Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING vs KIMBERLY A. HUDSON, 05-000601PL (2005)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 05-000601PL Visitors: 29
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
Respondent: KIMBERLY A. HUDSON
Judges: DANIEL MANRY
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: St. Petersburg, Florida
Filed: Feb. 22, 2005
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, June 29, 2005.

Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2019
Summary: The issue for determination is whether Petitioner should discipline Respondent's pari-mutuel wagering occupational license for allegedly preventing authorized personnel from taking a urine sample from a greyhound after a race in violation of Florida Administrative Code Rule 61D-6.005(9).Petitioner should impose a $1,000 fine on Respondent who effectively interferred with the collection of urine samples from a winning greyhound by insisting on the presence of two dogs in the detention area.
AGC - Filing For: PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING - 10/14/2005 - 2005-05801 - 2004040639 - HUDSON,KIMBERLY A - CONSENT ORDER

Final Order No. BPR-2005-05801 Date: fO JLl

FILED • 7-05

Department of Business and Professio al Regulation

I AGENCY CLERK

v m"1li,;U_

STATE OF FLORIDA.. -

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING


DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING


Petitioner,

vs. DBPR Case No. 2004040639


KIMBERLY A. HUDSON,


Respondent.

I


CONSENT ORDER


The State of Florida, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (Division) and Kimberly A. Hudson (Respondent) hereby stipulate and agree to the following terms and issuance of this Consent Order.

  1. At all times material hereto, Respondent held a pan-mutuel wagering occupational license, number 467790-1021, issued by the Division.

  2. An Administrative Complamt was issued agamst Respondent in DBPR Case No. 2004040639 alleging that Respondent v10lated rule 61D-6.005(9), Florida Administrative Code.

  3. The Administrative Complaint alleged that the Respondent interfered with the taking of a urine sample as authorized by Chapter 550, Florida Statutes, on August 04, 2004.


Filed November 7, 2019 11:16 AM Division of Administrative Hearings

STIPULATION


WHEREAS, the parties desire to resolve this matter, the following terms are stipulated:

  1. The Division has jurisdiction over this matter and the parties.


  2. The Divis10n is authorized by section 120.57, Florida Statutes, to resolve administrative proceedings by Consent Order.

  3. Each party has entered into the terms of this Consent Order voluntarily.


    The Respondent is aware that he is entitled to the advice of counsel. The Respondent has either sought the advice of counsel or by execution of this Consent Order is knowingly waiving the opportunity to seek advice of counsel. The Respondent acknowledges that the Division has not made any promise nor has it in any other way encouraged the Respondent to enter into this Consent Order without the advice of counsel.

  4. This Consent Order is enforceable under section 120.69, Florida Statutes, and chapter 550, Florida Statutes, as final agency act10n.

  5. Each party shall bear its own costs and legal fees related to this matter, and no financial claim shall be made against the Division in this action.

  6. Respondent and the Division acknowledge and agree that this Consent Order and contained stipulation constitute the Final Order of the Division respectmg the matter set forth above and that further administrative and judicial review is hereby waived by both parties.

  7. Respondent neither admits nor denies a v10lation of rule 61D-6.005(9), Florida Administrative Code, as set forth in the allegations contained in the Administrative Complamt and in DBPR Case No. 2004040639.

  8. Respondent shall pay fees in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00).


    The Division's adoption of this Consent Order constitutes acknowledgment ofreceipt of payment of the fees.

  9. It is expressly understood that this Stipulation is subject to the approval of the Director of the Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (Director). ill this regard, the Stipulation shall have no force and effect unless this Consent Order incorporating the terms

    of this Stipulation, is signed by both parties. Should this Consent Order.be rejected, no statement made in furtherance of a stipulation by the Respondent may be used as direct evidence against the Respondent in any proceeding. However, such statements may be used by the Petitioner for impeachment purposes.

  10. Respondent and the Department fully understand that this Consent Order will in no way preclude additional proceedings by the Division against the Respondent for acts or omissions not specifically set forth in the Administrative Complaint for DBPR Case No. 2004040639. However, this Consent Order completely resolves the issues set forth in the aforementioned Administrative Complaint for DBPR Case No. 2004040639.

  11. Upon the Division's adoption of this Consent Order, Respondent expressly waives all further procedural steps, and expressly waives all rights to seek judicial review of this Consent Order. Upon the Division's adoption ofth1s Consent Order, Respondent waives the nght to seek any attorney's. fees or costs from the Department in connection with this disciplinary proceedmg.

  12. This Consent Order is executed by the Respondent for the purpose of avoiding further administrative action with respect to this cause. ill this regard, Respondent authorizes the Director to review and examine all investigative file materials concerning

    Respondent prior to or in conjunction with consideration of the Stipulation. Should tlns joint Stipulation not be accepted by the Director, it is agreed that presentation to and consideration of this Consent Order and other documents and matters by the Director shall not unfairly or illegally prejudice the Director from further participation, consideration or resolution of these proceedings.


    RESPONDENT, KIMBERLY A. HUDSON, hereby agrees d consents to the

    • 11fit:.

terms and conditions of this Consent Order this day of-+---,IV- I-=--''------


2005.


STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF LJtK/:.-!.r' _


Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this ¥(/.ay of

/kffut,; , 2005 by Kimberly A. Hudson, who is personally known to me or

as identification.

f(

APPROVED this {J yay of (k /afe. , 2005.


Jose M. Helton, Jr. ef Attorney

ivision of Pari-Mutuel Wagering Florida Bar Number: 879622 Department of Business and Professional Regulation Northwood Centre

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-2202



ORDER


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:


The foregoing paragraphs one (1) through thirteen (13) of the Stipulation shall

constitute the agreed resolution of this matter and the Final Order of the Division in Case Numbers 2004040639 once 1t 1s filed with the Agency Clerk.

DONE AND ORDERED this /f Vaay of (),TWf2 2005, in Tallahassee, Florida.


David J. Robe s, irector Division of P ri-Mutuel Wagering Northwood Centre

1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1035

(850) 488-9130

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Qc...±ob

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing CONSENT ORDER has been furnished by U.S. Mail to Kimberly A. Hudson, 5622 Tangerine Ave.,

South, Gulfport, FL 33711, this /4 ay of ec '2005.


Sarah Wachman, Agency Clerk


Copies furnished to:


Office of Operations Licensing Section Section of Investigations


S. Thomas Peavey Hoffer, Assistant General Counsel


General Manager, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club Chief Inspector, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club Judges/Stewards, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club Director of Security, Sanford-Orlando Kennel Club


Nat10nal Greyhound Association

P.O. Box 543 Abilene, KS 67410


Florida Kennels, Inc. 7218 West 4th Avenue Hialeah, FL 33014


Docket for Case No: 05-000601PL
Issue Date Proceedings
Nov. 07, 2019 Agency Final Order filed.
Jun. 29, 2005 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jun. 29, 2005 Recommended Order (hearing held May 19, 2005). CASE CLOSED.
Jun. 15, 2005 (Petitioner`s) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 13, 2005 Petitioner`s Motion to Strike filed.
Jun. 06, 2005 Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Jun. 06, 2005 Notice of Filing (Transcript of Proceedings) filed.
May 25, 2005 Letter to Judge Manry from R. Connell on behalf of Respondent to inform the Judge of the concerns in the matter filed.
May 19, 2005 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of K. Hudson filed.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of R. Connell filed.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of C. Marriott filed.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of C. Marriott filed.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of R. Connell filed.
May 18, 2005 Notice of Filing filed.
May 18, 2005 Deposition of K.Hudson filed.
May 04, 2005 Notice of Taking Deposition (K. Hudson) filed.
May 04, 2005 Amended Notice of Witness List filed.
May 04, 2005 Notice of Taking Deposition (C. Marriott) filed.
May 04, 2005 Notice of Taking Deposition (R. Connell) filed.
Apr. 26, 2005 Notice of Filing (answers to Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions) filed.
Apr. 26, 2005 (Answers to) Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
Apr. 26, 2005 Amended Notice of Witness List filed.
Apr. 14, 2005 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing (hearing set for May 19, 2005; 10:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
Apr. 14, 2005 Unopposed Motion for Continuance of Formal Hearing filed.
Apr. 13, 2005 Notice of Witness List filed.
Mar. 09, 2005 Petitioner`s First Request for Admissions filed.
Mar. 02, 2005 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Mar. 02, 2005 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 25, 2005; 10:00 a.m.; St. Petersburg, FL).
Mar. 01, 2005 Petitioner, Department of Business and Professional Regulation Response to Initial Order filed.
Feb. 22, 2005 Initial Order.
Feb. 22, 2005 Election of Rights filed.
Feb. 22, 2005 Administrative Complaint filed.
Feb. 22, 2005 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 05-000601PL
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 14, 2005 Agency Final Order
Jun. 29, 2005 Recommended Order Petitioner should impose a $1,000 fine on Respondent who effectively interferred with the collection of urine samples from a winning greyhound by insisting on the presence of two dogs in the detention area.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer