Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOROTHY SCOTT vs SUNSHINE AUTO MART, 15-004432 (2015)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 15-004432 Visitors: 40
Petitioner: DOROTHY SCOTT
Respondent: SUNSHINE AUTO MART
Judges: LYNNE A. QUIMBY-PENNOCK
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Winston, Florida
Filed: Aug. 10, 2015
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 4, 2015.

Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: Initially the issue was, whether Respondent, Sunshine Auto Mart, discriminated against Petitioner, Dorothy Scott, on the basis of her disability, and, if so, what remedy should be ordered. However, at the beginning of the hearing, the parties agreed that the hearing would be limited to the question of whether Respondent met the definition of “employer” under the Florida Civil Rights Act.Petitioner did not establish that Respondent met the definition of "employer" in section 760.02 (7), Fla. Stat
More
TempHtml



STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


DOROTHY SCOTT, EEOC No.


Petitioner, FCHR No. 2015-00821


v. No. 15-4432

SUNSHINE AUTO MART, FCHR Order No. 16-001


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR

RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Dorothy Scott filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - Florida Statutes alleging that Respondent Sunshine Auto Mart committed an unlawful employment practice on the basis of Petitioner's disability by terminating Petitioner from employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on July 6,

the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held in Winter Haven, Florida, on October 9, before Administrative Law Judge Lynne A. Quimby-Pennock.

Judge Quimby-Pennock issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated November 4,

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Coleman v.


Filed January 21, 2016 10:56 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Beach, Ocean Center Parking Garage, FCHR Order No. 14-034 (September 10, Gantz, et v. Zion's Hope, Inc., d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No. (June 6, and Hall v. Villages of West Oaks A, FCHR Order No. 08-007

(January 14, 2008).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We that whether a Respondent has the requisite number of employees to be governed by the Florida Civil Rights Act of is not a jurisdictional issue, but rather is an element of Petitioner's claim for relief, which, in the instant case, the Administrative Law Judge appears to conclude that Petitioner failed to prove, as set out in Recommended Order, 4 and 8. See Benton v. and Associates, FCHR Order No. 15-036 (June 10, 2015); see, also Prince v. Blanton Plumbing / Douglas Blanton, FCHR Order No. (February 6, citing Kaplan v. Lappin and the Palm Beach Pops, Inc., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73004 (S.D. 2010) and Hill v. Goga Bap Corporation, d/b/a Subway Store No. FCHR Order No. 13-023 (March 2013).

With this comment, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED this day FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION


Commissioner Michael Keller, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Gilbert M . Singer; and Commissioner Sandra Turner


Filed this day of ., 2016, in Tallahassee, Florida.


Clerk J

Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Dorothy Scott

c/o Shawn Esq.

Law,

Post Office Box 1847 Winter Haven, FL 33882


Sunshine Auto Mart

c/o Ralph H. Schofield, Jr., Esq.

Clark, Campbell, Lancaster & Munson, 500 S. Florida Ave., Suite 800


Lakeland, FL 33801


Lynne A. Quimby-Pennock, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a the foregoing has been mailed to the above


By:

Clerk of the

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 15-004432
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 21, 2016 Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Nov. 04, 2015 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Nov. 04, 2015 Recommended Order (hearing held October 9, 2015). CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 27, 2015 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Oct. 27, 2015 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Oct. 23, 2015 (Proposed) Recommended Order Following Evidentiary Hearing filed.
Oct. 23, 2015 Notice Regarding Proposed Orders filed.
Oct. 23, 2015 (Proposed) Order Following Administrative Hearing filed.
Oct. 09, 2015 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Oct. 06, 2015 Respondent's Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Oct. 06, 2015 Notice of Appearance (Ralph Schofield) filed.
Sep. 30, 2015 Petitioner's Witness and Exhibit List filed.
Aug. 31, 2015 Court Reporter Scheduled filed.
Aug. 20, 2015 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Aug. 20, 2015 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 9, 2015; 9:00 a.m.; Winter Haven, FL).
Aug. 11, 2015 Initial Order.
Aug. 10, 2015 Employment Charge of Discrimination filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Determination: No Cause filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Petition for Relief filed.
Aug. 10, 2015 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 15-004432
Issue Date Document Summary
Jan. 21, 2016 Agency Final Order
Nov. 04, 2015 Recommended Order Petitioner did not establish that Respondent met the definition of "employer" in section 760.02 (7), Fla. Stat.; Recommend dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer