Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Boley v. Pensacola Hardware Co., (1933)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 3
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: E. C. Maxwell, for Plaintiff in Error; Forsyth Caro, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Nov. 28, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *Page 70 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is
More

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for *Page 70 the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer