Petitioner: PAM STEWART, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION
Respondent: BRIAN FASO
Judges: F. SCOTT BOYD
Agency: Department of Education
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, October 17, 2018.
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2025
STATE OF FLORIDA
EDUCATION PRACTICES COMMISSION
PAM STEWART, as
Commissioner of Education,
Petitioner,
vs. CASE NO. 145-2879
BRIAN FASO,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
Petitioner, Pam Stewart, as Commissioner of Education, files this Administrative
Complaint against BRIAN FASO. The Petitioner seeks the appropriate disciplinary sanction of
the Respondent’s educator’s certificate pursuant to sections 1012.315, 1012.795, and 1012.796,
Florida Statutes, and pursuant to Rule 6A-10.081, Florida Administrative Code, Principles of
Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida, said sanctions specifically set forth
in sections 1012.795(1) and 1012.796(7), Florida Statutes.
The Petitioner alleges:
JURISDICTION
1. The Respondent holds Florida Educator’s Certificate 780115, covering the areas of
Educational Leadership, Physical Education and School Principal, which is valid through June 30,
2020.
2. At all times pertinent hereto, the Respondent was employed as a Principal at
Miramar High School in the Broward County School District.
MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS
3. Respondent failed to perform his duties as principal when he failed to properly
enforce district disciplin: olicy with regard to student athletes. In or around September 20,
2013, Student Ce was allowed to play in a football game
even though he had not been i school for the required hours for that day. On or about April 2,
2014, Respondent directly instructed a subordinate to change the finding of her disciplinary
investigation to ensure there would not be an impact ity to play football.
BRIAN FASO
Administrative Complaint
Page 2 of 3
4. During his tenure as principal, Respondent knew or should have known of over
400 improper student grade changes made by his staff. The grade changes were processed
without his review or administrative approval as required by his district’s policies. Respondent
failed to correct the improper grade changes.
5. In 2014, 266 (47%) of the 561 graduates of Miramar High School received an
unjustified grade change during the 2013-2014 school year. The grade changes benefitted
Respondent in that the grade changes did or could have raised the overall grade of the school
resulting in, among other things, additional funds going to Respondent’s school. These funds
could be used as one-time pay increases for staff.
The Petitioner charges:
STATUTE VIOLATIONS
COUNT 1: The Respondent is in violation of section 1012.795(1)(g), Florida Statutes,
in that Respondent has been found guilty of personal conduct which seriously reduces
effectiveness as an employee of the school board.
COUNT 2: The Respondent is in violation of section 1012.795(1)G), Florida Statutes,
in that Respondent has violated the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education
Profession prescribed by State Board of Education rules.
RULE VIOLATIONS
COUNT 3: The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(2)(a)1, Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has failed to make reasonable
effort to protect the student from conditions harmful to learning and/or to the student’s mental
health and/or physical health and/or safety.
COUNT 4: — The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(2)(b)3, Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has used institutional privileges
for personal gain or advantage.
COUNT 5: The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(2)(c)1, Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has failed to maintain honesty in
all professional dealings.
COUNT 6: The allegations of misconduct set forth herein are in violation of Rule 6A-
10.081(2)(c)6, Florida Administrative Code, in that Respondent has used coercive means or
promised special treatment to influence professional judgments of colleagues.
(SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE)
BRIAN FASO
Administrative Complaint
Page 3 of 3
WHEREFORE, based on the reasons set forth herein and in accordance with the
Explanation of Rights and Election of Rights forms attached to and made a part of this
Administrative Complaint, Petitioner respectfully recommends that the Education Practices
Commission impose an appropriate sanction against the Respondent’s educator’s certificate
pursuant to the authority provided in sections 1012.795(1) and 1012.796(7), Florida Statutes. The
sanctions imposed by the Education Practices Commission may include, but are not limited to, any
one or a combination of the following: issuing the Respondent a written reprimand; placing the
Respondent on probation for any period of time; restricting the Respondent’s authorized scope of
practice; assessing the Respondent an administrative fine; directing the Respondent to enroll in the
Recovery Network Program; suspending the Respondent’s educator’s certificate for a period of
time not to exceed five years; revoking the Respondent’s educator’s certificate for a period of time
up to 10 years or permanently; determining the Respondent to be ineligible for certification; or
barring the Respondent from reapplying for an educator’s certificate for a period of time up to 10
years or permanently.
EXECUTED on this (6 — day of March _,2018.
hed hte}
PAM STEWART, as __ -
Commissioner of Education
State of Florida
Docket for Case No: 18-004185PL
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Oct. 17, 2018 |
Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
|
Oct. 17, 2018 |
Order Denying Motion to Stay or Set Hearing.
|
Oct. 16, 2018 |
Respondent's Motion to Stay or Set Hearing on Petitioner's Dismissal without Prejudice and Request for Attorneys' Fees filed.
|
Oct. 15, 2018 |
Petitioner's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice filed.
|
Oct. 15, 2018 |
Respondent's Unopposed Motion to Revalidate Deposition Subpoenas filed.
|
Oct. 15, 2018 |
Order Extending Discovery.
|
Oct. 15, 2018 |
Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Parties to Respond to Discovery filed.
|
Oct. 03, 2018 |
Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for December 6 and 7, 2018; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to hearing location).
|
Sep. 24, 2018 |
Respondent's Notice of Cancellation of Depositions filed.
|
Sep. 14, 2018 |
Order Granting Continuance and Rescheduling Hearing (hearing set for December 6 and 7, 2018; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Sep. 14, 2018 |
CASE STATUS: Pre-Hearing Conference Held. |
Sep. 12, 2018 |
Notice of Filing Supplemental Information for Case Status Conference filed.
|
Sep. 12, 2018 |
Amended Request for Telephonic Case Status Conference filed.
|
Sep. 11, 2018 |
Request for Telephonic Case Status Conference filed.
|
Sep. 11, 2018 |
Order Denying Continuance of Final Hearing.
|
Sep. 10, 2018 |
Joint Motion to Continue Final Hearing filed.
|
Sep. 10, 2018 |
Certificate of Service of Discovery filed.
|
Aug. 16, 2018 |
Respondent's Notice of Filing Interrogatories and First Request for Production filed.
|
Aug. 15, 2018 |
Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
|
Aug. 15, 2018 |
Notice of Hearing (hearing set for October 4 and 5, 2018; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
|
Aug. 15, 2018 |
Agreed upon Response to Initial Order filed.
|
Aug. 10, 2018 |
Initial Order.
|
Aug. 09, 2018 |
Administrative Complaint filed.
|
Aug. 09, 2018 |
Election of Rights filed.
|
Aug. 09, 2018 |
Agency referral filed.
|