Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
Respondent: JAMES J. BLANCHARD
Judges: J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Locations: Bonita Springs, Florida
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Friday, August 17, 2018.
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2025
FILED
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Deputy Agency Clerk
STATE OF FLORIDA CLERK ait Lanier Prociae
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULAT] pete 10/27/2017
DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING File #
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,
DIVISION OF PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 2017-022575
JAMES J. BLANCHARD,
Respondent.
/
ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT
The Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel
Wagering (“Petitioner” or “Division’”) files this Administrative Complaint against James J.
Blanchard (“Respondent”) and alleges:
1. Petitioner is the state agency charged with regulating pari-mutuel wagering
pursuant to chapter 550, Florida Statutes.
2. At all times material hereto Respondent held a pari-mutuel wagering professional
individual occupational license, number 72824-1021. Respondent’s occupational license expires
on June 30, 2018.
3. At all times material hereto, Respondent was the trainer of record for the
greyhounds located in kennel buildings #45 and #48 Blanchard Kennels located at The Florida
Kennel Compound (“Blanchard Kennels”).
4. On May 5, 2017, division investigators conducted an inspection of kennel
building #45 of the Blanchard Kennels.
5. Prior to the inspection of kennel building #45 on May 5, 2017, Respondent
advised his staff not to allow any division investigators into the kennel building and obstructed
the Division’s inspection for several hours. The Division was eventually allowed to inspect
kennel building #45 with Respondent’s cooperation later that day.
6. During the May 5, 2017, inspection division personnel discovered three
(3) greyhounds with expired vaccination documentation and an additional forty-three (43)
greyhounds who were missing proof of vaccinations.
7. During this same inspection, Respondent was unable to provide a kennel roster
containing the following information: (a) initial date each greyhound arrived to the kennel; (b)
name and tattoo number of each racing greyhound housed in the kennel; (c) the name of the
owner for each greyhound; (d) the name of the trainer for each greyhound; (e) the Kennel name;
(f) date of departure from the kennel; and (g) name and license number of person transporting the
racing greyhound.
8. On June 23, 2017, division investigators conducted an inspection of kennel
building #48 of the Blanchard Kennels.
9. During the inspection on June 23, 2017, Respondent was unable to provide
vaccination records for any of the greyhounds housed in building #48 of the Blanchard Kennels.
COUNT I
10. _ Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
one (1) through nine (9) as though fully set forth herein.
11. Rule 61D-6.009(8)(a)1., Florida Administrative Code, states:
(8)(a) All racing animals shall be inoculated for infectious,
contagious, and epizootic diseases including the following,
and given boosters as recommended by veterinarians:
1, Canine: Each of the following, once per year: Distemper,
Adenovirus (Hepatitis), Leptospirosis, Para-Influenza, Parvo,
Bordetella bronchiseptica and Rabies.
12. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Rule 61D-6.009(8)(a)1., Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to inoculate three (3) greyhounds for infectious, contagious and
epizotic diseases once per year.
COUNT IT
13. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
one (1) through nine (9) as though fully set forth herein.
14. Rule 61D-6.009(8)(b), Florida Administrative Code, states “[p]roof of
vaccination for each active or inactive racing greyhound must be kept on file by the kennel
owner/operator, trainer of record, or designee, and be subject to inspection...”
15. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Rule 61D-6.009(8)({b), Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to provide proof of vaccination for forty-three (43) racing
greyhounds on May 5, 2017
COUNT IT
16. _ Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
one (1) through nine (9) as though fully set forth herein.
17. Rule 61D-2.023(3)(), Florida Administrative Code, states:
(3) A greyhound racing trainer shall ensure that:
Gj) A roster is maintained to identify each racing greyhound
housed in the kennel. The roster shall contain the following
information:
1. Initial date of arrival;
2. Name and tattoo number of the racing greyhound;
3. Owner’s name;
4. Trainer’s name;
5. Kennel name;
6. Date of departure from the kennel; and
7. Name and license number of persons transporting the
racing greyhound.”
18. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Rule 61D-2.023(3)(j), Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to maintain a kennel roster on May 5, 2017.
COUNT IV
19, Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
one (1) through nine (9) as though fully set forth herein.
20. Rule 61D-2.003, Florida Administrative Code, states “[n]o person shall
knowingly engage in conduct that resists, obstructs, or opposes a division employee in the
performance of his or her duties and responsibilities on the permitholder’s premises.”
21. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Rule 61D-2.003, Florida
Administrative Code, by obstructing the division’s inspection of kennel building #45 of the
Blanchard Kennels on May 5, 2017
COUNT V
22. Petitioner hereby realleges and incorporates the allegations set forth in paragraphs
one (1) through nine (9) as though fully set forth herein.
23. Rule 61D-6.009(8)(b), Florida Administrative Code, states “[pJroof of
vaccination for each active or inactive racing greyhound must be kept on file by the kennel
owner/operator, trainer of record, or designee, and be subject to inspection...”
24. Based on the foregoing, Respondent violated Rule 61D-6.009(8)(b), Florida
Administrative Code, by failing to provide proof of vaccination for forty-three (43) racing
greyhounds on May 5, 2017
WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the Division enter an Order imposing an
administrative fine and/or any other relief that the Division is authorized to impose pursuant to
Section 550.0251, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 550, Florida Statutes, and/or the rules
promulgated thereunder.
Signed this 27™ day of October, 2017.
/s/ Charles Dewrelf
Charles Dewrell
Deputy Chief Attorney
Florida Bar No. 0102579
Charles. Dewrell@MyFloridaLicense.com
/s/ Louis Trombetta
Louis Trombetta
Chief Attorney
Florida Bar No. 108119
Louis. Trombetta@MyFloridaLicense.com
Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Office of the General Counsel
Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering
2601 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2202
Telephone: (850) 717-1508
Facsimile: (850) 921-1311
NOTICE OF RIGHTS
Please be advised that mediation under section 120.573, Florida Statutes, is not available
for administrative disputes involving this type of agency action.
Please be advised that Respondent has the right to request a hearing to be conducted in
accordance wiih Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Fiorida Siatuies, to be represented by counsei or
other qualified representative, to present evidence and argument, to call and cross-examine
witnesses and to have subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum issued on his or her behalf if a
hearing is requested. Any request for an administrative proceeding to challenge or contest the
charges contained in the administrative complaint must conform to Rule 28-106.2015, Florida
Administrative Code. Rule 28-106.111, Florida Administrative Code, provides in part that if
Respondent fails to request a hearing within 21 days of receipt of an agency pleading,
Respondent waives the right to request a hearing on the facts alleged.
Docket for Case No: 18-004186PL