Petitioner: BEVERLY HEALTHCARE OF NORTH OKALOOSA
Respondent: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Judges: DIANE CLEAVINGER
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Crestview, Florida
Filed: Feb. 15, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, April 3, 2003.
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2004
Summary: Whether Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa violated certain regulations at the time of two surveys conducted on July 16 and November 29, 2001, so as to justify the Agency for Health Care Administration's decision to issue Beverly Health Care of North Okaloosa Conditional licenses and administrative fines.Agency did not demonstrate Class II violations by nursing home. Change in licensure status inappropriate. Administrative Complaint dismissed.
4-3-0
STATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
BEVERLY HEALTHCARE OF AT
NORTH OKALOOSA,
Petitioner,
vs. AHCA NO. 2002006631
DOAH CASE NO. 02-1098
AHCA NO. 2002026751
RENDITION NO.: AHCA-04
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE S0C Chas
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
This cause was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings and assigned
to an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) for a formal administrative hearing and the entry
of a Recommended Order. The Recommended Order of April 3, 2003, is attached to this
Final Order, and incorporated herein by reference except as noted.
RULING ON EXCEPTIONS
This case concerns a nursing home (Beverly Healthcare of North Okaloosa) that
was the subject of two notices of intent to assign conditional licensure status alleging that
the nursing home had failed to (1) ensure that the use of restraints for three residents was
for treatment of a medical condition, (2) provide adequate supervision to: prevent
accidents, (3) notify a resident’s physician of the resident’s change in condition, and (4)
develop comprehensive care plans that address patient-specific needs. An administrative
complaint was also filed seeking to impose a fine on respondent based on the same stated
deficiencies. Petitioner did not file exceptions. The Agency filed an exception to the
ALJ’s recommendation that the Agency revise the survey reports by deleting the
deficiencies described under Tags F-157, F-221, F-279, F-324, and F-325. The ALJ cites
no authority for this proposition. The Agency’s exception is that the Agency has no
authority to make such revisions or to alter the Form 2567. This is correct, and, based on
a complete review of the record, the exception is granted. However, granting this
exception does not change the ALJ’s findings and conclusions regarding the charges
made in the notices of intent to assign conditional licensure status and the administrative
complaint.
While the Agency has no authority on its own to make such changes, there is a
procedure by which this can be done through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services (CMS). The Petitioner may request that CMS review the Final Order and
supporting documentation. Upon review, CMS may request or approve changes in the
federal component of the 2567. If changes are requested or approved by CMS, the
Agency will direct the field office to modify the 2567 to reflect the approved changes.
Ultimate authority to make these changes rests with CMS.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The Agency adopts the findings set forth in the Recommended Order, which is
attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Agency adopts the conclusions of law set forth in the Recommended Order.
IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED THAT:
The deficiencies described under Tags F-157, F-221, F-279, F-324, and F-325 in
this case were not proven by the Agency and the facility’s licensure status for the relevant
period is restored to standard.
The Petitioner may request that CMS review this Final Order and approve
changes to delete the deficiencies set out in the above tags from the Form 2567.
DONE and ORDERED this 1d day of je __, 2004, in
Tallahassee, Florida. )
ALAN LEVINE, SECRETARY
Agency for Health Care Administration
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
A PARTY WHO IS ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL ORDER IS
ENTITLED TO JUDICIAL REVIEW, WHICH SHALL BE INSTITUTED BY FILING
THE ORIGINAL NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH THE AGENCY CLERK OF AHCA,
AND A COPY, ALONG WITH THE FILING FEE PRESCRIBED BY LAW, WITH
THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE APPELLATE DISTRICT WHERE THE
AGENCY MAINTAINS ITS HEADQUARTERS OR WHERE A PARTY RESIDES.
REVIEW PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES. THE NOTICE OF APPEAL MUST BE FILED
WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE RENDITION OF THE ORDER TO BE REVIEWED.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Final Order has been
furnished by U.S. Mail, or by the method indicated, to the persons named below on this
/@ day of —\ We , 2004. _
Lealand/L. McCherett; AgencyCterk
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3
Tallahassee, FL 32308
COPIES FURNISHED TO:
Diane Cleavinger
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings
The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3060
Richard Saliba, Esquire
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3
Tallahassee, FL 32308
Donna H. Stinson, Esquire
Broad & Cassel
215 South Monroe Street, Suite 400
Post Office Box 11300
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
Elizabeth Dudek
Deputy Secretary
Wendy Adams
Facilities Intake
Docket for Case No: 02-000692
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Jun. 21, 2004 |
Final Order filed.
|
Apr. 03, 2003 |
Recommended Order issued (hearing held December 17 and 18, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
|
Apr. 03, 2003 |
Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
|
Feb. 27, 2003 |
Letter to E. Moore from D. Stinson enclosing corrected first page of Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
Feb. 03, 2003 |
Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
|
Feb. 03, 2003 |
Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Jan. 30, 2003 |
Order Granting Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders issued. (proposed recommeded orders shall be due on or before February 3, 2003)
|
Jan. 28, 2003 |
Agreed to Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jan. 09, 2003 |
Transcript (2 Volumes) filed. |
Dec. 17, 2002 |
CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Dec. 10, 2002 |
Joint Prehearing Stipulation (filed by D. Stinson via facsimile).
|
Dec. 09, 2002 |
Order Granting Motion to Amend Petition to Add Party issued.
|
Nov. 06, 2002 |
Respondent`s Response in Opposition to Petitioner`s Motion to Add Party filed.
|
Nov. 01, 2002 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Oct. 30, 2002 |
Motion to Amend Petition to Add Party filed by Petitioner.
|
Oct. 18, 2002 |
Order issued. (Petitioner`s motion to allow R. Davis Thomas, Jr., as qualified representative is granted)
|
Oct. 16, 2002 |
Affidavit of R. Davis Thomas, Jr. (filed by R. Thomas via facsimile).
|
Oct. 16, 2002 |
Motion to Allow R. Davis Thomas, Jr. to Appear as Petitioner`s Qualified Representative (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 14, 2002 |
Order issued. (Petitioner`s motion for partial summary recommended order and more definite statement is denied)
|
Oct. 10, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for December 17 and 18, 2002; 11:00 a.m.; Crestview, FL).
|
Oct. 02, 2002 |
Amended Notice for Deposition Duces Tecum of Agency Repesentative (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Sep. 26, 2002 |
Petitioner`s Response to Motion to Amend Complaint (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 18, 2002 |
Respondent`s Response to Petitioner`s Motion for Partial summary Recommended Order and More Definite Statement, and Respondent`s Motion to Amend Complaintfiled.
|
Sep. 18, 2002 |
Respondent`s Motion for 30-Day Continuance of Final Hearing filed.
|
Sep. 13, 2002 |
Notice of Substitution of Counsel and Request for Service (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
Sep. 12, 2002 |
Petitioner`s Motion for Partial Summary Recommended Order and More Definite Statement filed.
|
Sep. 06, 2002 |
Notice for Deposition Duces Tecum of Agency Representative (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 05, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for October 8 and 9, 2002; 11:00 a.m.; Crestview, FL).
|
Jul. 03, 2002 |
Order of Consolidation issued. (consolidated cases are: 02-000692, 02-001098)
|
Jun. 20, 2002 |
Stipulated Motion to Consolidate and Continue (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
|
May 10, 2002 |
Notice of Appearence and Substitution of Counsel (filed by J. Gilroy via facsimile).
|
Apr. 29, 2002 |
Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing issued (hearing set for July 9 and 10, 2002; 1000:00 p.m.; Crestview, FL).
|
Apr. 24, 2002 |
Unopposed Motion for Continuance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Mar. 07, 2002 |
Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for May 7 and 8, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Crestview, FL).
|
Mar. 06, 2002 |
Joint Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Feb. 22, 2002 |
Initial Order issued.
|
Feb. 21, 2002 |
Notice of Intent to Assign Conditional Licensure Status filed.
|
Feb. 21, 2002 |
Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
|
Feb. 21, 2002 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|
Orders for Case No: 02-000692
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Jun. 02, 2004 |
Agency Final Order
|
|
Apr. 03, 2003 |
Recommended Order
|
Agency did not demonstrate Class II violations by nursing home. Change in licensure status inappropriate. Administrative Complaint dismissed.
|