Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

State v. Brass, 1D05-750 (2005)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 1D05-750 Visitors: 3
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jul. 21, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 906 So. 2d 1224 (2005) STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. Carolyn BRASS, Respondent. No. 1D05-750. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 21, 2005. Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel, and Judson M. Chapman, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Petitioner. *1225 Mitchell A. Stone of Stone, Taylor & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Petitioner seeks cer
More
906 So. 2d 1224 (2005)

STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner,
v.
Carolyn BRASS, Respondent.

No. 1D05-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 21, 2005.

Enoch J. Whitney, General Counsel, and Judson M. Chapman, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

*1225 Mitchell A. Stone of Stone, Taylor & Associates, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order which overturned the hearing officer's order sustaining the administrative suspension of respondent's driver's license. Based upon the clear case law, we grant the petition and quash the order entered by the circuit judge. The circuit judge should have, but did not, limit her inquiry to whether "there was competent, substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's findings." Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Silva, 806 So. 2d 551, 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). Instead of focusing solely upon the admissibility of certain statements made by respondent to the investigating officer, the circuit court, under the relevant law, should have focused upon all the factors and circumstances known to the investigative officer in making a probable cause determination as to whether respondent was the driver of the vehicle in question. See Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Friend, 837 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Currier, 824 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Haskins, 752 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Smith, 687 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Dep't of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Favino, 667 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Unlike the situation in Nelson v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 757 So. 2d 1264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), the present record contains ample evidence that, when viewed in its totality, supported the officer's probable cause determination.

We GRANT the Petition for Writ of Certiorari and QUASH the order of the circuit court, with directions to reinstate the administrative suspension.

KAHN, C.J., BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer