Petitioner: AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
Respondent: ST. CATHERINE`S T.L.C., INC.
Judges: JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Agency: Agency for Health Care Administration
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Jun. 17, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Thursday, July 17, 2003.
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2025
SB'd
TATE OF FLORIDA
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE
ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner, AHCA No.: 2003002988
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
v. Airbill No.: 1496719943
Airbill No.: 1496719840
ST. CATHERINE’S T.L.C., INC.,
0D- D347
Respondent.
/
an
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
COMES NOW the Agency for Health Care Administration
(the “Agency” or “AHCA”), by and through the undersigned
counsel, and files this administrative complaint against
Catherine Blackwood, individually and St. Catherine’s
T.L.c., Inc., (hereinafter “St. Catherine T.L.C.” or
“Respondent”), pursuant to Chapter 400, Part iI, andl
Section 120.60, Florida Statutes (“Fla. Stat.”), (2002),
and alleges:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
1. This is an action to impose an administrative
fine of $157,000.00 ($1,000 per day from December 1, 2002
to May 6, 2003) plus $1,000.00 per day thereafter until the
time respondent ‘ceases operation of an assisted living
facility, pursuant to Section 400.419(6), Fla. Stat.
ANBWLd¥dad W937 YOHY BE:68 £@B~C-ET-\0N
(2002), for the protection of the public health, safety and
welfare.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections
120.569 and 120.57 Fla. Stat., Chapter 28-106, Florida
Administrative Code.
3. Venue lies in Broward County, pursuant to Section
120,57 Fla. Stat, and Rule 28-106.207, Florida
Administrative Code.
PARTIES
4. AHCA is the regulatory authority responsible for
licensure and enforcement of all applicable statutes and
rules governing adult living facilities, pursuant to
Chapter 400, Part III, Florida Statutes (2002), and Chapter
58A-S Florida Administrative Code.
5. St. Catherine’s T.L.C. Inc., was previously
licensed tc operate a licensed Assisted Living Facility at
9990 NW 41°* Street, Cooper City, Florida 33024.
COUNT I
ST. CATHERINE’S T.L.C., OPERATES AN ASSISTED LIVING
FACILITY WITHOUT A LICENSE AS REQUIRED BY STATUTE.
SECTIONS 400.408(1) (a), 400.414(1) (m), and 400.419(6),
FLORIDA STATUTES
iNaWlesédad TWIS7 BOHY BE:6B EBVC-ET-Ab
aQ'd
6. AHCA re-alleges and incorporates paragraphs one
(Ll) through five (5) as if fully set forth herein.
7. Section 400.419(6), Fla. Stat., provides that any
unlicensed facility that continues to operate after agency
notification is subject to a $1,000 fine per day.
8. Since or about December 1, 2002, St. Catherine’s
T.L.Cc., Inc., has knowingly operated an assisted living
facility without the benefit of obtaining a license as
required by law. The facts upon which this Administrative
Complaint is based are as follows:
9. On May 17, 2002, the Agency issued a Notice of
Intent to Deny letter, denying Respondent’s application for
license renewal. Respondent requested a hearing, which was
denied by Final Order Denying Request for Hearing dated
October 11, 2002 (an amended final order was entered on
January 30, 2003 to correct a scrivener’s error). The
Final Order Denying Request for Hearing was served on
Respondent on November 7, 2002 and the residents residing
at Respondent’ s assisted living facility were relocated.
10. On or about December 1, 2003, Respondent resumed
operation of an assisted living facility without the
penefit of obtaining a license. The operation of an
unlicensed assisted living facility adversely affects ard
poses a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the
3
LNANLdébdSd W957 YOHs BE:60 LBe-3T--A0l
residents.
11. The Agency and Respondent are presently involved
in Injunctive Proceedings before the 17*" Judicial Circuit
for Broward County (Circuit Case No. 02-020769(11)),
wherein the Agency has petitioned the Court to enjoin
Respondent from operating an illegal assisted living
facility in Broward County. The Case is presently set for
Trial on the four-week period of June 23, 2003.
12. Respondent has erroneously contended in the
Injunction Proceedings that the Circuit Court should stay
the Injunctive Proceedings pending resolution of an appeal
before the 4‘* ‘District Court of Appeal, which will
determine whether Respondent was entitled to a hearing
prior to the license denial by the Agency. Only the Agency
or the 4%? District Court of Appeal can grant a Stay to the
administrative proceedings denying Respondent’s license to
operate an assisted living facility. To date, Respondent
has not obtained a Stay of the administrative proceedings
denying her license renewal. As such, Respondent is not
authorized to operate an assisted living facility in the
State of Florida.
13. The Agency, in its continuous efforts to end
Respondent’s illegal operation of an assisted living
facility served Respondent with a Notice of Violation
8@"d INAMWLasd3d (WIST YoHe BE:68 fBBZ-5T-AW
letter on or about February 5, 2001. The letter notified
Respondent that the Agency considered her to be operating
an assisted living facility in violation of Section
400.408(1) (a), Fla. Stat-, which provides that it is
unlawful to operate or maintain an unlicensed living
facility without obtaining a valid license from the Agency.
14. Respondent responded to the Agency’s Notice of
Violation letter with a letter from her counsel dated
February 6, 2003 denying that Respondent was operating as
an assisted living facility without a license. However,
un pleadings in the Injunction case pending before the
Circuit Court, Respondent at no time denies that her
license renewal has been denied by the Agency.
15. In its latest pleadings, on a Motion for
Continuance filed on or about April 10, 2003, the
Respondent states in paragraph 4 that the issue concerning
whether the Agency “..acted properly in failing to renew the
Defendant’s (Respondent) license to operate an assisted
living facility is presently on appeal before the Fourth
District Court of Appeal..” Additionally, Respondent argues
in paragraph 6 that should the Broward Circuit Court grant
an Injunction prohibiting the operation of the assisted
living facility and subsequently the Fourth District Court
of Appeal rules favorably for Respondent the damage for
60"d ANSWleddad WIS BOHe BE:68 £BGE-ST-ABW
QT"
Respondent “would be done”. The fact Respondent argues she
would suffer damages if she were enjoined from operating an
assisted living facility implies that she is in fact,
operating without a license.
16. Despite every effort by the Agency, Respondent
continues to operate an assisted living facility without a
license.
17. Based on the forgoing facts, St. Catherine T.L.C.,
Inc., violated Sections 400.408(1) (a), Florida Statutes
which warrants a fine of $157,000.00 ($1,000.00 per day
from December 1, ‘2002 to May 6, 2003) plus $1,000.00 per
day thereafter until the time respondent ceases operation
of an assisted living facility, pursuant to sections
400.414(1) (m), and 400.419(6), Florida Statutes.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Agency xequests the Court to order the
following relief:
1. Enter a judgment in favor of the Agency for
Health Care Administration against St. Catherine T.L.C.,
Ine. on Count I.
2. Assess an administrative fine of $157,000.00 plus
$1,000.00 per day until operation of the assisted living
ANAWLYedad TWIST YOHY SF:68 e@e-51T-.0H
TT"
facility ceases, against St. Catherine’s T.L.C., Inc., for
violation of Sections 400.408(1){a), 400.414(1) (m), and
400.419(6), Florida Statutes.
3. Assess costs related to the investigation and
prosecution of this matter.
4. Grant such other relief as this Court deems is
just and proper.
Respondent is notified that it has a right to request an
administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and
120.57, Florida Statutes (2002). Specific options for
administrative ection are set out in the attached Election
of Rights and explained in the attached Explanation of
Rights. All requests for hearing shall be made to the
Agency for Health Care Administration, and delivered to the
Agency Clerk, Agency for Health Care Administration,
Manchester Building, 2727 Mahan Drive, MS #3, Tallahassee,
Florida 32308.
RESPONDENT IS FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO RECEIVE
A REQUEST FOR A HEARING WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF THIS COMPLAINT WILL RESULT IN AN ADMISSION OF
THE FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT AND THE ENTRY OF A FINAL
ORDER BY THE AGENCY.
ANSWLabd3ad T9S7 BIHY BE:6B8 LB@e-G1-AUW
_ 4)
Alba M. Rodriguez
Assistant General Counsel
Agency for Health Care
Administration
8355 N. W. 53 Street
Miami, Florida 33166
Copies furnished to:
Diane Reiland
Filed Office Manager
Agency for Health Care Administration
1710 E.- Tiffany Drive - Suite 100
West Palm Beach, Florida 33407
(U.S. Mail)
Jean Lombardi
Finance and Accounting
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
Assisted Living Facility Program Unit
Agency for Health Care Administration
2727 Mahan Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32308
(Interoffice Mail)
LNAWLagd3d THIS YOHE B£:68 FBBZ-ET—A0H
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the
foregoing has been furnished by overnight mail to St.
Catherine’s T.L.C., Inc., 9990 N. W. 42 Street, Cooper
City, Florida 33024; Catherine Blackwood, 2611 N. W. 115
Terrance, Coral Springs, Florida 33065 on this Ping day of
Qpten TH: Radars
Alba M. Rodriguez Ay
May, 2003.
INAWLasd3d TWIST YSHY 6£:68 f@bic-ET-Adb!
Docket for Case No: 03-002247
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 13, 2003 |
Final Order filed.
|
Jul. 17, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jul. 16, 2003 |
Agreed Motion to Close File (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 10, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Jul. 10, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (video hearing set for August 22, 2003; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale and Tallahassee, FL).
|
Jul. 08, 2003 |
Response to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jul. 01, 2003 |
Order Enlarging Time to File Response to Initial Order. (the parties shall have until July 8, 2003, to file a response to the initial order)
|
Jun. 30, 2003 |
Out of Time Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Order (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
|
Jun. 18, 2003 |
Initial Order.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Amended Request for Hearing filed.
|
Jun. 17, 2003 |
Notice (of Agency referral) filed.
|