Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

West v. State, 2D07-5087 (2009)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D07-5087 Visitors: 10
Judges: Dakan
Filed: Mar. 04, 2009
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 1 So. 3d 1290 (2009) Jerry L. WEST, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D07-5087. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 4, 2009. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn Elizabeth Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. DAKAN, STEVEN L., Associate Senior Judge. Jerry L. West seeks review of the final judgment and sentence
More
1 So. 3d 1290 (2009)

Jerry L. WEST, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D07-5087.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 4, 2009.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn M. Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Dawn Elizabeth Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

DAKAN, STEVEN L., Associate Senior Judge.

Jerry L. West seeks review of the final judgment and sentence adjudicating him guilty of unauthorized use or possession of a driver's license as well as the revocation of his probation. We affirm without comment the conviction and the revocation of probation based on the conviction. However, because the written order of revocation does not conform to the trial court's oral pronouncement, we remand with directions that the revocation order be corrected *1291 to conform to the oral pronouncement.

At the revocation hearing, the trial court announced that it was revoking West's probation for two violations of condition 5 based on West's failure to live and remain at liberty without violating the law.[1] However, the written revocation order states that probation was revoked for four violations of condition 5 and a separate violation of condition 4.

"A written order of revocation of probation must conform [to] the trial court's oral pronouncement." Turner v. State, 873 So. 2d 480, 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (citing Williams v. State, 764 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)). Accordingly, we remand this case with directions to the trial court to correct the written revocation order to conform to the oral pronouncement.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

DAVIS and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

NOTES

[1] The trial court found that West violated this condition by possessing and delivering cocaine.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer