Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Christopher Lamont Altman v. State of Florida, 18-0843 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 18-0843 Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-0843 _ CHRISTOPHER LAMONT ALTMAN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge. September 5, 2018 PER CURIAM. In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that th
More
         FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                STATE OF FLORIDA
                 _____________________________

                         No. 1D18-0843
                 _____________________________

CHRISTOPHER LAMONT ALTMAN,

    Appellant,

    v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

    Appellee.
                 _____________________________


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

                       September 5, 2018


PER CURIAM.

     In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s
probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial
court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the
Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as
alleged in grounds I through X of the fourth amended affidavit of
violation of probation. See Margolis v. State, 
148 So. 3d 532
, 532
(Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and
resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected
revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to
which the defendant admitted); Narvaez v. State, 
674 So. 2d 868
,
869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation
must comport with oral pronouncement, and remanding with
instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted
to nor found by the court). Appellant need not be present for this
correction.

    AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

                 _____________________________

    Not final until disposition of any timely and
    authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
    9.331.
               _____________________________


Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer