Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: CASSELBERRY ALF, INC., D/B/A EASTBROOK GARDENS
Judges: DANIEL M. KILBRIDE
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: St. Petersburg, Florida
Filed: Dec. 05, 2001
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, September 3, 2002.
Latest Update: May 16, 2003
Summary: Whether Respondent, Casselberry ALF, Inc., d/b/a Eastbrooke Gardens, violated Section 400.28(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0182, Florida Administrative Code, as cited in the four AHCA Administrative Complaints, based on four consecutive AHCA surveys of Respondent's assisted living facility (ALF), alleging failure to provide care and services appropriate to the needs of its residents. Whether the facts alleged constitute Class I or Class II deficiencies. Whether, if found guilty, a civi
Summary: Whether Respondent, Casselberry ALF, Inc., d/b/a Eastbrooke Gardens, violated Section 400.28(1)(a), Florida Statutes, and Rule 58A-5.0182, Florida Administrative Code, as cited in the four AHCA Administrative Complaints, based on four consecutive AHCA surveys of Respondent's assisted living facility (ALF), alleging failure to provide care and services appropriate to the needs of its residents. Whether the facts alleged constitute Class I or Class II deficiencies. Whether, if found guilty, a civil penalty in any amount or the imposition of a moratorium is warranted pursuant to the cited statutes.Based on four consecutive surveys, Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent`s assisted living facility for memory impaired residents failed to provide appropriate care and services.
More
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINT.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
vs.
CASSELBERRY ALF, INC.,
d/b/a EASTBROOK GARDENS Ol- Yessy
Respondent.
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care ‘Administration
(hereinafter “HCA” ), by and through the undersigned
counsel, and files this Administrative Complaint against
Casselberry ALF, Inc., d/b/a Eastbrook Gardens (hereinafter
“Respondent”) and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine on Eastbrook Gardens in the amount of five thousand
dollars ($5,000) pursuant to Sections 400.414(1)(a) and
400.419(a) Florida Statutes.
E
sprees orion oe
Jurisdiction And Venue
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Section
120.569 and 120.57 Florida Statutes and Chapter 28-106
Florida Administrative Code.
3. Venue lies in Seminole County, Division of
Administrative Hearings, pursuant: to 120.57 Florida
Statutes, and Chapter 28 Florida Administrative Code.
Parties
4. AHCA, Agency for Health Care Administration,
State of Florida, is the enforcing authority with regard to
assisted living facility licensure law pursuant to Chapter
400, Part III, Florida Statutes and Rules 58A-5, Florida
Administrative Code.
5. Respondent, Eastbrook Gardens, is an assisted
living facility located at 201 N. Sunset Drive,
Casselberry, Florida. Eastbrook Gardens, is and was at all
times material hereto, a licensed facility under Chapter
400, Part III, Florida Statutes and Chapter 58A-5, Florida
Administrative Code.
COUNT I
RESPONDENT FAILED TO PROVIDE CARE AND SERVICES
APPROPRIATE TO THE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS, VIOLATING
58A-5.0182, F.A.C. and 400.428(1) (a) Fla. Stat.
CLASS I DEFICIENCY
eon Pempengco tyre rer ee meee peer une cemee eemeee wepmueame
sheer rye
a
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates Paragraphs (1)
through (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. On or about June 1, 2001 a survey was conducted
of Respondent’s facility. As the result of a deficiency
being cited during the June survey, a re-visit survey was
conducted of the same facility on or about July 16, 2001.
8. Based upon observations made by the surveyor,
resident record reviews, incident report reviews and
interviews conducted at the facility, it was determined
that the deficiency cited during the June survey remained
uncorrected in that the facility continued in its failure
to provide the care and services appropriate to meet the
needs of the residents. A new deficiency was cited and was
again based upon the facilities failure to take sufficient
measures to prevent resident-to-resident abuse and to
minimize the potential for falls resulting in injuries, to
wit:
a. Review of the record of Resident _ 6B on July
16, 2001, revealed that she was diagnosed with
dementia and confusion. | A note dated June 30, 2001
indicated that She had poured coffee on a resident who
touched he xr purse and physically - attacked staff _by
kicking “and hitting when they tried to redirect her.
Staff explained to her that the other resident had
RR rege re
OCR ERE RRR peers ©
Alzheimer’s and wasn’t aware he was invading her space
and gave her a table on the patio to use, which she
refused. Resident 6B’s sister reported this incident
on June 30, 2001. The sister stated that Resident 6B
was very strong when upset. Neither the Administrator
nor the Director of Nursing could say who the other
resident was or whether or not the staff sustained
injuries. An incident report for this incident was
not available. No additional measures were instituted
after the facility became aware of the June 30, 2001
incident to protect other residents from Resident 6B,
and the assaults continued, with incidents with
additional injuries to other residents occurring on
July 11 and July 14, 2001.
b. On July 16, 2001, the surveyor was told by
facility staff that Resident 1B was in a nursing home
being rehabilitated after hospitalization for a broken
hip which resulted from a July 11, 2001 incident when
Resident 6B knocked him down on the patio, kicked him
and set his hat on fire. An incident report revealed
that initially it was noted that this resident had
sustained a skin tear and denied pain. Half an hour
later an entry reflected that 911 was called when he
was unable to stand, complained of pain and bone was
ee epee penne oem ow
eter re omer
weer
observed protruding from his right hip. The
corrective measure documented was “Keep clients
separate, lighter taken from other client.” No
notations concerning the incident appeared in Resident
1B’s record.
c. Also on July 16, 2001 the surveyor observed
Resident 3B with gauze wrapping on her left arm and
was told by staff that she had been injured by
Resident 6B. Record review disclosed that on July 14,
2001, Resident 3B went into Resident 6B’s room and was
pulled by her arm to the nurse’s station, resulting in
a 4 inch skin tear to her left forearm and a 1 inch
skin tear to her left arm. The corrective measure
documented was that Resident 3B was instructed back to
bed and told not to wander into other resident’s
rooms, although she had been told twice previously
about going into other resident’s rooms.
d. During the July 16, 2001 survey the surveyor
observed two residents sleeping or napping in rooms or
beds other than their own. These were residents who
wander and like to sleep in each other’s beds. Even
though the facility state had previous problems with
residents wandering into other resident’s rooms with
CORR Sere Ccerccceremeremsr ere
resulting altercations, no preventions were instituted
by the facility to prevent this from occurring.
8. The above referenced actions and or inactions,
are violations of Rule 58.5-0182 F.A.C.; requiring that an
assisted living facility shall provide care and services
appropriate to the needs of its residents, and Section
400.428 (1) (a) Florida Statutes; requiring that every
resident of a facility have the right to live in a safe and
decent living environment, free from abuse and neglect.
9. The above referenced violations constitute the
grounds for the imposed Class II deficiency for which a
fine of five thousand dollars ($5,000) is authorized under
Sections 400.414(1) (a) and 400.419(1) (b) Florida Statutes.
WHEREFORE, AHCA intends to impose a fine against the
Respondent under Section s 400.414(1) (a) and 400.419(1) (a)
Florida Statutes in the amount of five thousand dollars
($5,000).
The Respondent is notified that it has a right to
request an administrative hearing pursuant to Section
120.569, Florida Statutes (2001). Specific options for
administrative action are set out in the attached
Explanation of Rights (one page) and Election of Rights
(one page). All requests for hearing shall be made to the
attention of Michael P. Sasso, Senior Attorney, Agency for
Health Care Administration, 525 Mirror Lake Dr., St.
Petersburg, Florida, 33701.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO
REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THIS
COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF THE FACTS ALLEGED
IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL ORDER BY THE
AGENCY.
Respectfully submitted,
uchad f toooe
Michael P. Sasso, Esquire
AHCA - Senior Attorney
525 Mirror Lake Drive North,
: * St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
a (727) 552-1435
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy and correct copy has been
furnished by U.S. Certified Mail Return Receipt No. Z 170
444 501, to Casselberry ALF, Inc., d/b/a Eastbrook Gardens,
through its Registered Agent, Rex A. Paggeot, 750 Starkey —
Road, Largo, FL 34641, on the /¢ , day of Oct ho, ,
2001.
Michael P. Sasso, Esquire
perpen, cuetn tou voy
Copies furnished to:
ALF Section
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Area 7 Office
Agency for Health Care Administration
Hurston Tower South
400 W. Robinson Street, $309
Orlando, Florida 33701
Finance & Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Wendy Adams ;
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
Administrator
Eastbrook Gardens
201 N. Sunset Dr.,
Casselberry, Florida 32707
ee
!
|
:
:
!
:
I
Docket for Case No: 01-004658
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
May 16, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Sep. 03, 2002 |
Recommended Order issued (hearing held May 15-16, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 03, 2002 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
|
Jul. 25, 2002 |
Letter to Judge Kilbride from T. Mack requesting page be removed from PRO (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 23, 2002 |
Petitioner`s (Proposed) Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Jul. 23, 2002 |
Proposed Recommended Order of Casselbery Alf, Inc. d/b/a Eastbrooke Gardens filed by Respondent.
|
Jul. 18, 2002 |
Order issued. (parties are directed to file their proposed recommended orders on or before July 23, 2002)
|
Jul. 18, 2002 |
Agreed Upon Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Jun. 19, 2002 |
Order issued. (parties` agreed motion is granted and the parties are directed to file their proposed recommended order by July 19, 2002)
|
Jun. 18, 2002 |
Agreed Upon Motion for Extension of Time (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 14, 2002 |
Transcript of Proceedings (volume 1 and 2) filed.
|
May 15, 2002 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
May 02, 2002 |
Order issued. (Petitioner`s objection to notice of filing orde of moratorium is denied)
|
Apr. 25, 2002 |
Casselberry Alf, Inc.`s response to AHCA`S Motion to Compel (filed via facsimile).
|
Apr. 25, 2002 |
Objection to Notice of Filing Order of Moratorium (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Apr. 15, 2002 |
Notice of Filing Order of Immediate Memoratoriun filed by Respondent.
|
Apr. 10, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for May 15 and 16, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
|
Apr. 09, 2002 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Mar. 18, 2002 |
Notice of Filing of Depositions, Deposition of: V. Pellot, Deposition of: L. Bosworth filed.
|
Mar. 15, 2002 |
Notice of Service of Answers to Interrgatories and Request for Production of Documents (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Mar. 15, 2002 |
Notice of Service of Answers to Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Mar. 15, 2002 |
Petitioner`s First Set of Request for Admissions, Interrogatories, and Request for Production of Documents (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 07, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for April 18 and 19, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
|
Feb. 06, 2002 |
Opinion (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 05, 2002 |
Motion for Continuance (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Dec. 17, 2001 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
|
Dec. 17, 2001 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for February 14 and 15, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
|
Dec. 13, 2001 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 01-004491, 01-004492, 01-004648, 01-004658)
|
Dec. 06, 2001 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Dec. 05, 2001 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Dec. 05, 2001 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Dec. 05, 2001 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 01-004658
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
May 14, 2003 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Sep. 03, 2002 |
Recommended Order
|
Based on four consecutive surveys, Petitioner failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent`s assisted living facility for memory impaired residents failed to provide appropriate care and services.
|