Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Elbert B. Griffis, for Appellant;
C. L. Chancy and Rogers Norris, for Appellee.
Filed: Sep. 12, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note. The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16 , 104 So. 860 , and cases there cited. It is so ordered. Affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., WHITFIELD, ELL
Summary: The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note. The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16 , 104 So. 860 , and cases there cited. It is so ordered. Affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., WHITFIELD, ELLI..
More
The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note.
The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16, 104 So. 860, and cases there cited.
It is so ordered.
Affirmed.
DAVIS, C. J., WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
