
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS O0- 49 ")
AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE,
Petitioner,
vs. FDBPR Case N° 99-83278
FRED O’CONNOR SMITH, JR.
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Real
Estate (hereinafter "Petitioner") files this Administrative Complaint against Fred O’Connor
Smith, Jr. (hereinafter "Respondent") and alleges:
ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT
1. Petitioner is a state government licensing and regulatory agency charged with the
responsibility and duty to prosecute Administrative Complaints pursuant to the laws of the State
of Florida, in particular § 20.165, Fla. Stat., Chapters 120, 455 and 475, Fla. Stat., and the rules
promulgated pursuant thereto.
2. Respondent is and was at all times material hereto a licensed Florida real estate broker,
issued license number 0355894 in accordance with Chapter 475, Fla. Stat.
3. The last license issued was as a voluntary inactive broker at 1100 N. 4" Street, Riviera
Beach, Florida 33404.
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
4. Respondent represented a potential buyer, Roy G. Clayton as single agent. The buyer
deposited $500 with Respondent as an escrow deposit.
5. On or about September 12, 1998, the buyer entered into a Contract for Sale and Purchase
(“contract”) with Jimmie McAdams for property located at 142 W. 34" St., Rivera Beach, Florida.
A copy of the contract is attached hereto, incorporated herein and made a part hereof by reference as
Administrative Complaint Exhibit 1.
6. McAdams is a real estate licensee, and listed his property with Mirsky Realty Group, Inc.
7. The contract provided that the closing would take place 12 days after the buyer obtained
a loan commitment, and that the buyer was to obtain a loan commitment within 24 days from the
contract date.
8. The buyer was unable to obtain financing, and it appears that the parties orally agreed to
continue with the contract,.where on December 13, 1998, the parties executed an Addendum to the
contract. A copy of the addendum is attached hereto, incorporated herein and made a part hereof by
reference as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 2.
9. The real estate transaction continued and on January 29, 1999, the buyer received a letter
of denial from a lender dated January 29, 1999. The buyer continued to attempt to obtain financing,
and on February 5, 1999, the buyer received a denial letter from a second lender.
10. On or about February 18, 1999 and March 11, 1999, the seller forwarded a Release of
Deposit Form to Respondent requesting a disbursal to the seller. Additionally, the seller alleges that
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
he orally advised Respondent at some point between February 10, 1999 to February 17, 1999 that
he was making a demand on the deposit.
11. Rule 61J2-10.032, Fla. Adm. Code provides in part that:
(1)(@) A real estate broker, upon receiving conflicting demands for any trust
funds being maintained in the broker’s escrow account, must provide written
notification to the Commission within 15 business days of the last party’s demand,
and the broker must institute one of the settlement procedures as set forth in s.
475.25(1)(d)1., Florida Statutes, within 30 business days after the last demand.
(b) A broker, who has a good faith doubt as to whom is entitled to any trust
funds held in the broker’s escrow account, must provide written notification to the
Commission within 15 business days after having such doubt and must institute one
of the settlement procedures as set forth in s. 475.25(1)(d)1., Florida Statutes, within
30 business days after having such doubt. The determination of good faith doubt is
based upon the facts of each case brought before the Commission. Based upon prior
decisions of the Commission, good faith doubt shall be deemed to exist in the
following situations:
1. the closing or consummation date of the sale, lease, or other transaction
has passed, and the broker has not received conflicting or identical instructions
from all of the parties concerning the disbursement of the escrowed funds)...
(Emphasis added). -
12. Respondent did not notify the Florida Real Estate Commission within 15 business days
from the date of the seller’s last demand, nor did he notify based upon the good faith doubt, as he
did not have identical instructions from both parties as to the escrowed funds. Respondent did not
institute a settlement procedure within 30 days as provided in r. 61J2-10.032, Fla. Adm. Code and
sec. 475.25(1)(d)1, Fla. Stat.
13. On or about February 17, 1999, Respondent disbursed the $500 escrow deposit to the
buyer.
14. Pursuant to an office inspection and audit conducted on October 14, 1999, during
3
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
investigation of this complaint, it was discovered that Respondent had failed to prepare monthly
reconciliation statements. Respondent had not maintained any funds in his escrow account from July
1999 to October 1999. A copy of the office inspection and audit form is attached hereto, incorporated
herein and made a part hereof by reference as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 3.
COUNT I
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of failure to provide written notification to
the Commission within 15 business days of the last demand or good faith doubt of the procedure
instituted to resolve the escrow fund dispute and must institute one of the settlement procedures as
set forth in § 475.25(1)(d)1., Fla. Stat., within 30 days after having such doubt, all in violation of
Fla, Admin. Code R. 61J2-10.032(1){a) and therefore in violation of § 475.25(1)(e), Fla. Stat.
(1998).
COUNT II
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of failure to maintain trust funds in the real
estate brokerage escrow bank account or some other proper depository until disbursement thereof was
properly authorized in violation of § 475.25(1)(k), Fla. Stat. (1998).
COUNT IT
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of breach of trust in any business transaction
in violation of § 475.25(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1998).
COUNT IV
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of failure to account or deliver funds in
4
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
violation of § 475.25(1)(d)1, Fla. Stat. (1998).
COUNT V
Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of failure to prepare the required written
monthly escrow statement-reconciliations in violation of Fla. Admin. Code R. 61J2-14.012(2) and (3)
and is, therefore, in violation of § 475.25(1)(e), Fla. Stat.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Florida Real Estate Commission, or the
Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as may be appropriate, to issue a Final Order
as final agency action finding the Respondent(s) guilty as charged. The penalties which may be
imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 475, Fla. Stat., depending upon the severity of the offense(s),
include: revocation of the license or registration or permit; suspension of the license, registration
or permit for a period not to exceed ten (10) years, imposition of an administrative fine of up to
$1,000 for each count or. offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand;
imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee,
registrant or permitee to complete and pass additional real estate education courses; publication; or
any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See § 475.25(1), Fla. Stat. and Rule 61J2-
24.001, Fla. Admin. Code. The penalties which may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 455,
Fla. Stat., depending upon the severity of the offense(s), include: revocation of the license,
registration, or permit; suspension of the license, registration, or permit for a period not to exceed
ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense;
imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms
5
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee, registrant, or permitee to complete and pass
additional real estate education courses; publication; restriction of practice; injunctive or mandamus
relief; imposition of a cease and desist order; or any combination of the foregoing which may apply.
See § 455.227, Fla. Stat. and Rule 6132-24.001, Fla. Admin. Code.
SIGNED this [5 Ue day of utly , 2000.
Lhe PLLALE
epartment of Business-and——
Professional Regulatio:
By: Herbert S. Fecker, Jr.
Director, Division of Real Estate
ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER
Sunia Y. Marsh
CaN loa Florida Bar N° 0068896
boee >) 4 | ee Senior Attorney, Real Estate
ne,
Sara B® Department of Business and
ee Professional Regulation,
Legal Section - Suite N 308
Hurston Bldg. North Tower
400 West Robinson Street
Orlando, Florida 32801-1772
(407) 481-5632
(407) 317-7260 FAX
FDBPR v. Fred O’Connor Smith, Jr. Case No. 99-83278
Administrative Complaint
SM/k
PCP: DS/MV 7/00
NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS
PLEASE BE ADVISED that mediation under § 120.573, Fla. Stat, is not
available for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that pursuant to this Administrative
Complaint you may request, within the time proscribed, a hearing to be conducted in this
matter in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat.; that you have the right, at
your option and expense, to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative in this
matter; and that you have the right, at your option and expense, to take testimony, to call and
cross-examine witnesses, and to have subpoena and subpoena duces tecum issued on your
behalf if a formal hearing is requested.
PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that if you do not file an Election of Rights
form or some other responsive pleading with the Petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of
receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Petitioner will file with the Florida Real Estate
Commission a motion requesting an informal hearing and entry of an appropriate Final Order
which may result in the suspension or revocation of your real estate license or registration.
Please see the enclosed Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights form.
Docket for Case No: 00-004917PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jan. 25, 2001 |
Order Closing File issued. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jan. 24, 2001 |
Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Dec. 18, 2000 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Dec. 18, 2000 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference issued (video hearing set for February 9, 2001; 9:00 a.m.; West Palm Beach and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Dec. 14, 2000 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Dec. 07, 2000 |
Contract for Sale and Purchase filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2000 |
Initial Order issued. |
Dec. 07, 2000 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2000 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Dec. 07, 2000 |
Agency referral filed.
|