Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JACQUELINE ASH vs PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING WOODMONT, 15-001871 (2015)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 15-001871 Visitors: 17
Petitioner: JACQUELINE ASH
Respondent: PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING WOODMONT
Judges: SUZANNE VAN WYK
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Apr. 07, 2015
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, August 13, 2015.

Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2015
Summary: Whether Petitioner was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, Pacifica Senior Living Woodmont, on account of Petitioner’s age or race, in violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case of employment discrimination based on either age or race.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON RELATIONS


JACQUELINE ASH, EEOC No. 15D201400328


Petitioner, FCHR No. 2014-00515


v. DOAH No. 15-1871

PACIFICA SENIOR LIVING WOODMONT, FCHR Order No. 15-065


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Jacqueline Ash filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - Florida Statutes (2013), alleging that Respondent Pacifica Senior Living Woodmont committed an unlawful employment practice on the bases of Petitioner's age (DOB: 9-9-73) and race (African American) by terminating Petitioner from employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on February 24, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable

cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held in Tallahassee, Florida, on June before Administrative Law Judge Suzanne Van Wyk.

Judge Van Wyk issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated August

2015.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and

determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


We find the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact to be supported by competent substantial evidence.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.



Filed October 14, 2015 2:48 PM Division of Administrative Hearings


FCHR Order No. 15-065

Page 2


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We note that in analyzing whether Petitioner had established a case of age discrimination the Administrative Law Judge concluded, "Petitioner is a member of a protected class, both as an and an employee who has attained the age of 40." Recommended Order, 40.

Commission panels have concluded that one of the elements for establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992 is a showing that individuals similarly-situated to Petitioner of a "different" age were treated more favorably, and Commission panels have noted that the age "40" has no significance in the interpretation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. See, e.g., Downs v. Shear Express, Inc., FCHR Order No. 06-036 (May 24, 2006), and cases and analysis set out therein; see also, Boles v. Santa Rosa County Office, FCHR Order No. (February 8, 2008), and cases and analysis set out therein.

Consequently, we yet again note that the age "40" has no significance in the interpretation of the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. Accord, e.g., Torrence v. Hendrick Honda Order No. 15-027 (May 21, 2015), Grasso v. Agency for Health Care Administration, FCHR Order No. 15-001 (January 14, 2015), Cox v. Gulf Breeze Resorts Realty, Inc., FCHR Order No. 09-037 (April 13, 2009), Toms v. Marion County School Board, FCHR Order No. 07-060 (November 7, 2007), and Stewart v. Pasco County Board of County Commissioners, d/b/a Pasco County Library System, FCHR Order No. 07-050 (September 25, 2007). But, cfi, City of Hollywood, Florida v.

986 So. 2d 634 (4t h DCA 2008).

With this comment, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


FCHR Order No. 1 5 - 0 6 5

Page 3


DONE AND ORDERED this day of

FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Tony Jenkins; and

Commissioner Sandra Turner


Filed this day , 2 0 1 5 ,

in Tallahassee, Florida.


Clerk J

Commission on Human Relations 4 0 7 5 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 3 2 3 9 9


Copies furnished to:


Jacqueline Ash

4 6 2 Darsey Road Cairo, GA 2 9 8 2 8


Pacifica Senior Living c/o Timothy Tack, Esq. Kunkel Miller &

3 5 5 0 Bushwood Park Drive, Ste. 1 3 5

Tampa, FL


Suzanne Van Wyk, Administrative Law Judge, James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel



I HEREBY

that a


has been mailed to the above

listed addressees this


of


, 2 0 1 5 .


By:

Clerk of the

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 15-001871
Issue Date Proceedings
Oct. 14, 2015 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief From an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Aug. 13, 2015 Recommended Order (hearing held June 16, 2015). CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 13, 2015 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jul. 15, 2015 Respondent's Revised Notice of Filing Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 13, 2015 Respondent's Notice of Filing Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 10, 2015 Order Granting Extension of Time.
Jun. 29, 2015 (Respondent's) Motion to Extend Time for Filing Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed.
Jun. 25, 2015 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Jun. 16, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Jun. 10, 2015 Respondent's Witness List filed.
Jun. 10, 2015 Respondent's (Proposed) Exhibit List filed.
May 04, 2015 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Apr. 27, 2015 Court Reporter Request filed.
Apr. 27, 2015 Letter to Judge Van Wyk from Jacqueline Ash regarding loss of unemployment filed.
Apr. 24, 2015 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Apr. 24, 2015 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for June 16, 2015; 9:30 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Apr. 24, 2015 Notice of Appearance and Response to Initial Order filed.
Apr. 21, 2015 Order Denying Motion to Dismiss.
Apr. 14, 2015 (Respondent's) Motion to Dismiss Petition filed.
Apr. 07, 2015 Initial Order.
Apr. 07, 2015 Charge of Discrimination filed.
Apr. 07, 2015 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Apr. 07, 2015 Determination: No Cause filed.
Apr. 07, 2015 Petition for Relief filed.
Apr. 07, 2015 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 15-001871
Issue Date Document Summary
Oct. 14, 2015 Agency Final Order
Aug. 13, 2015 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case of employment discrimination based on either age or race.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer