| OMAR 26 ANI 15 TIVE 3 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION Aa FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, ty Petitioner, NW. ((PAre etition iP ds {oct vs. FDBPR Case N° 200182836 MARGARITA COSIO COLUMBIE Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Real Estate (“Petitioner”) files this Administrative Complaint against Margarita Cosio Columbie (“Respondent”) and alleges: ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT 1. Petitioner is a state government licensing and regulatory agency charged with the responsibility and duty to prosecute Administrative Complaints pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida, in particular Section 20.165 and Chapters 120, 455 and 475, of the Florida Statutes and the rules promulgated pursuant thereto. 2. Respondent is and was at all times material hereto a licensed Florida real estate salesperson, issued license number 696611 in accordance with Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes. 3. The last license issued was as a salesperson at Napolitano & Scaggs Realty, Inc., 1642 North Volusia Avenue #101, Orange City, Florida 32763. FDBPR v. Margarita Columbie Case No. 200182836 Administrative Complaint 4. Respondent is married to Manuel Cohumbie. 5. The Florida Real Estate Commission (FREC) revoked Manuel Columbie’s real estate license effective September 26, 2000. A copy of the final order is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Administrative Complaint Exhibit 1. 6. At all times material, Respondent knew or should have known that the FREC revoked Manuel Columbie’s license. 7. On or about February 1, 2001, Efrain and Carmen Alicea (Sellers) contacted Manuel Columbie. 8. Sellers and Manuel Columbie scheduled a meeting to discuss the sale of Sellers’ real property. 9. On or about February 1, 2001, Respondent and Manuel Columbie attended the meeting with Sellers. 10. In Respondent’s presence, Manuel Columbie explained the selling process to Sellers. 11. In Respondent’s presence, Manuel Columbie explained listing agreements; the Century 21 Seller Service Pledge; the Seller’s Real Property Disclosure Statement; and Seller’s Expense Estimate (Documents) to Sellers. 12. In Respondent’s presence, Manuel Columbie and the Sellers completed the Documents. 13. After Manuel Columbie and the Sellers completed the Documents, Respondent FDBPR v. Margarita Columbie Case No. 200182836 Administrative Complaint signed the Documents as needed. 14. At this meeting, in Respondent’s presence, Manuel Columbie held himself out as a licensed real estate agent. 15. At this meeting, in Respondent’s presence, Manuel Columbie held himself out as Respondent’s trainer. 16. On or about February 2, 2001, with Respondent’s knowledge, Manuel Columbie presented a real estate contract to Sellers. COUNT I Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of fraud, misrepresentation, concealment, false promises, false pretenses, dishonest dealing by trick, scheme or device, culpable negligence, or breach of trust in any business transaction in violation of Section 475.25(1)(b), Florida Statutes. COUNT II Based upon the foregoing, Respondent is guilty of aiding, assisting, procuring, employing, or advising any unlicensed person or entity to practice a profession contrary to Chapter 455, 475 or the rules of the Petitioner in violation of Section 455.227(1)q), Flonda Statutes. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Florida Real Estate Commission, or the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, as may be appropriate, to issue a Final Order as final agency action finding the Respondent(s) guilty as charged. The penalties which may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 475 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the FDBPR v. Margarita Columbie Case No. 200182836 Administrative Complaint offense(s), include: revocation of the license or registration or permit; suspension of the license, registration or permit for a period not to exceed ten (10) years, imposition of an administrative fine of up to $1,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not hmited to, requiring the hcensee, registrant or permitee to complete and pass additional real estate education courses; publication; or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 475.25(1), Florida Statutes (2001) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 61J2-24.001. The penalties which may be imposed for violation(s) of Chapter 455 of the Florida Statutes, depending upon the severity of the offense(s), include: revocation of the license, registration, or permit; suspension of the license, registration, or permit for a period not to exceed ten (10) years; imposition of an administrative fine of up to $5,000 for each count or offense; imposition of investigative costs; issuance of a reprimand; imposition of probation subject to terms including, but not limited to, requiring the licensee, registrant, or permitee to complete and pass additional real estate education courses; publication; restriction of practice, injunctive or mandamus relief; imposition of a cease and desist order, or any combination of the foregoing which may apply. See Section 455.227, Florida Statutes (2001) and Flonda Administrative Code Rule 61J2-24.001. FDBPR v. Margarita Columbie Administrative Complaint SIGNED this__ (__dayof Case No. 200182836 see , 2002. FILED *~ Department of Professional Regulatien Division of Real Estate . Kes ‘Le ml ACK LL/ PCP: NM/PH 12/02 ent of Business and oféssional Regulation By: Director, Division of Real Estate ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER LORENZO LEVEL, ESQUIRE Florida Bar N° 0165123 Division of Real Estate Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Legal Section - Suite N 802 Hurston Bldg. North Tower 400 West Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 32801-1772 (407) 481-5632 (407) 317-7260 FAX NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS PLEASE BE ADVISED that mediation under Section 120.573 of the Florida Statutes, is not available for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action. PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that pursuant to this Administrative FDBPR v. Margarita Columbie Case No. 200182836 Administrative Complaint Complaint you may request, within the time proscribed, a hearing to be conducted in this matter in accordance with Sections 120.569 and 120.57 of the Florida Statutes; that you have the right, at your option and expense, to be represented by counsel or other qualified representative in this matter; and that you have the right, at your option and expense, to take testimony, to call and cross-examine witnesses, and to have subpoena and subpoena duces tecum issued on your behalf if a formal hearing is requested. PLEASE BE FURTHER ADVISED that if you do not file an Election of Rights form or some other responsive pleading with the Petitioner within twenty-one (21) days of receipt of this Administrative Complaint, the Petitioner will file with the Florida Real Estate Commission a motion requesting an informal hearing and entry of an appropriate Final Order which may result in the suspension or revocation of your real estate license or registration. Please see the enclosed Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights form. 100000 Final Order No. BPR-99-08168 Date F-/5-99 FILED Department of Business and Professional Regulation AGENCY CLERK Sarah Wachman. Agency Clerk Dy. + By: *} &L STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION RECEIVED DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND ae PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, SEF 1 7 1999 DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE Petitioner vs, CASE NO. 96-83907 DOAH NO. 98-2820 MANUEL COLUMBIE Respondent F DE On August 18,1999, pursuant to ss.120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes, the Florida Real Estate Commission heard this case to issue a Final Order. Administrative Law Judge Suzanne F. Hood of the Division of Administrative Hearings presided over a formal hearing on March 10, 1999. On June 28, 1999 she issued a Recommended Order, which is adopted by the Florida Real Estate Commission as to all Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendations, 4 copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. The Respondent filed Exceptions to Recommended Order and Petitioner filed a Response to the Respondent's Exceptions to Recommended Order. Bopies of the Exceptions and Response are attached hereto as Exhibits B and s and mace a part hereof. nS The Commission rejects Respondent's Exception #1 of the Findings of Zact in the Recommended Order. The Commission finds that paragraphs 14 and 16 are based upon competent and substantial evidence. The Commission rejects Respondent's Exception #2 of the Findings of Fact in the Recommended Order. The Commission finds that paragraph 17 is based upon competent and substantial evidence. The Commission rejects Respondent's Exception #3 of the Findings of Fact in the Recommended Order. The Commission finds that paragraph 18 is based upon competent and substantial evidence. Based upon a complete review of the record, the Respondent's Exceptions and Petitioner's Response, the Commission finds that the Respondent violated s.475.25(1)(b}, Florida Statutes. Therefore, based upon a complete review of the record and being fully advised, the Florida Real Estate Commission REJECTS all Exceptions filed by Respondent and ADOPTS the Recommended Order. It is therefore ORDERED that the license of Respondent Manuel Columbie be revoked. This Final Order shall be effective 30 days from date of filing with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation. However, any party affected by this Order has the right to seek judicial review, nursuant 10 s.120.68, Florida Statutes, and to Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Within 30 days of the filing date of this Final Order, review proceedings may be instituted by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of the Department of Business and Professional Regulation at Suite 309, North ~ower, 400 West Robinson Street, Orlando, Florida 32801. At the same Ue ti time, a copy of the Notice of Appeal, with applicable filing fees, must be filed with the appropriate District Court of Appeal. oO Oo DONE AND ORDERED this 18" day of August 1999 in Orlando, = CBlorida. oO w CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by U.S. Certified Mail to: James H. Gillis, Esquire, James H. Gillis & Associates, 8424 Pamlico Street, Crlando, Florida 32817-1514; to Suzanne F. Hood, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings, 1230 Apaiachee Parkway, Tallahassee, FL 32399-3060; and a copy provided to Laura MeCgrthy, Esquire, DBPR, Post Office Box 1900, Orlando, FL 32802, this 12 ‘day of béal, 1999. JRM:JS Dads Wothirto~— ROFESSIONAL REGULATION. ESTATE, = om, o DEPARTMENT OF Pp DIVISION OF REAL MANUEL COLUMBIE, HEBRRINGS No. 28-2820 Respondent. RECCMMENDED This cause came cn for formal hearing on March 10, 1999, Hearings by its designated Administrative Law Judge, netore Hood APPE CES For Petitioner Laura McCarthy, Esquire . Department of Bus Professicnal Re O West i n dob HO iando, the Division of Administrative in Suzanne F. to the Division cf Administrative Hearings on June the undersigned scheduied the Subsequently, the Hearing, Peticioner filed a Motion to Continue on November 20, 1998. The undersigned issued an order dated December 3, 1999, which granted the moticn and vreschedulea the hearing for March id, Less At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony ci six VLUMeSsEes Petiticner titfered which were veceived n -=is cwn behalf and presented ine witnesses. Respondent cffered five which were received into evidence. Respondent offered G three exhibits, yveiat -:cense information of non-parties, shree =mhi bits, vel Li ‘D vel th w oO aA 'd ie) 3 p. oO og tt bts le be to $2 ts be wn ny ad cS) 'S QO u oO pn Be @ Q oO id 3 m 3 p. @ p oO yy 2 rel) K Q vo 1) ‘< to w 1 ie) 1 m cwned & resicence Costello lived in =o tenants who informed olicy The insurance company retained =o determine the cause cf the 5. The engineering fim made a site visit to the property is su be be Lf) pection revealed cracks up to in the exterior walls ci the garage. investigation in September was subject to 000 Ms. Bee les) Mr. COS analysi 20 sales associat profession, Ms. ry to work as Respondent w as a sales ass Sometime pri tello's, reque s on the ‘gs, Christe es. Beca. partners. as also ct weeks ja 1 and Janice Beery worked iInc., Thoice Properties when 1995, Ms. Christenson The woman, a friend of a Eriend who worked the engineering firm aim evaluation disclosed the possitie sinkhole activity to everyone who called about the property. She advised ail callers that the report was sinkhole in the file. After learning activity, rea. agents property to their customers Respondent was ct disclosed the vossible sinkhole She told nim that the engineering firm's Respondent declined Ms. Christenson's -o rim. Ms. Christenson was surprised to learn that Respondent intended to show the property to Giscliosure about the sinkhole activity. he initial phone call, Ms. Beery was ice Properties smoking a cigarette. Beery when Respondent arrived. As Respondent joked about the fact that Ms. Christenson's and Ms. Beery's first listing was on a sinkhole. 19. Respondent showed Ms. Redding four or five houses, including the subject property. After seeing the property, Ms. Redding contacted Respondent to make an offer to purchase it. 20. ‘Respondent srepared a contract ‘for sale and purchase, Seller repair present on Euyé Securit Se Tit c avm ut date cis > to mort £5 © (om) CResponcent ! : for sale and purcnase to Christenson and is. Seery, purchase price and a $500 3 wv en m AD ia] ie) io is} ft oO " oO rh + Qo K ie) F fu The counter offer ziiminated language in the contract te also deleted the la jated to $6,000 cash payment. The ym 0 offer included an additional addendum to the contract that stated Buyer acknowledges tnat there has been disclosure regarding the driveway and previous activity affecting it. Seller reserves the right to leave property on market to entertain offers. Buyer acknowledges property is being sold "AS is." 22. Ms. Christenson and Ms. Berry asked Ms. Gillian to review the lanquage in the contract addendum before they returned the contract to Respondent. After Ms. Sillian approved the end Ms. Berry returned the contract to in ct or it wm a i a s un a lon ial fa a rt @ eo] mn Oo us 0 note to that that 2 uu u The contract closed in November 1995. After painting the house, Ms. Redding moved in on January 20, 1996. Sometime in March or April of 1996, a friend of Ms. Redding's askea her if she knew she had purchased a home on a sinkhole. Ms. Redding then discovered that all of her neighbors were aware of the problem. 26. Ms. Redding contacted Richard Meyer, a professional geologist who works for the Volusia County Environmental Management Department. Mr. Meyer inspected the property in August 1996 and on three subsequent occasions. 27. In the meantime, Ms. Redding contacted Ms. Christenson and Ms. Beery. They told Ms. Redding that they had advised Respondent about the sinkhole activity prior to Ms. Redding's Ms. Gillian showed Ms. Redding a copy from the property's file at Choice Properties. Ms. Gillian cave Ms. Redding a copy of the report. 28. Ms. Redding showed the engineering report to Mr. Meyer en one cf his visits. Mr. Meyer determined that the rvroperty d 5 rt eqo+ 30. One day Ms. ing into her Ms. demolished in October it. 32. urisdiction over the Lae proceeding. Sections 33. convincing evidence ¢t 292 (Fla. 1987) 34. Section + Follows, in pertinent carage. hat The commission ma licensure, : Redding heard She asked t moved out of 1996 CONCLUSIONS a he the after the fire department OF t was safe as a dwei loud crunch as she ct tt deparctmen house and had it LAW parties and 220.569 and 1 1a) QO MM 0 OM rt yort Be OQ et te HW QP: O fF ct we the subject matter of 20 Ferris v. .57(1), of Administrative Hearings has Petitioner violated Section Turlinatoen, condemned Ms. Redding's insurance company "totaled" the property. this Florida Statutes. Petitioner has the burden of proving by clear and 510 So. 2d "10000 1D negligence, or breach o any business transaction in e or any other state, nation, or ; has violated 4 < osed by law or by the terms ing ¢ ct, written, oral, expre implied, in a real estate transaction; has aided, assisted, or conspired with any cther person engaged any such misconduct and in furtherance thereof; or has formed an intent, design, or scheme to engage in any such misconduct and committed an overt act in furtherance of such intent, design, or scheme. It is immaterial to the guilt cof the licensee that the victim or intended victim of the misconduct has sustained no damage or loss; that the damage or loss has been settled and paid after discovery of the misconduct; or that such victim or intencged victim was a customer or @ person in confidential relation with the licensee or was an identified member of the general public. Respondent is a salesperson within the meaning of tion 475.01(k), Florida Statutes, which states as follows: (k) “Salesperson” means a person who performs any act specified in the definition of "broker," but who performs such act under the direction, control, or management of anothet person. A salesperson renders a professional service and is a professional i Ss. 85.114) (a). within the meani term u iu . : (1) "Single who i) represents, , the buyer oS or seller bu th oS transaction. (ean) on 28. At all activity. He duciary duty to Ms. Redding by of sinkhole activity as a latent material defect on the property. Instead, he of the possible sinkhole intenticnally concealed the Redding inquired abouc the contract addendum 39. Respondent replied to Ms. Redding's inquiry by telling her that the language in the contract addendum related only to cracks in the driveway, which had been replaced. Respondent's response amounts ‘to intentional misrepresentation and dishonest which he knew was in the orida Administrative Code, for violations of Section circumstances: In the case of fraud, misrepresentation and dishonest cealing the usual action of the Commissicn shall be to impose a penalty of revocation. In the case of concealment, false promises and false pretenses, the usual action to the Commissicn shall be to impose a penalty of a 3 to 5 year suspension and an administrative fine of $1,000. In the case of culpable negligence and breach or trust, the usual action of the Commission shall be to impose a penalty from a $1,000 fine to a 1-year suspension. win B 43. Rule 6172-24.001(4) (b), Florida Statutes, states that aggravating or mitigating circumstances include, but are not Fact t iw gottie4 DONE AND ENTERED canis G#/cay cf cune, 1999, in . . mo” XS \\ om ON aA oO SIT ALAA AN RKO SSO jae) SUZANNE ‘fF. HOOD X ~ cc Administrative Law Judge Ce a Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building 1230 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060 (850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675 Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.7l.us */ The three exciuded documents were inciuded in the record as roffered evidence. They are identified as R6, R7, and RB. COPIES FURNISHED: Laura McCarthy, Esquire Department of Business and Professional Regulation NOTICE OF RIGET TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS submit written exceptions within All parties have 15 days from the Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommend uld be filed with the agency that will issue the F this case “oy ty, RECEIVED 610000 STATE OF FLORIDA 2 DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS.’ SUL 1 2 7999 WS Chew - ” Q FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION. DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, DOAH Case N° 98-2820 Petitioner. FDBPR Case N° 96-83907 = + Sy vs. MANUEL COLUMBIE, Respondent. , ’ / : EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED ORDER Pursuant to nonce, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Administrative Law Judge Suzanne F. Hood conducted a forma! hearing in the above-styled case on March 10, 1999, being at 10:00 A.M., at the Daytona Beach Regional Service Center, Conference Room, 210 North Palmeno Avenue, Davtona Beach, Flonda. On June 28, 1999, an erroneous Recommended Order was filed in the matter. In accord with Subsection 120.57(1)(k), Mlorida Statures. the Flonda Real Estate Commission shall allow each party fifteen (15) davs, 1.e@., July 12,1999, in which to submit wntten exceptions to the Judge’s Recommended Order. itis respectfully suggested that the Florida Real Estate Commission Chairperson and members each very carefully review the substance of the allegations contained in Administrative Complaint and then compare the record of the formal hearing and the noted exhibits received in evidence ov the Administrative Law Judge in this matter. adopt the Respondent's exceptions and be othersise fully advised prior to taking final agency action dismissing this cause. Respondent's exceptions are as follows 020000 FDBPR. DRE vs. Manuel Columive DOAH Case N° 98-2820 Respondent's Excepnon To Recommended Order July 12, 1999 - Page 2 . RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTION ONE 1. Respondent takes exception to the Judge's Findings of Fact Number 14 and 16 which findings oniy states that Ms. Christenson “disclosed the possible sinkhole acnvity to everyone who called (her) about the property’. She advised all callers that (called her) the report was in the file.” There is no testimony from Ms. Christenson in the record conceming the date and time that the Respondent had allegedly called Ms. Christenson, rather the wimess referred to the same as the “date in question” only and the Petitioner glossed over the date with “I don’t know the date.” (Hearing Transcnpt page 42. line 21 through page 43, line 14) The wimess didn’t know the date and the Pentioner didn’t know the date because there was no call to Ms. Chnstenson from the Respondent. The testimony conceming the purported conversation was either a confused recollection or out-and-out perjury on the pant of the wimess. The Respondent clearly recalled and so testified that he located the real property listing in the Muluple Listing Service printout and had called Choice Properties on a “Saturday moming” (July 21, 1995), He further provided undisputed iestumony that he had tatked oniy with Choice Properties’ employee “J. D. Smith .. the rental manager” who replied to the Respondent's property available inquiry with only, ~ I don't know. .. | don’t know if it’s sull available or not...” The Respondent did not speak to anyone else at Choice Properties during his initial inquiry concerning the MLS listing and just as there was no sinkhole disclosure on the MLS data sheet there was no sinkhole disclosure to the Respondent at any time by Ms. Chnstenson or any Choice Properies emplovee as Ms. Christenson had erroneously testified. (Hearing Transcript page 198. line 16 through page 199, Jine 18) Additionally. there is no allegation of fact that anvone informed Respondent Columbie of the sinkhole problem roe ye 120000 FDBPR. DRE \s. Mamie! Columoie DOAH Case N° 98-2820 Respondent's Exception To Recommended Order July 12. 1999 - Page 3 RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTION TWO 2. Respondent takes exception to the Judge's Findings of Fact Number 17 in that there was no allegation in the Administrative Complaint that any emplovee of Choice Properties or anyone else had disclosed the “sinkhole problem” to the Respondent. Paragraph 8 of the Administrative Complaint alleges only that “seller disclosed (to the Witness Ms, Chnstenson) that the property had experienced sinkhole problems and provided (the Witness Ms. Christenson) with a settlement claim evaluation detailing the sinkhole problems the property had expenenced.” (Administrative Complaint. paragraph 8) In Paragraph 9 of the Administrative Complaint comes “Respondents (clearly meaning only Respondents Gillan and Chnstenson) never disclosed the sinkhole problem to buyer, either verbally or in wnting. There was no disclosure on the contract.” 'i 1s improper to base a recommended penalty on findings of fact which concem issues not alleged in the Administrative Complaint. The Flonda Real Estate Commission should not continue to allow such deficient pleadings and findings 10 be “rubber- stamped” and thereafter used as a bases for a Final Order. Allowing any such “legal product” as this to go uncorrected will oniv serve to dish up the FREC to additional professional reducible and disrespect. Simply stated, the Respondent Manual Columbie was not alleged in the Administrative Complaint 10 have been informed of the sinkhole problem by either the emplovees of Choice Properties or the seller or anyone else. RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTION THREE 3. Respondent takes exception to the Judge's Finding of Fact Number !S$ as the testimonies of Ms. Christenson and Ms. Beery are patently inconsisient conceming the wirle- SMOKING-d-C12arene-Oulside Upice-chance-meesing. On or about September 29. 1997, during GUN La a) on) [om Cm ro Mm FDBPR. DRE vs. Mamue! Columbie DOAH Case N° 98-2820 _ Respondent's Exception To Recommended Order July 12, 1999 - Page 4 an interview by Petinoner’s Investigator Pierce, Witness Ms. Beery stated that she could not remember when Respondent was first informed but it was during a conversaton in front of the Choice Properties’ office. (Testimony of Janice Beery, Hearing Transcript Page 77, lines 14- 25) in a prepared notanzed statement three (3) month later, Janice Beery claimed that Respondent Columbie had been first informed by Witmess Ms. Christenson by telephone and that she, Janice Beery had overheard the conversation. (Respondent’s Exhibit 11) At hearing, in an anempt 10 rehabilitate the pnor inconsistent statements, Witness Ms. Beery testified that she remembered ‘‘standing outside taiking with Mr. Columbie and Shawna about this sinkhole ... ” and that was “after the telephone conversation.” (Testimony of Janice Beery, Hearing Transcript Page 97, lines 5-10) Ms Redding tesnfied that “the folks at Choice Realty, namely Shawna Christenson, Janice Beery, and the broker” told her “they provided Mr. Columbie a copy of the report about the sinkhole.” (Testimony of Ms. Redding, Hearing Transcript Page 121, lines 14-18) Witmess Ms. Chnstenson siated that she had not faxed the report to Respondent (Hearing Transcript Page 44, lines 10-11) and she testified that she had not attached a copy to the executed sale contract at any ume (Hearing Transcript Page 47, line 7-13) and that she, in fact. did not provide a copy to Respondent at any ume and that she was not aware that anyone else did. (Hearing Transcript Page 48. line 9-13) (It should be no surpnse that the Petitioner ad not allege that Respondent had been informed of the sinkhole problem in its Administrative Complaint for there was no evidence o; other indication that he had, in fact. been told about Respondent had no reason 10 ¢e to the office of Choice Propernes other than to delivery oS © FDBPR. DRE vs. Manuel Columbie DOAH Case N° 98-2820 & Respondent's Exception To Recommended Order July 12, 1999 - Page 5 Cc S Lucy Rodriquez and asking that it be delivered Shawna (Ms. Christenson.) (Hearing Transcript Page 200. line 1-16) CONCLUSIONS Attempting to make findings of fact and then recommendations based upon those finding of facts concerning allegations which have not been made in the Administrative Complaint cannot been allowed to stand. The Petitioner went about unsuccessfully seeking evidence conceming an essential allegation which had not made. The Recommended Order, just as the Administrative Complaint, is seriousiy flawed. The exceptions listed above should be adopted and this maner dismissed with further agency acon. Respondent requests the Florida Real Estate Commission to review this matter in its enurety and reject the noted recommended findings of facts, conclusions of law, and the recommended penalty based upon a lack of essential allegauon and dismiss this case. Respegfully submitted, HL. Gillis. Gl. Attomey at Law Counsel for Respondent FDBPR DRE vs. Manuel Columoie DOAH Case N° 98-2820 Respondent's Excepuon To Recommenaed Order July 12. 1999 - Page 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 120000 | HEREBY CERTIFY that a tme and correct copy of the above RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED ORDER has been provided to: Laura McCarthy, Esquire, Senior Anomey, Florida Division of Real Estate. Legal Secuon, 400 West Robinson Street, Orlando, Florida 32801-1772 by hand-delivery this 12th day of July, 1998. A Gl . Gillis, Esquire Attorney at Law Flonda Bar N° 162115 James H. Gillis & Associates, P.A. 8424 Pamlico Street Orlando, Flonda 32817-1514 (407) 681-9300 (407) 681-9301 FAX COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT ce Clerk. DOAH ATIN Admuinisrans LAW OFFICES 6 STATE OF FLORIDA > DEPARTMENT OF SUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION §¢20000 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, Petitioner, DBPR Case No. 96-83907 vs. DOAH Case No. 98-2820 MANUEL COLUMBIE, Respondent. / PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S EXCEPTIONS TO RECOMMENDED ORDER Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE, through undersigned counsel, hereby responds to Respondent's exceptions to the recommended order filed herein, and states: 1. Respondent first takes exception to Findings of Fact numbers 14 and 16. Finding of Fact Number 14 states, in its entirety: Ms. Christenson piaced a copy of the engineering firm's report in the property's file at Choice Properties. She disclosed the possible sinkhole activity to everyone who called about the property. She advised all callers that the report was in ihe file. After jearning about the possible sinkhole activity, real estate agents would not show the oroperty to their customers This finding of fact is supported by competent. substantial evidence in the transcript of the formal hearing. (T 39, 41, 53, 72,1<9). Finding of fact number 16 states, in its 920000 entirety: On or prior to October 22. 1995, Respondent telephoned Ms. Christenson to inquire about the property. He told Ms. Christenson that he had a client (Ms. Redding) who was a Social Security recipient and really needed a home. Respondent was interested in the property because it was within Ms. Redding's price range and had an assumable mortgage. This finding is also supported by competent, substantial evidence in the transcript. (Petitioner's Exhibit 7/Respondent's Exhibit 11; T 42-44; 56, 58-59, 74, 81, 141). Respondent argues that he testified otherwise, therefore the Commission should not adopt these findings of fact. However, the administrative law judge ("ALJ") is the trier of fact in this matter. An administrative agency may not reject the [administrative law] judge's findings of fact unless there is "no competent, substantial evidence from which the finding could reasonably be :nierred.” Ferris v. Austin, 487 So.2d 1163, Fla. Sth DCA 1986) citing Heifetz v. Depanment of Business Reg., 475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Therefore, findings of fact 14 and 16 should be adopted. 2. Respondent also asks thai finding of fact number 17 be rejected. Finding of fact number 17 states, in its entirety: Ms. Christenson disclosea the possible sinkhole activity to Respondent. She iold him that the engineering firm's report was in the file. Respondent declined Ms. Christenson's offer to fax the report to nim. "is. Christenson was surprised to learn that Respondent intended to show the property to Ms. Redding despite the ciscicsure about ihe sinkhole activity. Ut: £20000 Respondent contends that the finding should be rejected because the administrative complaint in this matter did not specifically state that Respondent was told by Ms. Christenson that the sinkhole problems existed. Whether the administrative complaint specifically alleges that Ms. Christenson disclosed the sinkhole activity to Respondent is irrelevant to the finding of fact by the ALJ. §120.60(5), Fla. Stat. requires that an administrative complaint provide "reasonable notice to the licensee of facts or conduct, which warrant the intended action.” Contrary to Respondent's assertions, paragraph 9 of the administrative complaint refers to all respondents. This is clear as the allegations which do not refer to all respondents state the particular respondent(s)' individual name(s). The ALJ's finding is supported by competent, substantial evidence, and is not outside of the matter of whether Respondent knew or should have known of the sinkhole activity, and whether Respondent breached his fiduciary duty to Ms. Redding. |i should be adopted in its entirety. 3. Respondent takes exception to finding of fact number 18, which states, in its entirety, that: Sometime after the initial phone call, Ms. Beery was outside the office of Choice Properties smoking a cigarette. Ms. Christenson was with Ms. Beery when Respondent arrived. As he walked into the office, Respondent joked about the fact that Ms. Christenson's and Ms. 8eery's first listing was ona sinkhole. This finding is also suppomed by the transcript. (T 82, 86, 96-97). Responcent Is iting to rearque issues already argued to and rejected by the ALJ. Because the finding is suoporied by competent. supstantial evidence. shouid 5e adopted tn its 820000 CONCLUSION Both the administrative complaint and the recommended order are in compliance with all applicable statutes. Neither 1s flawed as Respondent claims. Undersigned counse! respectfully requests that the ALJ's recommended order be adopted in its entirety, and Respondent's license revoked. Respectfully submitted, YP Z aura McCarthy Deputy Chief Attorney Florida Bar No. 0973610 DBPR Division of Real Estate P.O. Box 1900 Orlando, Florida 32802-1900 (407) 481-5632 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE | HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by U. S. mail to James H. Gillis. Esq., attorney for Respondent, 8424 Pamlico Street, Orlando, Florida, 32817, this Sot cay of Qu 4 . 1999. Nh (4 7 Jira McCarthy rT 4) Pj da f STATE OF FLORIDA i) DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL andidaten FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION “GINA Lee I DEPARTMENT OF 3 PROFESSIONAL REGULA Petitioner, FDBPR Case N® 96-83907 97-80936 MANUEL COLUMBIE, 97-80937 JEANNE D>. GILLAN AND SHAWNA LEE CHRISTENSON, Respondents. é ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT COMES a bereinafter referred to as "Petitioner," Compiaint against Manuel Columbie, Jeanne >. Gillan, end Shawna Lee Christenson hereinafter referred to as "Respondents," and alleges the following: ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF MATERIAL FACT state covermment Licensing ana with the responsibility and cuty to emplaints pursuant <9 the laws cf the =icular § 20.155, Fla. Stat., Chapters 220, 455 and 475, Fla. Stat., ana the rules oromulgatecd cursuant theretc 2 Respondent Mantel Cosuncie is was at all times materizi hereto @ Licensed Flerica rea-+ =stere salesperson mumcer in é with Chapter <75, Pla The last License Lisuec wes mn iGlenal Realwy ti Volusia Int : rovicence Flerica = Case No. $6-63907 3. Respondent Jeanne ©. Gillan is and was at all times material hereto a licensed Florida real estate broker, issued license number 0161812 in accordance with Chapter 475, Fla. Stat. The last license issued was as a broker-salesperson without a en adéress of £57 Little River Loop #228, 3. Respondent Shawna Lee Christenson is and was at all cines material hereto @ licensed Florida real estate salesperson, issued license number 06221221 in accordance with Chapter 475, ria. Stat. The last license issued was 25 a salesperson without a current employer and an address of S11 W. Fern Drive, Orange 5 At gll times materiel herete, Respondent Colomoie was Tne arent for tne cuyer. we Case No. 26-83907 Columo:e 8. On cr ebout August 21, 1995, seller signed an exclusive listing agreement with Respondents Gillian and Christenson. At that time, seller disclosed that the propert , r is Y had experienced sinkhole problems, and provided Respondent Christenson with a settlement claim evaluation detailing the sinkhole croplems the property haa experienced. Copy of 9. Respondents never disclosed the sinkhole problem to verbally cr in writing. There was no disciosure on Colompie as T3 th reasons eriveway in the addendum to the centr2ct, but Respondent Colompie told suyer Based upon whe fcregoing, Respondent Columbie is cuilty of or mreacn cl trust in any cf0000 lumpie DBPR v. Manuel Cs COUNT ITI Based wpon the foregoing, Respondent Shawna Lee Christenson is guilty of misrepresentation, culpable negligence, or ‘reach of trust in any business transaction and violation of a duty imposed by law in violation ct § $75.25(1)(b), Fla. Stat. COUNT IIT foregoing, Respondent Jeanne °. Gillan is supervise salespersons 4s >equired by § 475.C1, Fla. Stat. and therefore in violation of § 475.25{1)(e), Florida Real Estete commissicn <> issue a Final Order as final agency action as charged. The penaity for each count or separate cffense nay range "rom 8 Tepr-~ na; an administrative fine not to exceed $5,000.00 per violation; z2ll cf as crovided for ty 9 455.227 end § 475.25(2), Fla. Stat. and Fla. IA Manuel Colump:e Case No. 26~63907 ive Complaint ‘}) vio) Btw 1997. 