Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ZONGSHEN, INC., AND BIKER-BARN SOURCE SALES, INC. vs ACTION MOTORSPORTS, INC., 09-001106 (2009)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 09-001106 Visitors: 39
Petitioner: ZONGSHEN, INC., AND BIKER-BARN SOURCE SALES, INC.
Respondent: ACTION MOTORSPORTS, INC.
Judges: WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM
Agency: Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Mar. 02, 2009
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Friday, October 2, 2009.

Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2009
Summary: The issue in the case is whether an application for a new point franchise motor vehicle dealership filed by Zongshen, Inc., and Biker-Barn Source Sales, Inc., should be approved.There was no evidence that Respondent does not adequately represent a line-make. The application for the new dealership should be denied.
STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


ZONGSHEN, INC. AND BIKER-BARN

)




SOURCE SALES, INC.,

)

)




Petitioners,

)





)




vs.

)

Case

No.

09-1106


)




ACTION MOTORSPORTS, INC.,

)





)




Respondent.

)




)





RECOMMENDED ORDER


On September 2, 2009, an administrative hearing in this case was held by video teleconference in Fort Myers and Tallahassee, Florida, before William F. Quattlebaum, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner Zongshen, Inc.:


(No appearance)


For Petitioner Biker-Barn Source Sales, Inc.:


(No appearance)


For Respondent: Howard Chappell, Esquire

Law Offices of Howard Chappell 1514 Cumberland Court

Fort Myers, Florida 33919

STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue in the case is whether an application for a new point franchise motor vehicle dealership filed by Zongshen, Inc., and Biker-Barn Source Sales, Inc., should be approved.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By notice published in the Florida Administrative Weekly (Volume 35, Number 5; February 6, 2009), the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) gave notice that Zongshen, Inc. (Zongshen), was seeking to establish a new point motor vehicle dealership in Cape Coral, Lee County, Florida, with Biker-Barn Source Sales, Inc. (Biker-Barn), for the line- make "Zongshen Industrial Group (ZONG)." A challenge to the establishment of the dealership was filed with the Department by an existing motorcycle dealership, Action Motorsports, Inc. (Respondent).

By letter dated February 27, 2009, the Department forwarded the challenge to the Division of Administrative Hearings. An Initial Order was issued on March 2, 2009, directing the parties to identify dates upon which the parties were available for hearing. The Respondent filed a response to the Initial Order. The hearing was scheduled in accordance with the Respondent's response and with Subsection 320.699(2), Florida Statutes (2009).

Neither Petitioner appeared or was otherwise represented at the hearing. The Respondent was represented by counsel and had one exhibit admitted into evidence. No transcript of the hearing was filed. No proposed recommended orders were filed.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Biker-Barn is seeking to establish a new point franchise motor vehicle dealership at 924 Del Prado Boulevard South, Cape Coral, in Lee County, Florida, for line-make ZONG.

  2. The Respondent is an existing franchise dealer for ZONG-manufactured vehicles and is located within 12.5 miles of the proposed new point motor vehicle dealership location. The majority of the Respondent's vehicle sales come from within a 12.5-mile radius of the proposed dealership.

  3. The Respondent timely filed a protest of the proposed Biker-Barn dealership.

  4. There is no evidence that the Respondent is not providing adequate representation within the territory of the motor vehicles at issue in this proceeding.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  5. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to and subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57, Fla. Stat. (2009).

  6. Subsection 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes (2009), provides as follows:

    An application for a motor vehicle dealer license in any community or territory shall be denied when:


    1. A timely protest is filed by a presently existing franchised motor vehicle dealer with standing to protest as defined in subsection (3); and


    2. The licensee fails to show that the existing franchised dealer or dealers who register new motor vehicle retail sales or retail leases of the same line-make in the community or territory of the proposed dealership are not providing adequate representation of such line-make motor vehicles in such community or territory. The burden of proof in establishing inadequate representation shall be on the licensee. (Emphasis supplied)


  7. The licensees in this case are Petitioners Zongshen and Biker-Barn. See §§ 320.60(8) and 320.61, Fla. Stat. (2009).

  8. As the licensees, the Petitioners have the burden of establishing compliance with applicable statutory requirements by a preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing. See § 320.642(2)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2009). The Petitioners have failed to establish that the Respondent is not providing adequate representation of the ZONG line-make.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Department enter a final order denying the Petitioners' application for establishment of the new point franchise motor vehicle dealer franchise.

DONE AND ENTERED this 2nd day of October, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

S

WILLIAM F. QUATTLEBAUM

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of October, 2009.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Jennifer Clark

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-308 2900 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0635


Howard Chappell, Esquire

Law Offices of Howard Chappell 1514 Cumberland Court

Fort Myers, Florida 33919


Joe Arguinzoni

Biker-Barn Source Sales, Inc.

924 Del Prado Boulevard South, Unit B Cape Coral, Florida 33990


Patricia Fornes Zongshen, Inc.

3511 Northwest 113th Court Miami, Florida 33178

Carl A. Ford, Director Division of Motor Vehicles

Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building, Room B-439 2900 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500


Robin Lotane, General Counsel Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Neil Kirkman Building

2900 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 09-001106
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 29, 2009 Final Order filed.
Oct. 02, 2009 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Oct. 02, 2009 Recommended Order (hearing held September 2, 2009). CASE CLOSED.
Sep. 02, 2009 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 18, 2009 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 2, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to Fort Myers hearing location).
Jul. 27, 2009 Amended Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for September 2, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to type of hearing and location).
Mar. 12, 2009 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Mar. 12, 2009 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for September 2, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Myers, FL).
Mar. 03, 2009 Respondent`s Response to Initial Order filed.
Mar. 02, 2009 Initial Order.
Mar. 02, 2009 Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed.
Mar. 02, 2009 Notice of Intent to Protest of Intent to Establish a New Dealership filed.
Mar. 02, 2009 Agency referral

Orders for Case No: 09-001106
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 28, 2009 Agency Final Order
Oct. 02, 2009 Recommended Order There was no evidence that Respondent does not adequately represent a line-make. The application for the new dealership should be denied.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer