Judges: Barkdull, Baskin and Ferguson
Filed: Jan. 24, 1984
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 443 So. 2d 1085 (1984) SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Kevin Dowling, Appellants, v. Dwight BARNES, Appellee. No. 83-1593. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 24, 1984. *1086 Shutts & Bowen and John T. Kolinski and Sally M. Richardson, Miami, for appellants. duFresne & Bradley and Amy Lehman and Elizabeth duFresne, Miami, for appellee. Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. We find that publication of slander can occur in intra-corporation
Summary: 443 So. 2d 1085 (1984) SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Kevin Dowling, Appellants, v. Dwight BARNES, Appellee. No. 83-1593. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 24, 1984. *1086 Shutts & Bowen and John T. Kolinski and Sally M. Richardson, Miami, for appellants. duFresne & Bradley and Amy Lehman and Elizabeth duFresne, Miami, for appellee. Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ. PER CURIAM. We find that publication of slander can occur in intra-corporation c..
More
443 So. 2d 1085 (1984)
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and Kevin Dowling, Appellants,
v.
Dwight BARNES, Appellee.
No. 83-1593.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
January 24, 1984.
Shutts & Bowen and John T. Kolinski and Sally M. Richardson, Miami, for appellants.
duFresne & Bradley and Amy Lehman and Elizabeth duFresne, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We find that publication of slander can occur in intra-corporation communications. See: Glynn v. City of Kissimmee, 383 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Drennen v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 328 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Arison Shipping Company v. Smith, 311 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Restatement 2d of Torts, ยง 596. We do not read Pledger v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., 432 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) to prohibit such a finding. We also find no error in this case in submitting the question of qualified privilege to a jury. Hartley & Parker, Inc. v. Copeland, 51 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1951); Abraham v. Baldwin, 52 Fla. 151, 42 So. 591 (1906); Riggs v. Cain, 406 So. 2d 1202 (Fla. 3th DCA 1981); Lewis v. Evans, 406 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).
Therefore the final judgment on the jury verdict be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
