Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hogue v. Morrison Const. Co., (1933)

Court: Supreme Court of Florida Number:  Visitors: 11
Judges: TERRELL, J. —
Attorneys: Miller McKay, for Appellant; A. M. Reder, M. D. Price, C. W. Zaring, C. D. Benson, B. E. Carey, Bart A. Riley, Hudson Cason and Carl T. Hoffman, for Appellees.
Filed: Jun. 23, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: D. N. Morrison Construction Company, Incorporated, of Virginia, a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, filed suit in Dade County against Robert C. Hogue and others therein named. Coley Peterson, Incorporated, of Virginia, a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, filed suit against Robert C. Hogue and others therein named. Each of these suits was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing a lien for labor and material alleged
More

This lien rests as much upon the duty of the owners to pay for labor and materials accepted by him as upon the right of the mechanic to demand payment. The lien was property. Section 6026 C. G. L. says that violation of the statute shall not affect "the title to property acquired, held or disposed of." And Section 6029 says that failure to comply with the Act shall not affect the validity of contracts made by a foreign corporation. See Pope v. Finch, 136 So. 496. This would cover implied contracts. The acquisition of the lien inures to any "person," regardless of residence, who performs labor or furnishes materials. See Section 5380 C. G. L. Corporations are persons within the meaning of the statute. The lien "is an interest in the property." See 227 Mass. 446, *Page 300 116 N.E. 888. The non-compliance with the corporation statute does not destroy the operative force of the lien law.

ON REHEARING.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer