Palbicke v. Takami, (1933)
Court: Supreme Court of Florida
Number:
Visitors: 14
Judges: BUFORD, J. —
Attorneys: Walter F. Rogers and William T. Rogers, for Appellant;
Charles A. Powers, for Appellee.
Filed: Nov. 10, 1933
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: This cause is before us on appeal from an order dismissing bill of complaint in a suit which was instituted to foreclose a tax deed. The bill of complaint was filed on December 21, 1931. It alleges that the tax deed was issued on December 15, 1926. There is no allegation in the bill of complaint sufficient to show that the tax deed was a valid instrument at the time of the institution of the suit and this question was raised by demurrer. Section 794, R. G. S., 1020, C. G. L., provides as follows
Summary: This cause is before us on appeal from an order dismissing bill of complaint in a suit which was instituted to foreclose a tax deed. The bill of complaint was filed on December 21, 1931. It alleges that the tax deed was issued on December 15, 1926. There is no allegation in the bill of complaint sufficient to show that the tax deed was a valid instrument at the time of the institution of the suit and this question was raised by demurrer. Section 794, R. G. S., 1020, C. G. L., provides as follows:..
More
In our opinion, the description in the tax deed is so vague and uncertain as to make it a nullity.
Source: CourtListener
