Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. v. Padron, 3D99-2644 (2000)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D99-2644 Visitors: 3
Judges: Goderich and Sorondo, Jj., and Nesbitt, Senior Judge
Filed: Nov. 22, 2000
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 775 So. 2d 372 (2000) UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Benita E. PADRON, et al., Appellees. No. 3D99-2644. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 22, 2000. *373 Perez, Goran & Rodriguez and Luis N. Perez, Coral Gables, for appellant. Laurie S. Moss, Davie, and Diane H. Tutt, Plantation, for appellees. Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. Because the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its dis
More
775 So. 2d 372 (2000)

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Benita E. PADRON, et al., Appellees.

No. 3D99-2644.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 22, 2000.

*373 Perez, Goran & Rodriguez and Luis N. Perez, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Laurie S. Moss, Davie, and Diane H. Tutt, Plantation, for appellees.

Before GODERICH and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by determining the lodestar amount of attorneys' fees or by applying a 1.5 contingency risk multiplier, we affirm the award of attorneys' fees. See Centex-Rooney Constr. Co. v. Martin County, 725 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer