Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Barquin v. Flores, 84-995 (1984)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 84-995 Visitors: 14
Judges: Barkdull, Baskin and Jorgenson
Filed: Nov. 20, 1984
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 459 So. 2d 436 (1984) Juan BARQUIN, Appellant, v. Orestes FLORES and Jose Flores, Appellees. No. 84-995. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 20, 1984. Joel Lumer, Jugo & Ferradaz, Miami, for appellant. Harvey D. Friedman, Miami Beach, for appellees. Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ. BASKIN, Judge. Florida courts have consistently held that gambling obligations, even if valid in the *437 state in which they were undertaken, are unenforceable in Florida as contra
More
459 So. 2d 436 (1984)

Juan BARQUIN, Appellant,
v.
Orestes FLORES and Jose Flores, Appellees.

No. 84-995.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 20, 1984.

Joel Lumer, Jugo & Ferradaz, Miami, for appellant.

Harvey D. Friedman, Miami Beach, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

BASKIN, Judge.

Florida courts have consistently held that gambling obligations, even if valid in the *437 state in which they were undertaken, are unenforceable in Florida as contrary to law and public policy. See Dorado Beach Hotel Corp. v. Jernigan, 202 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), appeal dismissed, 209 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1968); Young v. Sands, Inc., 122 So. 2d 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); ยง 849.26, Fla. Stat. (1977). Thus, we find no error in the trial court's dismissal of Barquin's complaint, even though the gambling proceeds he sought to recover derived from a Puerto Rican lottery ticket lawfully purchased by a Puerto Rican resident in Puerto Rico.

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer