City of Pensacola v. Herron, (1933)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 14
Judges: DAVIS, C. J. —
Attorneys: Jerry J. Sullivan, for Plaintiff in Error;
R. P. Reese, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Nov. 16, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Judgment for $500.00 in favor of Mamie Herron, and in a like amount in favor of her husband, Noah Herron, was entered against the City of Pensacola for certain personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the defendant's alleged negligence in wrongfully permitting a sidewalk to be and continue, with knowledge of the municipality, in an unsafe, defective and dangerous condition. The particular defect complained of was alleged to have been an open iron curb cock
Summary: Judgment for $500.00 in favor of Mamie Herron, and in a like amount in favor of her husband, Noah Herron, was entered against the City of Pensacola for certain personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the defendant's alleged negligence in wrongfully permitting a sidewalk to be and continue, with knowledge of the municipality, in an unsafe, defective and dangerous condition. The particular defect complained of was alleged to have been an open iron curb cock w..
More
I concur in the conclusion reached on the principle announced in Woodmen of the World v. Hodges, 72 Fla. 467,73 Sou. Rep. 347, as applied to the rule relating to circumstantial evidence in civil cases.
Source: CourtListener
