Murphy v. State, (1933)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 5
Judges: PER CURIAM. —
Attorneys: Giles Gurney, for Plaintiffs in Error;
J. V. Walton, for Defendant in Error.
Filed: Oct. 17, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the same having been duly considered by the Court, and no reversible error appearing in the record; it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment rendered in the cause is hereby affirmed. DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
This cause having been submitted to the Court upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the same having been duly considered by the Court, and no reversible error appearing in the record; it is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the judgment rendered in the cause is hereby affirmed.
DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
Source: CourtListener