4: th SIGNED this © day ¢ C . FARRELL, Secretary Departéent of Business and Proféssional Regulation by:’ Henry M. Solares Director, Division of Real Estate ARNEV DETTTT rD Laura McCarthy Florida Bar N® 0973610 Senior Attorney Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Legal Section - Suite N 308 Hurston Bldg. Nortn Tower 400 West Robinson Street Orlando, Florida 22801-1772 (407) 481-5632 (407) 317-7260 FAX 20/30/97 LM/k NOTICE 7m RESDON SENT S mn under § 120.573 5 2 , disputes involving ‘532 PL Rights withic Petia meticn vour 2 the en wi THIS FOR? 1S BEEN APPROVED BY THE FLORIDA ASSOCIA™"“ OF REALTORS® AND THE FLORIDA BAR. . a : tw ( COR LLCO. PARTIES: Pra a ——__— K ORAM A LO DI ana 2 frome 2 Say agie av Deoer thaw tor ond Bure’ Brat Br We [onOen® hee rrooery ane Tersone: -fooem \GusGmTe T.SIETY | Yoon we weowwe senme one ore oe NCLUDE Sianaarce tor Ren Estate i/ansacuona | 2 AnORg | On Ine feverne aoe OF [NS CHeO NOTRIO BNO FORT BNO BOOED IO oe Lon sO tor Suse aoe furcrese | COTS 1 DESCRIPTION: . Z a \ J proce wocaiv «ALLA St A comm fone OT wo Eile KK PST pel lead (2) Lpgas oeacnavon 0 La tpt dken OS CE FIRE = a EE DOS ke LEI Sar A (oy Sues eooress, cy. 25, of me Propeny a CS = = 2 ie) Perens Proveny: GEOL PO ae Pr mrnd FAP RP Ai erg Tat Li he Derma Fawn ll mercy as ce men 5S Ll nh org naa 0 PURCHASE PRICE .. PAYMENT: : 7 - 7 . t, Tene D>) /pald A Le na wdetr aA ey | 1a) Degoss her in eucro" Ow {D) ADCO es B ECOW OF DORA wriTen tas O#wneo in Paragragn 11) 1 ne amour OF. Ie} Saeea 10 AND ALsuMOWON OF MONDAYS 1 C0OG FLANOENG 1 1AYOr OF Awe 72 cesta . gaye aner Efecuve Dai Rang an BOOT KTEIe DreRErH ORCIOE BALANCE Of 10} Purcrese moray MOnoAge 2nd Ole (hee BGOBNOLUTY Wn (he ArMOure Om Q.. 191 Orner. po ied YY See 1) Batre wo ose by US can LOCALLY DRAWN cerned oF Cainer § Check OF MO-OA/TY HAN KAR WO ROmARIRMENEE NG OFDY RiROE <=" a TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER: EFFECTIVE DATE: FACSIMILE: II Innogy no MnecneD Dy enc Ceewured = ax nerve OA FACT OF EXECUTION comwranmce, in Toy a hat al A . arang Detmeen me canes ono ovrore CLL ae Oe as uve © OIION, Oe ImewTeD 10 Durer ena Ht One! wanoraem ine cae or Connect £2: va) ee Un Wee Oat wren Art aA! Oe OF Ut Daven Arg pene Mak MeaTed Wren ONE! A lacawmenm CHOW OF Way Ora BE BNO Br Raaratae rasman sae be Loneaavee 11 ea purDOReR Os Lim Vv. FINANCING: FCMECK ONLY CES Ua ama, an ecnumuacne, OF 4 a RIO OF MOR mACnE Te nnn tor Fe [Oe ber we mane eoouMeOn wen ayye anes Erecee Cate or to CROOUE AAO ONO AON MeeE FOND 9 Acme en ne OMnOGE AMOUR, AnD 6 Kern oF ferme One CONGHONE Ct ihe CONWTRErE BNO DOL ne IER buwer enam Day as Oar Femsonacee Gucenca 1 DOWN Ine Gan COmTeuTaN £na, Merman, 10 Raley Fe Theres none to couan ve cornmimers OF Ihas K) wane BYYS & DOM UNDE frat RUDDETEGTDN waren Inv wine tor OOuEnG Ine CowTemnaera 6 shier ences enor cre eeien when aches Dany Vheraane, Ov wereven ROUCE 10 IW GLE, Mey CANER Win GONITEC AnD Bure Brae me renunoea In BeOOr ” 1b) Thee aamteng morgage Cexcnoea n Hermormnn WiC! sDove nae ICMECK ONLY ONE): 0 & vanmcne were rela or Ka ineo ruareas (are of pet errean AL Are ever 0 NO RARE, UL nCRRAReG, IO rane nad NOt SACRE * per arremn Seem onaa mame 7) dave ener ENeome Serenn n suaremers wom saan mnOndaoes Maung DICTA DAAC mened of oNyranL aera Fae ono mesma merce ¥ Lures Aah Borpee WO aAMerS » OTA Maree nocrovar o# over Dy Ihe MONGADSS Kor ALLYTIONON, Inen Cuver Sad BFOTNENY COLA fre MeromnaArY ADEREREON RO Cuperey COmEnes Wwe Fenn £19 Fue MOT + 1s /25 0 inet pe pas br Buyer, Buver M601 ecDMORRO by mOnGAgE Of ie Femaneneree 1 ELLEN + ron i emOeee OF Pie BLAINE ARO Soke OF Dune may feecnd Ines CONETmE! fry ewmen ramscH $0 174 aes Ihe werrm ano COnomans oF Ne yee wenaier Rome Hs00 mieten Ane mrarerecpee CRATEELI NON 10 © #CaeO 1 neneranoe uh ie leer oF nn CONTAC OF moraEgee Manes #678 DAO meee RES 8m 10 DAY Le INCI mae a eT oes LANE Or area HCC e CTe Oem. Vo TLE WENGE: Aten e. save pevore conng ani, bun nO Rarer Man CELL TAVE Anat Kiker tecemens wrinen momacaton avi heya hat conned ¥ COMRemarE @ DREN B001(rRO tO Ihe IOAN a hLUTIOMN As or ovromO Wn Hareenmore 1418) OF 10) ROWE, OF AOE te Reet SR FORO FCI Grrr, ICHECK ONLY ONE 2 Vad pai Somer © exponen Bre eons wy purer « surrey Ov dure What #1 Gaver ® stpenee ODuen i scooroencs wn Sanaere A ICMECK DiLY OMEN: anew ee or Prue AOD OKT ITE Leh MnOKCR® COONEY OF ANITA ALIOG BA OAC ARDRAOrWE! AIT AILEY CRONE 27 Come FOMEY OF ROS STATS ST oe ? vé CLOSING DATE: Tha wananouon tras pe oved ano ine Oued Ang OWE Gowre papers pewmerme on” L EPL See oe neee Dy Caner eosin OF ia Co Cronmonmone Ang Gther (ecu amen RESTMCTIONS: EASEMENTS: LIMITATIONS: Bue anau Une mie esommc 10, COmorenermns ana uae pene, rong TeeincHore no GA Ue fns\ OF OULerem COTTETON 10 V8 BUDORARON OUD NURY GAAeNTuA O 1OCDTD leanmemerind a4 40 D4 OLD CO 2D eee 9 ROW A 0 Une Ree Ore nnn DLT reN AbeeE Mere! LaAee WO veer 0 Ark A) OMG NO mumUON OF IA Kr vu, Dy QOweCnMerEA! MANDY (4 KINCHONE And Mane Acoma 0 Fhe as Kroterry mre And OK PROF Ian 1 Hel mn ween ak 10 we fea OF NORM Eres O75 Une tumenouere VeAlh ALIATIED MONOAQAL ANC OUICAIEY MONEY MAZGADE RTA ANY ( Oar LALA. Kee Fereoracn AV\ DiOwomd Vial Tere Dew es ALn- aad pwr Sener DIA 6 Proper A enlace 1 Oe remec OF OCCucmG BevenD OOENG Ine Tac ae OF OUD nem kh OLE Hsia Are ROS On Ot meri ye oF Ine MeDOmTY bor WI, ODSUPANCT: Sener warren vial inere aie no Bande 1 OCCUOANEY ore Han 1 OCCMORNEY 4 16 De Develo Dee OOMNG BUve EbhuTS 0 errnO 1D Neve BCLANeO FIODEY Ik @ERuNG CONCEON #8 OI Ime OF LaAI GORUORTEY Uwe. PEWRITTEN Of HANOWRITTEN PAOVISIONS: tvpeennen a Ranomrman Growers, EBS ATO BOQeNOS Anau DOFMrTH RE OTrEeO Oro>rmas We OF Wee CON ME) EONS re XK, RIDERS: (CHECK tome noees mrecn are ecomomcns AND are sangre t0 Tue Corerecr: ta) O COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRX Une RIDER 'e1O FHA RIDER igo 1B) CONDOMINIUM MDER 141 INSULATION RIDER “a "YT TAS IS ROE R na 16) a FOREIGN FIVE STMEN) Im REAL PROPERTY 145 AD? RIDER Kh ASSAGMABILITY {CHECK ONLY ONE! Bureodl may pation and Niettoy Oe femanas IDM any RunTer aaomty Under Inia CORRE od May anaagn xn MOL De rose uroes rm Conrea! 6f mar nov axaon inn Conma. eo Hor XML TIME: Time wo me eamence of tm Conan INL DISCLOSURES: Bure WRECK ONLY ORE acanommaper 0! J Sowa Aer BCAnOmmOoe Fecmar 0! Ine AgencYINsOOrVEN#IOY Ene encY Rang Comoenns von Eropeny pases Expenae LLDOLUE AA ITUNG ANG | RDOMLADIE INE MERGRIOT mormmomeers As MOC UO O1KC0 8 Os Te BUYER'S INITALS LIV, MARIMUM REPAIR COSTS Senet ense non on responbine tor ine DayTrewy OF COBU Wn RC wES 0! ws Oe Df vesonars ano iecas unoe Siancare Q Ii! bia, then 2% Of te Furcnase Pca) = yt aera or rebar anc lecacament unde! SIANOATE AM Guang, Ten J OF ye kurcnane nce: on apoenoum ona CHEEK MERE XV, SPECIAL CLAUSES: I" asgruone! vanes. reowed # FULLY UNDERSTOOD SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TC SIGNING ON OF REACTORS ANG THE FLORIO BAR Dances raneecnon lems ang Conon febieg persons THIS HSN TENDED TS BE A LOGAGLT SENDING CONTRACT If NOT “HIS FORM MAS BLES APPROVED BY THE FLORIDA ASSOC, iron Ib! be ONE LOPE BAG COMOMOA 9 CONDE Bout De soieored OY Ine Denes nF On ING fe koeC ne RE OOCIES AECL TRING DOMBOT Os 0) SEDrO re Ones ROL CONENIUIE 9m OD: The negove lee oa sec 4 / 49 ae ME meee [Ow ae n cee ae law AF tae . vate Tae Soom pecan oF fae Lan) = STANDARI 2 REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS : Ang When Ce nied as ee eC OF an cammnee 1M CUETO lee HA ERG. wow wea at rend BOLMATY BIER on ROH .rIDENCE OF UTE cal anec ree perenne eo TDE SIE YCMTNEN tMRCHNG HU 10 Had Res PUER AY ce than COMMERCE ST ITE HANNON! CUCM: FECORRS OF bUCD Unter aaIe as May Gr Cublomany # He County dane a PUN OF FERRO bapt@Or Dv Hat MONOAORE UIA Hume Gad 16. A UE AMAL LET TAMER ewED De 4 Fela weaONED hie Hummes ourmeme Xo Bae MO BITE wanes ane Gr ine oe 1 DUVeL AN Owen b Lomey OF MUN RMUTANED INE MONTY GIR BUTERA Ne Oe mEUINE Bure DUE 10 Ihe mee: LODE NY seve! GUT 5 OA romances MaHOAA NEL 1UAN I they COAUAE ANG INODE RANA PRay OF GECNAOED GY DOME A: 0! DEIOIE COMNO Dew! Lnae Convey Mavameagae mene sem OO me caer ennncanons vocemeg Wine: CONNEC! Malaruias £00 MILE DE DAIETTARE BELOILING 10 AOOMLADA ne plancarOs 40D00FG Ov manana @ 1Per Feree sat ae OnvE. # aDEMAGL OF 5 GREE hime CORAM RMIT OM CALE OV LEC FTRMNCD OI (iet 1O RaaiTENe HO LMe m Raeno QemnEre Derren ANAT Me CTE DENT AT meMINO ROMEO LEACHED HM OFNeCS! wee fave ae Geek HOM HeC ena 0! SONTE WO femme AN SmimCA Keates cee cmon 1D) QAYS. BNE! @eOuteinan br fhe irony 1301 GAY DRAG Daawe mTmeA ROVCE LO DTHET BNET 1's ELEN THE WME 10! + itamavacne Gena TO eMaes |<. Diet OF te! EOUPSURD B IEIYNO 0! OROOMIIE) Dad RICA SOAK eMEGRALOW be te IimeO 1 Ouran & Curve! Maan WO BO ROUTy Line SUNG UNMAre RIO USE QORM ENON IO CONC: OENECHS 1 INE tea meaner ie err Ban eure! mavey ie UE IECIE 0: ECERME a ithe) oF LEDOWILS INET teeanane Besee: on! Lit pr enereo OF DDYON! Colne Ur a ebwiamee on CCIE NE Caen HEECIOS GOP Chuniy muerem meas ODEN OF COREG OF IR PRMMAC HON Ine SUSM MET Base MCCAINS ae Lesa werrnnancen owt WM UNTa RelA ones nach Duvet ser dep mareh winks) Devee sabe ULE Lem QON 87100 10 Femowe wie ee Ure OU 10 Rave act amed me me ay ines a ewe Bnet Fy Cie DIE IO LEM OWE Me DEMeC enna the nme s armed INE IeIOr Bure pemee Gere nee peuse NOHO DE ce pene! HOI an WANT Chere nts OORT IS Cone. eonenast MONET VORTGAGE, SECURITY AGREEMENT TO SELLER 4 cvicnase moner monosae anc monasoe noir 10 vee! way C1OTON 1 & W-Oay grate Gem 6. Um Shak OFOwGE 101 RON! ©! DIEDRYMERI He nGne (Yn Due Heenan DENMNN Babe Caress A) MONOADE BAG 4 1D-Oay Oboe GeNOG #4 SECOND O' aha! MoNosOT Or tha rien Progeny, ara teouie eH DI REMY ANG ANCUTIOI REET 1 OF AED! I GOOD FLAROAND ANG 2 O10 MOGHRaimie Dr OF Rene ROWRTEAS WE Om! Ofme Fg macrusd pastas, oF nsceance EONIBENG 2 SUTOKID MONGROS® Cube CONC BF MMOIOWEMENE IOLALe OF Ih mew FrODeNT SDAIN 8 80 4% MORO HOWE Hn af aflame eine 0 UNO Raunt Pini Senet 1 Lowe ont Gasnmmenannn MUG 9+ ete mek MrODETY Mm mae De OE HAN LAAN NI vem oF Geta no Lon in event O° aEbL dian @Oue Our Ane ern esa eMeG COVel eos BnaorMeMments cen ims ah@ heCulny AO/mererT Ln Be pUVermee «1 10" BNO COTere fwaumeD bY Seuet bun Samer may Give eons Cawtdt ee nce aie keene agement lene wenden Gr kasenee a Ana SNMAMMONE OF Gere OF NoUUnM nme OCA Hine oem bee eT Crooeny 270 anes Dene Coowereo OF BLEQne|D WH 8) Somers COLEM, De mutes 10 IME wen ors LecurRY AQiewmers eraerEEe Or cE Troneror Ine hh#) DAWMerE mre @FCRRE Ie Ceram Beymer Termon LQUAVES. cures @) Durer k MADeree euren writ amomed 10 Osime nouns 0! Wil AO 10 gaamrare Lame may eo ee ian uaa SACIOAGTE Rife On has HIODERY pF INa| enDTEeMETHs OCAIeD OF Mem FrONERY eNcloAch On LeIOACA Hues CuLemenie STII cocenaeu or apomcanwe COverrementan faoumnOh Vid BATTS efime EOMSYAAE 6 him Genet, DTTERMITES: Ewves, a: ouvers rere # irae apw Wibdine ACO MENMTUte THE KARMON OF Rion DAMAGE HOM erTme ueSIAMON HI Ine FrODENY I! ae gs mann orien tO Rave (OM O WERRnM # letamed #ilmale® DY INe UOREO AND BE BAmEON MEDETIED BNO vHiNTUIED by 4 meninau Ouse oF Weenetin CONAN OT Neeeee Taku o wemment nd 1e08v oF As DameGa U0 10 Ie AmoUN Gromenc mr PermorAon AIVIAI ShOWO eLumeieo CoM gaceeo wit munen, ure Muse news oe OND Bt ane ite caines tercmeot OF COPeE mca binant @euerinue OF OFrHn) IAA ONE IO DAMM OC Dever MAY Ome WO DOCH Wenn ae herImAchON, eran were envres Bras eer TL inne nee nm Paayent LIVIA) “Lermens inet Bm Gmemee 10 COS eH ODD URE Ov OF Ganmnm Linuntmy 10 te remaneG noes rr Frome Fett weeaayere BNO MAN OIE HEAL ANG OBIAL 44 Domes may come aes etre ave ie Heel POOR TY purvered ONO Conmme By 2 Hromeee Fires LaO8 ae suerte ee manana et He ROH Canter > on AS TMC RESS ANO EGRESS. Sever wartena and leprenann nal ines a noress ano wormED 10 Ine Hes! HiODEny AVINWM Or ay muenOwO use a4 OwacrEmO m Ha wOr An Yi maregt we y eerecr 10 NAC CONGUE S mH DUANOATD A LLASES, Senet eras ROLES INAN 1D Gaus DetOre Cpt iUITEn 10 DuvE! Comes 01 Bd wrnen Monee ano eh! k AOwaNGed Jerk ONO REGEN OFDOLNE 0400 Ov Fee f Somme my wAEDm 10 GOIN RUC Mane! Irom warn Tenant COG ERE HOM CACHE ROBCTYHNO Wee Rane BNO Cus AWOn OF Ue Ihe Kame veCrmnmnn Bee De Karenrns Ov chan 6 OCcUBANCY 14% emer wreak, at LAMAR Otetne NO ebm ren nds Lee Gna wn Me LOFT OF A Some b ANee 0 BUve! MAY MamReNer COMA Henanes IO LONI bucr worrmaees caw ie Bw: ees me anen 10 Dy CHEN'S Denes BARN rerrebe 10 DUVE! a! Ne OF CLOUD ON AMOR ANeLUND 10 Me ROMNEY UNWELL DINE TERLe OLOMOED IO! Mele 0 Perera? Teen 0 URGAHED HITE NAT Me Sener ARE OteeeY temane OF Saree OF COASINATION HAMS eoeLUIEO Dy a1 OFMOLAY LOM ACIOY Leumit 1 DRHOT A HER BTHOAMI REINO IDFA Ind Nemes OF au KUN DORI LON EOIN SUDEOMAAOL buaLeerd BNO Mrunsersaaman Ano LUnTe! ecm a ween ts bean BECEW Oh a Veh 1 COM RUMOR MN OF & Cate Or OAALER Nave PEA O40 01 mn Ue Band 41 COAG OF IMs Lanes! PCAC GF CLDEING CoiSINO BTLAH Ow Tees 17 Wie COurey ener man tne meds IDOE RY 6 KKBIAD AL ING ONO OF Ie BNOTTIeY OF OINer Cavey eurarn wee wnn tes UY 9m TUME PLAIOD. in Pomonming Ue DOAGOL O/ MAD WLAN Out 10) GAYE DaurOaE DuNDEVE AO ELLA OF RALONE: MOA MOMOA YE Eee Ee watnaden Als Erne Omearae DM Owuned AO M91 %m TU fae 0 OF 6 DsIWOIN SunGAT OF A Wom NOMAAY wes winena 10.5 000m Oo We rem Cxmuiene Gr DOCUMENTS FOR CLOSING, Some snus Reninn ine Ome Dv) OF Lan COMM UCHON Men @nidawe Der ® DODMA RMON ANCE ereny 2n0 CONSORT ARITUMRONIL Bure! Ena KT GONG SIMeMETI MonoAce MONROE None Kec ulTY BOT EwmNENE BIO HNRNEIO alaererit CRP ENSES. Gokemiemaly $ANON OF Ine Deed BRE TECOTONG 0! COTHOMS FuNirUmeND Shak De OF DY Sener [:OtUTINNMATY LLUmO® AMO MarR tes Un Ihe Cuncsa te mee praape 2nG BY ONGAOE Abb? AND FOCOTENO Of UuChase Mone MONDAOS 10 Deum Oeed ANC NRANONG timers Aan O4 Onn bv Ou: STPRORATIONS: CREDITS. Tasen, suuesareran lem vuerahl Wuuearie Ano OVE! eeomreme ano Ievernne 0: HTODETW enue On Brolerea Huon Gay Meters (0kETG OVTe AMA Te he eau Ut Ung Ore BA AIEENG DOUCMEN UF Pen MnEH = ALUM 9) mR Ore Orommns kd DO OFFAL CaM Ot LiCRarND Anat Lue Raine OF GwtseaunG ae ITE 4 Towne mt Ue perewOn) FIO MDre eet OF MAGE HV OVON Oy O10! 1 OCLMAANEY ¥ OEUOANEY OLS DONO COUNG AOVENEE 19H ANG KmcUnY DepoEAL wu Om Crro~eO 10 Ovret a0 ¢ ID OnOotN eee on amowe wn Ov C1ROrEO 10 Sener FAsen Anat De DID Meg GA OF Te CUTOTE veas E LBY en Cue AMOmance maim Kv maseran #noreraane ONCE NOrmeseS #o #0 ONT Drerenora 1 CIOUNG OCLAHE Bo Ole when me Cte Cee kOe m OO NERD AND LINTON emey § RARMRAITOOH ay muADRE \Aey ont Dm ROY BIeD DANAG WON BACT ASMBOATENS # se reer: monnon 1 CAdterd Sees» BARBAAMere nO pramaben Inen lkkan en be OTOP Ory me BRO years Ut || Mere ase Gomemaiee emoruremeras on iw Heat Hy0oetY Oy new 161 01 Oa © CORIND NCH ENOTEMTeETerY Mere NOL Ht BAmeER OF JArManry 18) OL Mb ONG! vee! Ihen swe Krke be CuO biNg Dano YOUN Fw ONO ven!» MAGS WD A A ier 10 Oe OOF REG UCN Lupa We hanaie LEED Sere feinett One Cat rina IONE Linwity HOEY ADOTARme Hr AN enorme anumaanners Hanan TO Corman eis (Tilloe eremouons Aim Mk BLOF eMON Cane G0 Bn whenmeee eiuld B/ IROME (OAM Cure: OF Dame! Ce BULLAE THN 10 MOKED ULION Houmas OF Lae ten On Comoran, wa @ RbWenrerS LIMO REC On Ine Gobind baleen . cP ECIAL ASSESSMENT LIENS, Canswo Covermme and 1AiMed LDBLUA ALM LAMM mens £1 0! G11 1 FIOHMO INO AA OF Eeerve (141) Bre WO OW bard Dy Sener Hered seMs As 0! win OF CIOMNG Bhat tet AnMaumbG OF GLiveH HIRE WTOTOrerTETt Rad Ober MuLA/RA IY LOTION MED BL OF ERMC We LAle any GenoIne Ken Huw OF Contm@erNO CrneMO Coremurs OF 1 elim) dd Dene! AN 8) OED OF CAM OBO AN AMOUR mOKe KO Ihe eR) @azenaie OF BLnemarrern IO: Ire ITOTEwerTeE re Ey IMe PRsOut, DAOKTY SM SPECTION HEPAIM AMO MAINTENANCE: Samer worms tne. a2 OIC Cav pro WO DOME Ine Camo TOO ICRA Ine (ance 4 SOF MOWAT AAD COCR OW OO NO Mare ary VISIBLE EVIDENCE 0! ene, mater OAmAG® OF NIUE CAmnDe ONG Ine! Uw MeOME Iam, OOO Be A DOwA AY DITION The No eounng WArtAnny L/S Le wTiO 10 thie Meme RDemend ett in ity wranewne bulernn CURE OF Ren OF OOLMMem, ODE ak Lee SURG LUIREL AREBITAO IRS! INeLe Rive Deen RO IMOOreMenS OF HROMEN IO INE FIODENY HO: mY Gays eT WONmIaTY Dee wumad Care Ut Latitand ee ON ee eee suntan NO Mareneuminn NCTM ms teen ee TRAN OMe MOE eT remem AA nents OF ALAR MEARE AND MONAQES #1000: 10 KORA) BRO weMeRO! ANG eer wo date MUON Seam PON d! ME AKT COON wreck LAUTOIG Breueme ana matron ora mn WORKING CO: ciene UIDMOEO Fan BGORAOUN Buyer Mby Al DuRe b OAD Fare MLCRCUONE MUG OF [NOME Hams Dy BWM OF TiOrrenak LOmEANID ROME FILBCHONE ANG MORONS AN nen wan ran 1U Ce Ono 10 CoRa NG ce ind HONE ACRE FOF KUEN DUTDORE 1 HeOUm RO! OF DW An BDOMDONAI eR eaneed HONOR EONAR, DUve! Hus prey IC OUverS OCCUDENCY 2! VLE DOA I ering 10 DE me! BUCH MOOD LAL OO NET Mee Uhie ADENe LLAMA Hs LO CIRC UMMERR BUTE TEGO RUC DEIRCTD Taran MeL lene BuTeT ENN OF OFT ES CAULE Wem 80 De maoe ANG ENA One A 16 = reer OCU dare Weieel Dee) AHA TIME BL MO OEE MOF IFUONRD | TERI OF /emacamners aCe FROWN AG IO COMO mun Inn Sianaarg Dever enae oars wo DOH OF ME DLACY an BHAA! OIDYWORE FF BIAOLANN ALVID Senet @ NOt HOARD FO mune MeOREY OF Fe CecaTERNT 0! A CONTOIE ASILIO UrW@at Cau nen DY # OME! Drom nCewOn Te BROTH OF WARD TF EROFRON AIVID! Burret OF DOMe INAe OHRCT IC Ler Buc Raven names mm min wane ney Career eee Lars tee eee naan RRR LOKI wlniUmD boron ase suDwect to ne woreoone Ur me OR neat OF Metin cio Some eentiee 1 CONSE IME ORNRET BNO 10 COMING [Ne COL Varro! BNA OF DANO ID wECTOW 4: COIN 2mm MW ceuaae GIDE FIORE RE IC! MEDECHORE ASUONNG © wOR-=ROVEN ONO! 16 DONNE 10 ene IAL ay AEM OF FRFKONa! crDDeAG aie On Ine Hess FioDETY 4G TeQue 80 ROLL B50 1 DAG TONLE Rove Oe err MRE RTO IAI Ie FP rOOR MY ORUONG DUI OL ATMED WG INE Len RMI UOOETY ANC PKI W AMY Ray Ler maw uaeneD a Fre COMO” 12 OF IN EP RCo wad OFOWNOTY weal BNO tear @ncmened P ORISA OF CDSS. | Ine PrODeRy 4 Gamome BY Ie 6 INO! CAAuaMTY O8IE# LOLNO ANG GOs) OF FesOrMION COWS RO: BACeed J". DI VWe Abba neeO vemutveon a! Ine FrpORrY $0 Bama ced car FADILIDHON LDH BE-0F DONORNON 01 Ine Semel AND CIMUNG Kas OF OCEEC Our bab hl LC INE BAS OF INI COAITAT win Healan aon COSI Fm 1OmeY @! wiGhwid 1! We GDN OF Ve Ny A Jooer rer wiih @aret the J OF Are MRUIARCE DIOCHROS TeeOt Ue EIN 1 MepBmO VaNUEIEOn DL ING ETON BO RAMOS DUYe Bhan have we COUION OI erin aan FEDe TY as Asaoe Or HNUE OKC HORE 8 Bamaoe OF OF CARCMENO my Contec ano ImUemAe rena) OF Det: PROCEEDS OF SALE. CLOSING PROCEDURE, Ihe aeed Bras OF frcmrDed YOO CE AAC® OF UAE | ADSUAC! O' HE Ras Deen Luin D seoence 0: Une Bras Ge GONZO 3 T CIOWALE IC \NOw He 1 DUVEL, RING ADE ROUNOLENEDS DF CRANGE ENC Sind LeNOe DemEr IKE UNMArReLabre Om IN8 Oai# 0! Ie Weel ermnerce F1DCmmOR OF (Te Mele W/Se' se Nee 0 necrOe OF Deeb aOMeY OF Dy BRON TMRREY BCKMONDN BAO™ ONT ID! b DENOD OF NO! Mare INAS Cars ane COHNO Gale 1H Denar wie HL TEnomeTD UTERO OE ci QUGA NC aun © DAO! BUNA! ERUS, Wulren Lp Shey OwiHOD HOWE Sere Fe NG OF (Pew Oates ates Srwiiml pine teva ay Gays HO Gate UF TaN en OF LUET MOM UAN M) caste HM OFNEC) Seer tanh 1O MEMES CUTE IN) G8leC) Bb GROOEAIET ENE OUND TUNG MAL LOOT wnnen DEMENS DY DUYe! BOG wren S Gark ANH O¥MAIAL be Stat iue 1G Barrer BO perTesmarienarey Oi v0 SUR THOMAS NEM. DUEL ATEE FBIUEn D8 FeesOra! FTOORMY veLawe Ine ROM TICORTY BAD eCUreY Ine RIODERY 16 Dene! Gr RontcAe warranty C640 41 tnr ui kaw 1! boven b Ge brenaiWe We Dur De mia OF metiennen Corneneo ete WETIANG 10 8UNE Cues LAN ARE Uiet AS ab Ram On DOLL BOMINE! Deum! OL (0 BMY MiBerermng DEIEC ENERO! At Mm we peed 0 CD $84 8 DOMION OF INO OUICRAbA DICE RIC De Demo NOM FLUO! HABACING OF IRHNENENE Trou emmy OF Ie IRNERRG MANION AL 10 Ovace eB! OBE BIS Teme O LO! ONE 8A 10! CLO UTRMEIE 0! TIOTOL OF DFC POOR ANAE EDN OVE! CONUD RY OFOMMON FINI CONIA Sauer enibn hay ihe HOA! ID HpQMAre HDT Free mnenne mninul ¢ cen COMM men: at 1 ele AO! HINO CROUREMEN DO -TONDEGS OFICREOL HL 1b OF Any Une OMlecl BfumArENe IC Dure -mOnQApO! 1TH eRCIO~m BNO COMM OVC FOUrE Fe Om ww WDA NORE ire ad ere) Ie BORN Hines MOVE ME ARETE Ouran! SeCUON OPT THAT 65 1889: as amences LE DR DM Ae eee weet ASEEL L HEC RRMNO IUNOD ROVImIR R HUIEIIOD ANC AOIEES Cy RICESLANCE Go Ime IC Er EGEE INA ICM ONY MND kame wy NETO BMG MUR IS Duar ee aN te pi ange 6 met TRIS IM AR RRR nee FR OFT U Filiye gor BO EERE YET ewe IUTM EEE 1 tnapT BE IG ROENN Gewee cpu ew vee oe EO e Heth totemcame: prnee umpnetrtie ab ATE GTI OE DAW) OF AMM May OF LOL were nin Hee Carte bite GGUS CGM Rawr NiMOE ION DF IM OMNIA WDE flee eA ORMRIEO OY EK I Bunions nee ah vee CERT BEEE OSLER ACHOF a: RALMMY OF Ine DANO: AGERE Shae LUN LermaIe EEO! IC INE waIen! O FRAUEN a Mig Oh dba Ae meee © praec ee abe comow een promwons © Chane ah 1 8E2. as amienomc Ans tu Germeen Our ANC DONE! mor Cote: Ae we. nO! Un malne FAD AMER: Re ROR! ORR AE Bun etre ROBT ROTC RGE Ret RUE ENE Coe MADE ROmnmENe! mune ree son! LTE DR (8 NOT ERC Ou. 0 INS BxCIOW FO TUNE OF mU mae ENC CLAIRE ONC amarmeD AY CUNT TSI THEO! OF S Lee DEED: OFM ER A I OUR: O DEFOE OF HEME LYON OIE IM De Une th bead MOR MERA wut 1G monte < nn Un rerun © RFT! FRTTD ENE COLES DD ETE are aime ae RTO Liner eo emu me miner ROR wntR uy BNE GSS : anon mia HEINE OWS ee etm ee anean ane CORERED wa CE BSG CERO INL COTTE Re nnn me pear RE ORS yon CASTER Ee GRDTIN YF OP DON DLE Gr Duvet ANE DEDOSNT setae tet Tee ke nee Go 18 we RE aN I ie wana oan Cages LON © Denn OS BOF MO LO te Care eA IE BT Cee tae 0 fe OCR ORMOME UNO Cua 6 fa a SRE ECONO Tae GHG Bi mE TE ROTEL Dem ARIL UNO IS ow Se teaser one nae PS le are ae bere matin Cem ormarne wvie © Show iG mane bese’ y le Mee oe ene cere weak Fee eae TATHECT SDT EPID ED ARLE FERED AS BOUND NT ponies re eB A Ke tne Guver 275 Ww vw — 2, = so =_ “hoe Pye 2 nag eee ok) ae FRC ee ae Cet mee! ~ - 15 2 " ¢ * y f ' NN Zed eepa Secure whe ~ bat st [end Been Abhiae DEL 4 ~ S Lid Setoete te) fawe2 T: Ae. a / y a / Coven Larre’ ot te oat eT es , y po _ J wt Oey wees Oe Fn OL ee (eee Se et iD 0 TE 9) "oy . : a ~ /=- On RESTS —— Aa ee renee a pe a ae a “NO, ‘ ald a = uy ' fal wd. een fie - - Buyer ~. ; . a Toner SiG GROUP. INC. Ter SMeENT LLINGSWo aarm os eA, 2 RPLTONA, FLCRIDA, POLICY #620-65- LVALUATICH TOSTELLO RESIDENCE, 2558 \ o7 cause(s) wrmarcices Summeatic e visuel inspectic wee eer te en Le dined ep bb ok me SETTLEMENT CLAIM EVALUATION COSTEZLO RESIDENCES 2SES COLLINGSWOOD CRIVE DELTONA, FLO (PN ¢3-: 2. me aaa enn i ieee ier eee i on eet cee iam tae ia tere een Lae ee ee pet ae aes email 1 PETITIONER'S ' EXHIBIT CxrSw was shallow Lavestigation boxricgs to i i } cp. Mm ra iu mere G ny tu (} is between circumstances, recha subsoils th Nd 0) a ae) is} is -'U Woy J 0 40 20 W'u § tt is) Hof at ct gt Mus. vw Ww yr

Docket for Case No: 03-001100PL