STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
JOYCE HERRING, EEOC Case No. NONE
Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2010-01845
v. DOAH Case No. 10-10456
BREHON INSTITUTE FOR FAMILY FCHR Order No. 11-063 SERVICE,
Respondent.
/
This matter is before the Commission for consideration of the Recommended Order of Dismissal, dated May 17, 2011, issued in the above-styled matter by Administrative Law Judge Diane Cleavinger.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
Judge Cleavinger’s order reflects that Petitioner failed to appear at the scheduled administrative hearing in the case. Specifically, Judge Cleavinger’s order states that based on Petitioner’s failure to appear, “Petitioner has not carried her burden of proof in this matter and the Petition for Relief should be dismissed.” Consequently, the order recommends that the Commission issue a final order dismissing the Petition for Relief.
Commission panels have concluded that when a Petitioner fails to appear at the scheduled administrative hearing in their case, they fail to meet their burden of proof, and the Petition for Relief should be dismissed. See, e.g., Dotson v. Department of Financial Services, FCHR Order No. 11-034 (April 13, 2011), Patterson v. Panama City Housing Authority, FCHR Order No. 11- 001 (January 13, 2011), Crump v. The Majestic Tower at Bal Harbour, FCHR Order No. 10-072 (September 21, 2010), Bermudez v. Lake County Housing Authority, FCHR Order No. 10-041 (April 27, 2010), Cowden v. Difiglio, et al., FCHR Order No. 09-115 (December 14, 2009), Scott v. Two Men and a Truck, FCHR Order No. 09-009 (January 27, 2009), Enzor v. Sandco, Inc., FCHR Order No. 08-048 (July 29, 2008), Rodriguez v. Center Point Health and Rehab, FCHR Order No. 08-001 (January 14, 2008), West v. Sembler Corporation, d/b/a Bay Walk, FCHR Order No. 07-037 (June 15, 2007), Martinez v. KJC Enterprises, d/b/a Plantation Island Resort, FCHR Order No. 07-028 (April 20, 2007), Chaney, et al. v. Robert Buckner & Associates, FCHR Order No. 06-092 (November 13, 2006), and Prek v. Workforce Central Florida, FCHR Order No. 06-079 (September 18, 2006).
FCHR Order No. 11-063
Page 2
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s finding as to the nonappearance of Petitioner and conclude that Petitioner has failed to carry her burden of proof.
Exceptions
Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order of Dismissal.
Dismissal
The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right of appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.
DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of August , 2011. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:
Commissioner Donna Elam, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Watson Haynes, II; and Commissioner Mario M. Valle
Filed this 2nd day of August , 2011, in Tallahassee, Florida.
/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk Commission on Human Relations
2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 488-7082
FCHR Order No. 11-063
Page 3
Copies furnished to:
Joyce Herring
501 South Main Street Havana, FL 32333
Brehon Institute for Family Service c/o Harold R. Mardenborough, Esq. Carr Allison
305 South Gadsden Street Tallahassee, FL 32301
Diane Cleavinger, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 2nd day of August , 2011.
By: /s/
Clerk of the Commission
Florida Commission on Human Relations
Joyce Herring v. Brehon Institute for Family Service DOAH 10-10456
FCHR 2010-01845
EEOC none
FCHR Order No. 11-063
Type of case: employment
Basis of discrimination: disability, retaliation Commission staff determination: no cause ALJ recommendation: dismissal
Commission panel final action: Adopt Recommended Order Key Words: failure to appear
ADDRESSES FOR NOTICE:
For Petitioner……. Joyce Herring
501 South Main Street Havana, FL 32333
For Respondent…..
Brehon Institute for Family Service c/o Harold R. Mardenborough, Esq. Carr Allison
305 South Gadsden Street Tallahassee, FL 32301
DOCKET INFORMATION:
Rec Order: Dismissal Transcript: No Exhibits: No Exceptions: No
STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
Order Approval/Disapproval
TO: FCHR Commissioners impaneled to decide the below-referenced case FROM: Jim Mallue, Assistant General Counsel
RE: Herring v. Brehon Institute for Family Service
DOAH 10-10456; FCHR 2010-01845; FCHR Order No. 11-063
Accompanying this “Order Approval/Disapproval” page is a copy of a final order drafted by the Panel’s counsel / legal advisor containing counsel’s recommendation to you regarding the disposition of the case. This case has been returned to the Commission from the Division of Administrative Hearings.
Please review the case record and determine whether you are in agreement with the recommendations contained in the order drafted by Commission counsel.
Further, please indicate your approval or disapproval of the order drafted by Commission counsel by signing on the appropriate line below, and returning this form by FAX to Denise Crawford in the Commission’s Tallahassee office at 850-488-5291, and by then returning this form by Mail to Ms. Denise Crawford, Clerk of the Commission, Florida Commission on Human Relations, 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100, Tallahassee, FL 32301. If a majority of the panel approves of the order, the order will be entered by the Clerk of the Commission.
# # #
I approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:
, Commissioner.
I do not approve of the order drafted to reflect the Commission’s disposition of this matter:
, Commissioner.
END
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Aug. 02, 2011 | Agency Final Order | |
May 17, 2011 | Recommended Order | Petitioner failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. Therefore, she did not meet her burden of proof. Recommend dismissal of her Petition for Relief. |