STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
EL SOL TRADING, INC., AND TGT | ) | |||
COMPANIES, INC., d/b/a EXTREME | ) | |||
MOTOR SALES, | ) | |||
) | ||||
Petitioners, | ) ) | |||
vs. | ) ) | Case | No. | 09-1267 |
ACTION ORLANDO MOTORSPORTS, | ) ) | |||
Respondent. | ) | |||
| ) |
RECOMMENDED ORDER
On May 18, 2009, an administrative hearing in this case was held via teleconference from locations in Tallahassee and Orlando, Florida, before Lawrence P. Stevenson, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).
APPEARANCES
For Petitioners: (No appearance)
For Respondent: James Sursely, pro se
Action Orlando Motorsports
306 West Main Street Apopka, Florida 32712
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue is whether Petitioners are entitled to a motor vehicle dealership that is proposed to be located in Apopka, Florida.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On February 27, 2009, El Sol Trading, Inc., and TGT Companies, Inc., d/b/a Extreme Motor Sales (Petitioners) published a Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer in a County of More than 300,000 Population in the Florida Administrative Weekly. Respondent Action Orlando Motorsports filed a protest with the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) on March 9, 2009. By letter dated March 11, 2009, the Department referred the matter to DOAH to assign an administrative law judge to conduct a hearing "for the sole purpose of determining the propriety of the protest regarding issues specifically within the purview of Sections 320.642 and 320.699, Florida Statutes."
The hearing was convened as scheduled. Respondent was present and ready to proceed. Petitioners made no appearance.
James Sursely, the owner of Action Orlando Motorsports, testified at the hearing.
The hearing was not transcribed. Respondent waived the filing of a proposed recommended order. All references to the Florida Statutes are to the 2008 edition unless otherwise indicated.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Respondent is an existing franchised dealer of motorcycles manufactured by Chuanl Motorcycle Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (CHUA).
Petitioners have proposed the establishment of a new dealership to sell the same line and make of motorcycles as those sold by Respondent.
Respondent's dealership is located at 306 West Main Street, Apopka, Florida 32712.
Petitioners' proposed dealership would be located at 1918 South Orange Blossom Trail, Apopka, Florida 32703.
The proposed dealership is within a 12.5-mile radius of Respondent's dealership.
Respondent has standing to protest the establishment of the proposed dealership.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DOAH has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding. §§ 120.569 and 120.57(1), Fla. Stat.
The Department is the agency responsible for regulating the licensing and franchising of motor vehicle dealers.
§§ 320.60-320.70, Fla. Stat.
Subsection 320.642(1), Florida Statutes, requires a motor vehicle dealer who proposes to establish an additional motor vehicle dealership within an area already represented by
the same line-make vehicle to give written notice to the Department of its intent to establish a new franchise. The statute also provides that any affected dealership may protest the establishment of a new franchise in its territory.
Subsection 320.642(2), Florida Statutes, establishes the standards of review to determine if establishment of a new, competing motor vehicle franchise should be granted. Subsection 320.642(2)(a), Florida Statutes, provides in relevant part:
An application for a motor vehicle dealer license in any community or territory shall be denied when:
A timely protest is filed by a presently existing franchised motor vehicle dealer with standing to protest as defined in subsection (3); and
The licensee fails to show that the existing franchised dealer or dealers who register new motor vehicle retail sales or retail leases of the same line-make in the community or territory of the proposed dealership are not providing adequate representation of such line-make motor vehicles in such community or territory. The burden of proof in establishing inadequate representation shall be on the licensee.
Pursuant to Subsection (3)(b)1. of Section 320.642, Florida Statutes, "if the proposed additional . . . motor vehicle dealer is to be located in a county with a population of more than 300,000," as in the instant case, then any existing motor vehicle dealer of the same line-make whose licensed
franchise location is within a radius of 12.5 miles of the proposed additional dealer has standing to file a protest within the meaning of Subsection (2)(a)1. of the statute.
Respondent is an existing motor vehicle dealer who has standing to file a protest of the proposed new dealership in this case.
The burden is therefore on Petitioners to prove that there is "inadequate representation" in the community or territory of the proposed new dealership, according to the criteria set forth in Subsection 320.642(2)(b), Florida Statutes.
Petitioners made no appearance and presented no evidence at the final hearing. Petitioners failed to meet their burden of proof.
The approval sought by Petitioners must therefore be denied.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
RECOMMENDED:
That the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles enter a final order denying the establishment of Petitioners' proposed franchise.
DONE AND ENTERED this 29th day of May, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
LAWRENCE P. STEVENSON
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 29th day of May, 2009.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Carl A. Ford, Director Division of Motor Vehicles
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkland Building, Room B-439 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
Robin Lotane, General Counsel Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0500
Jennifer Clark
Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-432 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32344
James Sursely
Action Orlando Motorsports
306 West Main Street Apopka, Florida 32712
Gloria Ma
El Sol Trading, Inc., d/b/a Motobravo, Inc.
19877 Quiroz Court
City of Industry, California 91789
Tina Wilson
TGT Companies, Inc., d/b/a Extreme Motor Sales
1918 South Orange Blossom Trail Apopka, Florida 32703
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jul. 09, 2009 | Final Order filed. |
May 29, 2009 | Recommended Order (hearing held May 18, 2009). CASE CLOSED. |
May 29, 2009 | Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency. |
May 18, 2009 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Mar. 23, 2009 | Order of Pre-hearing Instructions. |
Mar. 23, 2009 | Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 18, 2009; 1:00 p.m.; Orlando and Tallahassee, FL). |
Mar. 18, 2009 | Unilateral Response to Initial Order filed. |
Mar. 12, 2009 | Initial Order. |
Mar. 12, 2009 | Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed. |
Mar. 12, 2009 | Protest of Intent to Establish a New Point Dealership filed. |
Mar. 12, 2009 | Agency referral |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 06, 2009 | Agency Final Order | |
May 29, 2009 | Recommended Order | Petitioners failed to appear. No evidence was presented to show that existing motorcycle dealership does not adequately represent line-make in the territory of the proposed dealer. |