STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
MOTO DEALER IMPORT, LLC AND BIG | ) | |||
BOYS TOYS FLORIDA, LLC, | ) ) | |||
Petitioners, | ) | |||
) | ||||
vs. | ) | Case | No. | 08-4547 |
) | ||||
MOTO IMPORT DISTRIBUTORS, INC., | ) | |||
) | ||||
Respondent. | ) | |||
| ) |
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to Notice, this cause came on for formal hearing before Diane Cleavinger, duly-designated Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings on April 1, 2009, in Panama City, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: No appearance For Respondent: Wayne Wooten
Moto Imports Distributors, LLC
12202 Hutchinson Boulevard, Suite 72 Panama City Beach, Florida 32407
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue in this cause is whether Petitioners are entitled to a motor vehicle dealership that is proposed to be located in Panama City Beach, Florida.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On August 22, 2008, Moto Dealer Import, LLC, and Big Boy Toys Florida, LLC (Petitioners) published a Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer in a County of Less than 300,000 Population in the Florida Administrative Weekly. The proposed dealership was to be located in Panama City Beach, Florida. On September 7, 2008, Moto Import Distributors, LLC (Respondent) filed a Petition of Complaint in letter form, protesting the establishment of the franchise at its proposed location. The case was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings to conduct the final hearing in this matter.
This cause came on for hearing as noticed. After waiting more than 15 minutes, Petitioners failed to appear to prosecute their claim. Respondent, likewise, did not appear.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On November 4, 2008, a Notice of Hearing setting the date, time and location of final hearing was issued in this case. The Notice of Hearing was mailed to the last known, valid addresses of the Petitioners, which were also the addresses provided in Petitioners' Notice of Publication. Neither Notice of Hearing was returned.
This cause came on for hearing as noticed. After waiting more than 15 minutes, Petitioners failed to appear to
prosecute their claim. There has been no communication from the Petitioners, before, during, or since the hearing to indicate that they would not be attending the final hearing.
Because of Petitioners' failure to appear, there was no evidence to demonstrate that Petitioners are entitled to a franchise motor vehicle dealership in Panama City Beach, Florida. Absent such evidence, the establishment of the proposed dealership should be denied.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and the subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat. (2008).
The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) is the agency responsible for regulating the licensing and franchising of motor vehicles dealers. §§ 320.60- 320.70, Fla. Stat. (2008).
Section 320.642(1), Florida Statutes, requires a motor vehicle dealer who proposes to establish an additional motor vehicle dealership within an area already represented by the same line-make vehicle to give written notice to the Department of its intent to establish a new franchise. The statute also provides that any affected dealership may protest the establishment of a new franchise in its territory.
Section 320.642(2), Florida Statutes, establishes the standards of review to determine if establishment of a new, competing motor vehicle franchise should be granted. Section 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes, states in relevant part:
An application for a motor vehicle dealer license in any community or territory shall be denied when:
* * *
2. The licensee fails to show that the existing franchise dealer . . . are not providing adequate representation of such line-make motor vehicles in such . . . territory. The burden of proof in establishing inadequate representation shall be on the licensee. (emphasis supplied)
In this case, Petitioners, as the licensees, failed to appear at the hearing after proper Notice of the hearing was issued. Because Petitioners failed to appear, no evidence that Respondent was not adequately representing the territory in which the proposed dealership intends to locate was presented. Absent such evidence, Petitioners have not carried their burden of proof in this matter and the establishment of the proposed franchise should be denied.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles denying the establishment of Petitioners' proposed franchise.
DONE AND ENTERED this 15th day of April, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
DIANE CLEAVINGER
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 15th day of April, 2009.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Jack Lin
Moto Dealer Import, LLC
4998-B South Royal Atlanta Drive Tucker, Georgia 30084
Wayne Wooten
Moto Import Distributors, LLC
12202 Hutchison Boulevard, Suite 72 Panama City Beach, Florida 32407
Rap Peavy
Big Boys Toys Florida, LLC 1312 Thomas Drive
Panama City Beach, Florida 32408
Michael J. Alderman, Esquire Department of Highway Safety
and Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-432 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0635
Robin Lotane, General Counsel Department of Highway Safety
and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
Carl A. Ford, Director Division of Motor Vehicles Department of Highway Safety
and Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building, Room B-439 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jun. 02, 2009 | Final Order filed. |
Apr. 15, 2009 | Recommended Order (hearing held April 1, 2009). CASE CLOSED. |
Apr. 15, 2009 | Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency. |
Apr. 01, 2009 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Nov. 04, 2008 | Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 1, 2009; 10:00 a.m., Central Time; Panama City, FL). |
Sep. 17, 2008 | Initial Order. |
Sep. 17, 2008 | Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed. |
Sep. 17, 2008 | Protest of Intent to Establish a New Dealership filed. |
Sep. 17, 2008 | Agency referral filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
May 27, 2009 | Agency Final Order | |
Apr. 15, 2009 | Recommended Order | Petitioner did not appear at the hearing and there was no evidence to establish entitlement to a franchise. |