Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
Respondent: HOWARD DAVIS
Judges: LARRY J. SARTIN
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Sep. 22, 2003
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, October 8, 2003.
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2024
[jp BSP
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD
DIVISION I &
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
Petitioner,
Case No. 2001-05288
VS.
HOWARD DAVIS,
Respondent. ~
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
("Petitioner"), files this Administrative Complaint before the Construction Industry Licensing
Board, against HOWARD DAVIS, ("Respondent"), and says:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating the practice of contracting
pursuant to Section 20.165, Florida Statutes, and Chapters 455 and 489, Florida Statutes.
2. Respondent is, and has been at all times material hereto, a Certified General
Contractor and a Certified Roofing Contractor, in the State of Florida, having been issued license
numbers CG C020480 and CC C039797.
3. Respondent's last known address is 783 NW. 78™ Street, Miami, Florida 33150,
4. At all times material hereto, Respondent with his general contract ing: license, was
the qualifying agent for Davis & Palmer Construction, Inc., and with bis roofing contractor
license, the Respondent was authorized to engage in contracting as an individual.
5. Section 489.1195(1)(a), Florida Statutes, provides that all primary qualifying
_ agents for a business organization are jointly and equally responsible for supervision of all
operations of the business organization; for all field work at all sites; and for financial matters,
both for the organization in general and for each specific job.
COUNT I
6. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five as though fully set forth in this Count I.
7. _ At all times material hereto, neither Johnnie Stroy, Jr., nor J. Stroy & Associates
was properly registered, certified, qualified, or otherwise licensed to engage in the practice of
contracting in the State of Florida, and neither of those names appeared on the Respondent’s
license.
8. On or about November 2, 1999, Johnnie Stroy, Jr., doing business as J. Stroy &
Associates, (“Stroy”) contracted with Cortel Owens (“Owens”) to remodel a carport into a
garage and construct an addition at Owens’ residence at 6008 NW 24” Avenue, Miami, Florida
for Sixteen Thousand, Six Hundred Eighty Eight dollars ($16,688.00). Pursuant to a change order
dated on or about March 6, 2000, there was added to the scope of work the installation of egress
windows, new finish concrete for the driveway, and a retaining wall. This increasec: the price by
Eight Thousand, Two Hundred dollars ($8,200.00) to Twenty Four Thousand, Eight Hundred
Eighty Hight dollars ($24,888.00).
9. Owens paid Stroy Seventeen Thousand, Five Hundred Thirty Six dollars
(317,536.00) toward the contract.
10. The Respondent applied for and obtained, or allowed his certified general
contractor license number to be used by or for the benefit of Stroy to apply for and obtain, from
Miami-Dade County building permit number 2000050368, issued on or about March 10, 2000 for
work on Owens’ construction project.
11. Onor about August 2000 Stroy abandoned the project.
12. On or about October 2000 the Respondent agreed verbally with Owens to
complete the project.
13. Owens paid the Respondent Two Thousand, Eight Hundred Forty One dollars
($2,841.00).
14. The Respondent performed or substantially performed the remaining work and
obtained a passing final inspection on or about October 11, 2001.
15, At all times material, the Respondent knew or had reasonable grounds to know
that Stroy was not registered, certified or qualified to engage in the practice of contracting in the
,
State of Florida.
i6. At all times material, until approximately October 2000, there was no contract
between Owens and either the Respondent or Davis & Palmer Construction, Inc.
17. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(4), Florida
Statutes (1999), by performing any act which assists a person or entity in engaging in the
prohibited uncertified and unregistered practice of contracting, if the certificateholder or registrant
knows or has reasonable grounds to know that the person or entity was uncertified and
unregistered.
COUNT
18. Petitioner realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs one
through five and seven through sixteen as though fully set forth in this Count IL.
19. Section 489.127(4)(b) and (c), Florida Statutes (1999), provides in pertinent part
as follows:
(b) A certified or registered contractor, or contractor
authorized by a local construction regulation board to do
contracting, may not knowingly allow his or her certification
number or registration number to be used by a person who is not
certified or registered as provided for in this chapter, or used by a
business organization that is not qualified as provided for in this
chapter to engage in the business, or act in the capacity of, a
contractor.
(c) Acertified or registered contractor, or contractor
authorized by a Jocal construction regulation board to do
contracting, may not apply for or obtain a building permit for
construction work unless the certified or registered contractor, or
contractor authorized by a local construction regulation board to do
contracting, or business organization duly qualified by said
contractor, has entered into a contract to make improvements to, or
periorm the contracting at, the real property specified in the
application or permit.
20. Based upon the foregoing, the Respondent violated Section 489.129(1)(), Florida
Statutes (1999), by failing in material respect to comply with the provisions of this part or
violating a rule or lawful of the board.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Construction Industry Licensing
Board enter an Order imposing one or more of the following penalties: place on probation,
réprimand the licensee, revoke, suspend, deny the issuance or renewal of the certificate or
registration, require financial restitution to a consumer, impose an administrative fine not to
4
exceed $5,000 per violation, require continuing education, assess costs associated with
investigation and prosecution, impose any or all penalties delineated within Section 455.227(2),
Florida Statutes, and/or any other relief that the Board is authorized to impose pursuant to
Chapters 489, 455, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules promulgated thereunder.
Signed this qh day of C , 2002,
E <=
PATRICK CREEHAN
CHIEF CONSTRUCTION ATTORNEY
COUNSEL FOR DEPARTMENT: peparent of usiness and Professional Regulation
C . DEPUTY CLERK
Theodore R. Gay 6G -
Assistant General Counsel ot | iy Suidelt
Department of Business and eax tnandn ‘
Professional Regulation ou g YEN -2002
401 NW 2 Avenue #N607 DATE —
Miami, FL 33128
(305) 377-7115
TRGIsb
6/28/02
Case #2001-05288
° PCP: August 27, 2002
Division I: Karcher/Husband
Division I: Brown/Falkner
Docket for Case No: 03-003355PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 08, 2003 |
Order Closing File. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 07, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Cancel Hearing and Close File (with exhibits) filed via facsimile.
|
Oct. 07, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Motion to Cancel Hearing and Close File (filed via facsimile).
|
Oct. 02, 2003 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Oct. 02, 2003 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 29, 2003; 9:30 a.m.; Miami, FL).
|
Oct. 01, 2003 |
Petitioner`s Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
|
Sep. 22, 2003 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Sep. 22, 2003 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Sep. 22, 2003 |
Agency referral filed.
|
Sep. 22, 2003 |
Initial Order.
|